지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
"The Korean Armed Forees have the responsibility of guarantee in the human rights and defense of national territory," says Korean Constitution Clause 5 Article 2.
We should prevent the military crimes and deter the breakout of the accident by making investigation activity thoroughly, because the criminal activities in the military affairs harm the battle ability. So we could find very important meanings in this respect on the study of way of development in the investigation in the military affairs.
But, under the law of current military law, military prosecution or other affairs are run according to the commander or for the strengthening of military disciplines, there has to be a reform in order to realize independence, fairness, military discipline and human rights in military investigations.
However, in the current normal society, the trend is that the government policies are run to divide the power and function of specific investigation organization, thus recent reform and the investigators are moving in the reverse trend direction. Therefore, the direction of the development of military investigation is guarantee of military control and protection of human rights and balance of these two so that the establishment purpose and ideology of military law can be reminded in order to realize fairness and justice.
In the general society nowadays, there is serious contrast between the prosecutor's office and the police regarding the "Investigation System Development". Police tries to get "Independent Investigation Right" and the prosecutor's office gets mad at the police's challenge and argues they should bring police's investigation organization and personnel into the prosecutor's control. They both present law theory, international cases and historical background as their reasons. This has great effect on the military police law and military prosecutor's office. Therefore, we hope the military system has the same mutual control and balance between the police and the prosecutor's office, and protects the human rights of the military personnel and the command of the commander.
We should prevent the military crimes and deter the breakout of the accident by making investigation activity thoroughly, because the criminal activities in the military affairs harm the battle ability. So we could find very important meanings in this respect on the study of way of development in the investigation in the military affairs.
But, under the law of current military law, military prosecution or other affairs are run according to the commander or for the strengthening of military disciplines, there has to be a reform in order to realize independence, fairness, military discipline and human rights in military investigations.
However, in the current normal society, the trend is that the government policies are run to divide the power and function of specific investigation organization, thus recent reform and the investigators are moving in the reverse trend direction. Therefore, the direction of the development of military investigation is guarantee of military control and protection of human rights and balance of these two so that the establishment purpose and ideology of military law can be reminded in order to realize fairness and justice.
In the general society nowadays, there is serious contrast between the prosecutor's office and the police regarding the "Investigation System Development". Police tries to get "Independent Investigation Right" and the prosecutor's office gets mad at the police's challenge and argues they should bring police's investigation organization and personnel into the prosecutor's control. They both present law theory, international cases and historical background as their reasons. This has great effect on the military police law and military prosecutor's office. Therefore, we hope the military system has the same mutual control and balance between the police and the prosecutor's office, and protects the human rights of the military personnel and the command of the commander.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 군 수사체계의 이론적 개관
Ⅲ. 군수사체계 개선안과 관련한 문제점
Ⅳ. 군 수사체계 발전방향
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
참고문헌 (14)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
정부의 ‘검·경 수사권 조정 합의안’에 대한 단상
민주법학
2018 .01
-
검찰과 경찰의 수사권 조정
중앙법학
2012 .06
-
사법경찰관에 대한 수사지휘검사의 범위에 관한 연구
경찰학연구
2011 .06
-
경‧검 수사권의 합리적인 조정에 관한 연구
비교형사법연구
2010 .01
-
경찰의 책임수사제와 자치경찰제
법과 정책연구
2005 .01
-
군사법제도의 개선방안
형사법연구
2005 .01
-
검사와 사법경찰의 의사소통 시스템 구축 방안
일감법학
2013 .01
-
구한말 검찰제도의 연혁과 사법경찰관과의상호관계 연구 : 법령검토를 중심으로
경찰학연구
2015 .03
-
사법경찰관리의 내사와 검사의 지휘
경찰학연구
2012 .06
-
現行 搜査權體制의 改善方案에 관한 硏究
법학연구
2006 .02
-
수사체제조정논의 재검토
저스티스
2007 .10
-
개정 군사법원법의 쟁점과 그 개선방안
형사법연구
2011 .01
-
군사법경찰관(헌병)의 직무집행 관련 법규 정비에 관한 연구
한국경찰학회보
2013 .01
-
수사권조정 신속처리법안에 대한 소고
한국경찰연구
2019 .01
-
검 · 경 수사권조정에 대한 비판적 분석: 2020. 2. 4.자 개정 형사소송법 및 검찰청법의 내용을 중심으로
형사정책연구
2020 .03
-
바람직한 검경 관계모델에 대한 연구
한국공안행정학회보
2014 .01
-
경찰권과 검찰권의 조정을 통한 ‘국가수사청’ 설치에 대한 시론
비교형사법연구
2018 .01
-
검찰수사의 문제점과 합리적 검경관계 - 개정 형사소송법과 제정 대통령령을 중심으로 -
한국경찰연구
2012 .01
-
군사법제도 발전방향 모색을 위한 연구
한국경찰학회보
2017 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-364-003968523