메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류
인문학
인문학 일반 역사학 철학 종교학 어문학 기타 인문학
사회과학
사회과학 일반 경영학 관광학 교육학 군사학 문헌정보학 법학 사회학 신문방송학 심리과학 정치외교학 지리학 행정학 경제학 무역학 인류학 기타 사회과학
자연과학
자연과학 일반 물리학 생물학 생활과학 수학·통계학 천문학 지구과학 화학 기타 자연과학
공학
공학 일반 건축공학 기계공학 산업공학 재료·에너지공학 전기전자공학 조선해양공학 화학공학 컴퓨터학 기타공학
의약학
의학 일반 간호학 수의학 약학 한의학 기초의학 임상의학 기타 의약학
농수해양학
농수해양학 일반 농학 수산학 식품과학 임학 축산학 해상운송학 기타 농수해양학
예술체육학
예술 일반 디자인 미술 미용 사진 음악학 의상 체육 공연매체예술 기타 예술체육학
복합학
학제간연구 과학기술학 뇌인지과학 기술정책 기타 복합학

ENG

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
중국사학회 중국사연구 중국사연구 제95호
발행연도
2015.1
수록면
121 - 168 (48page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
With the Korea‐Japan annexation treaty in 1910, the Korea‐China relationship became merely a part of China‐Japan relationship. Although the Qing Dynasty fell in 1912, there was not any radical change in Chinese foreign relations. Until other countries approved the government of the Republic of China, however, it was impossible to promote ‘official’ international diplomatic negotiations with China. While Chinese diplomatic relations were under complicated and delicate transition, the issue of the abolishment of foreign settlements (租界撤廢) in Korea as a Japanese colony was raised. Chinese negotiation over the abolishment of foreign settlements in Korea was a process for protecting its people through maintaining vested interests and, on the other hand, a process to establish the status of China in modern international relations assuming equal relations among sovereign states. Then, we are faced with the question of what meanings the analysis of the negotiation process over the abolishment of foreign settlements has in understanding the formation of Chinese modern diplomacy or the history of modern China (Chinese diplomacy). First, the analysis illuminates the basic framework of Chinese diplomatic policies during the late Qing and early republican period. The fact that in the negotiation process, the Chinese government claimed that China had already become ‘one of sovereign states,’ namely, strongly demanded ‘equal treatment’ with other countries from Japan clearly reveals its modern sovereignty consciousness and the orientation of Chinese modern diplomatic negotiation based on the consciousness. In this way, the negotiation process provided a clue to the formation of Republican China’s policy framework that, going beyond the recognition of its Beijing government as a negotiation partner representing the state, pursued an equal status in the international society and participation in the rank of world powers. Second, those in charge of negotiation representing the Chinese government were working bureaucrats of modern diplomacy. The Chinese Consul General in Korea in those days was a translator trained after the establishment of Zongliyamen (總理衙門: the General Office of Foreign Affairs), an institution for Western affairs in charge of negotiation with the West, by the Qing government and, on the other hand, there were diplomats who were carrying out negotiation administration on the frontline of foreign negotiation in various places of the late Qing Dynasty and in the process of installing overseas diplomatic offices. That is, they were competent officials of diplomatic institutions trained through the processes of accumulating knowledge and experience in ‘Western affairs (洋務)’ and reforming the new government in the late Qing Dynasty. They versed in how to apply international public laws imported from the West in actual situations of negotiation. In particular, Fu Shi‐ying (富士英) was clearly aware of what it meant in the international society for China to attend and debate at international meetings. Furthermore, they fully recognized the nature of perpetual lease and ownership in international public laws, and drew out successful negotiations through debating on whether agenda such as protocols and memorandums brought by Japan were interpreted and applied in accordance with the public laws. Lastly, features of modern China not found in the conventional description of Chinese modern history are observed. Since the Opium War, China had been counted as one of weak powers, and foreign negotiations always ended up with humiliating concessions. Since the late Qing Dynasty, in fact, China had made efforts to reform its systems and polices internally and to correct unequal treaties with foreign countries externally. Such efforts aimed to achieve the status of an ‘equal sovereign state’ in the international society. On the contrary, the issue of the abolishment of foreign settlements in Korea is interesting in that it was a negotiation led by Japan for correcting an unequal treaty with China. It seemed that there was not diplomacy for so‐called small powers, but at least in Chinese diplomacy against Japan in Korea surrounding the abolishment of foreign settlements, China struggled in its modern consciousness to protect the dignity of the state and the interests of Chinese residents living in Korea. As a consequence of the negotiation, furthermore, China reemerged as a state treated equally with other countries, namely, as a most favored nation. This is why after success in diplomatic negotiation with Japan, Acting Minister Ma Ting‐liang (馬廷亮) admired Consul General Fu Shi‐ying (富士英) for his diplomatic activities and said that the Republic of China had a future.
#조계교섭 #중국근대외교 #주조선중국총영사 #마정량 #부사영 #Negotiation over Chinese Settlements in Korea #Chinese modern diplomacy #the Chinese Consul General in Korea #Ma Tingliang #Fu Shi?ying

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (18)

참고문헌 신청
/ / 每日申報 1912.02.15; 1912.12.19; 1913.10.09; 1913.02.13; 1913.02.17;1913.02.26 google schola / / 總理各國事務衙門, 外務部, 北洋政府外交部, 全宗내 駐韓使館?, 朝鮮??, 中日關係:朝鮮中國租界 宗 / 臺灣中央硏究院近史所?案館館藏 google schola 中央硏究院近代史硏究所 / 1972 / 淸季中日韓關係史料 9 / 中央硏究院近代史硏究所 google schola 吳東之 / 1988 / 中國外交史 2: 中華民國時期, 1911-1949 / 河南人民出版社 google schola 國會圖書館立法調査局 / 1965 / 舊韓末條約彙纂(下卷) google schola

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0