지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2019.12
- 수록면
- 295 - 330 (36page)
- DOI
- 10.46694/JSS.2019.12.34.4.295
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
On September 2018 at the Eastern Economic Forum in Vladivostok, Russia President Vladimir Putin proposed to sign a peace treaty with Japan “no preconditions by the end of the year.” Prime Minister Shinzo Abe appreciated Putin’s remarks as an indication of his willingness to conclude a peace treaty. Finally, at the November 2018 summit meeting between Japan and Russia, Abe agreed to accelerate negotiations on the conclusion of a peace treaty based on the Japanese-Soviet Joint Declaration in 1956. This means changing the negotiation policy by returning two islands. As a result, the territorial disputes between the two countries seemed to move realistically.
However, despite the positive resumption of negotiations between Japan and Russia, the two countries have confirmed only the differences in their positions over the two islands. Russia argues that the return of the two islands is not detailed in the 1956 Japanese-Soviet Joint Declaration, and that it is necessary to discuss how to lead the two islands. In particular, the issue of sovereignty is considered as a subject of discussion, but Japan sees that sovereignty will be restored by two islands.
In addition, after returning under the Japan-US Security Treaty, Russia warned that US military bases were set up on these islands, and held the position that it would be difficult to hand over the sovereignty of the two islands to Japan. In this way, in the process of territorial negotiations between Japan and Russia, negotiations on the conclusion of the peace treaty have not made any progress since November 2018 due to differences in views on historical perceptions and security issues between the two countries. In addition, public opinion showing a strong position on the two islands lead also has a negative impact.
Eventually, Prime Minister Abe set the initial goal related to the conclusion of the Japan-Russia peace treaty by the Osaka G20 Summit in June 2019, and led the general agreement at this meeting, but the goal was not achieved. Abe’s the strategy of drawing out a certain degree of concession to return two islands from Russia should be reviewed.
This paper will discuss several things. First, this paper will analyze the position of the two countries that decided to accelerate negotiations for the conclusion of a peace treaty based on a joint declaration between the two countries in November 2018. Second, this paper will examine the differences between the two countries in relation to the territorial issue showing the negotiation process through the remarks of government officials. Third, this paper will try to find out why the peace treaty negotiations are delayed and how the territorial negotiations issue should be solved.
However, despite the positive resumption of negotiations between Japan and Russia, the two countries have confirmed only the differences in their positions over the two islands. Russia argues that the return of the two islands is not detailed in the 1956 Japanese-Soviet Joint Declaration, and that it is necessary to discuss how to lead the two islands. In particular, the issue of sovereignty is considered as a subject of discussion, but Japan sees that sovereignty will be restored by two islands.
In addition, after returning under the Japan-US Security Treaty, Russia warned that US military bases were set up on these islands, and held the position that it would be difficult to hand over the sovereignty of the two islands to Japan. In this way, in the process of territorial negotiations between Japan and Russia, negotiations on the conclusion of the peace treaty have not made any progress since November 2018 due to differences in views on historical perceptions and security issues between the two countries. In addition, public opinion showing a strong position on the two islands lead also has a negative impact.
Eventually, Prime Minister Abe set the initial goal related to the conclusion of the Japan-Russia peace treaty by the Osaka G20 Summit in June 2019, and led the general agreement at this meeting, but the goal was not achieved. Abe’s the strategy of drawing out a certain degree of concession to return two islands from Russia should be reviewed.
This paper will discuss several things. First, this paper will analyze the position of the two countries that decided to accelerate negotiations for the conclusion of a peace treaty based on a joint declaration between the two countries in November 2018. Second, this paper will examine the differences between the two countries in relation to the territorial issue showing the negotiation process through the remarks of government officials. Third, this paper will try to find out why the peace treaty negotiations are delayed and how the territorial negotiations issue should be solved.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 일·러 영토교섭 과정(2018년 11월~2019년 현재)
Ⅲ. 영토교섭의 과제
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
푸틴-아베시대 러-일 평화조약 체결교섭에서 본 분쟁4도의 군사안보적 중요성
슬라브학보
2020 .09
-
아베 수상의 대러 새로운 접근 : 공동경제활동을 중심으로
슬라브학보
2017 .12
-
국어 교과서 협상 단원에서의 ‘서희 협상’ 제재 활용 방식에 관한 비판적 고찰
국어교육연구
2019 .06
-
The San Francisco Peace Treaty and Territorial Issues: Information Pamphlets on Territorial Issues from the Japanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Their Impact
Korea Journal
2021 .06
-
샌프란시스코 강화조약과 한일 역사·영토 현안의 국제법적 검토
영토해양연구
2021 .12
-
언론을 통해 본 한일협정 인식 50년
역사비평
2015 .05
-
2002년 북일정상회담과 아베 신조의 부상
역사비평
2015 .08
-
한반도 평화 프로세스 구현에서 러시아 변수 고찰
슬라브학보
2019 .03
-
Treaties Leading to Japan’s Annexation of Korea : What Are the Problems?
Korea Journal
2016 .12
-
러·우 전쟁과 러시아의 글로벌 가치사슬(GVC) 구조 변화: 무역구조분석을 중심으로
슬라브학보
2024 .06
-
러시아-우크라이나 전쟁 이후 중국-러시아 경제협력
슬라브학보
2023 .09
-
러시아-우크라이나 전쟁과 러시아 외교안보정책 전망
슬라브학보
2024 .12
-
샌프란시스코 대일강화회의와 한국의 참가문제 - 한국의 내재적(內在的) 요인과 그 영향 -
사림
2015 .01
-
독도 영유권 논쟁의 쟁점탐구(하)
고조선단군학
2024 .04
-
샌프란시스코 강화조약과 동북아 영토갈등의 해법
영토해양연구
2021 .12
-
태정관지령과 샌프란시스코 조약의 관련성에 대한 검토 - 독도영유권 문제와 관련하여 -
독도연구
2016 .12
-
Peace Treaty versus Democratic Peace as a Peace Building Measure in Northeast Asia
Korea Observer
2021 .09
-
韓國內 中國 租界交涉과 中國近代外交 -駐朝鮮總領事의 租界撤廢交涉을 中心으로-
중국사연구
2015 .01
-
고고자료로 본 6세기대 백제와 가야의 관계
고조선단군학
2022 .12
-
러시아의 사이버안보 전략
슬라브학보
2017 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2020-349-000248213