지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2006.8
- 수록면
- 191 - 235 (45page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
On the premise that reasonable life is possible and it can be realized only by democracy, this thesis has been developed with the following contentions. First, life can be reasonable as Habermas insists in his communicative action theory which informs the social actions can be controllable through the agreement between the members in society. Second, the reasonable life must be based on the autonomous principle in the philosophy of enlightenment. After all, the self-control by the self-legislation is the only principle to order the modem life reasonably and this principle can be systemized by democracy.
In my thesis I tries to emphasize the political principle of enlightenment has been warped out for the liberal democracy in theory as well as in reality. Because the liberal democracy has justified the social inequality by way of underlining each individual's self-realization rather than the sense of solidarity in the social members.
In fact two axles ordering our life are freedom and equality. The harmonious relationship between freedom and equality can build the foundation of reasonable society. And the balanced relationship of freedom and equality makes the political autonomy, the principle of self-control by self-legislation, possible. Under liberal democracy freedom relates to the human right and equality to the sovereignty. Nonetheless, liberal democracy holds human right as the endowed right while it depreciates the sovereignty as a preference for the totalitarianism.
Habermas's communicative action theory promises one alternative to arbitrate social actions to the agreement of the social members. Besides I want to add the reasonable communitive action should be the basis for democracy. So it can be said Habermas's central theme, language has the inherent reasonableness, solidify the foundation of 'deliberative democracy' of western worlds these days.
I anticipate that Habermas's discourse democracy can be the alternative for the liberal democracy, which re-establishes the relationship between freedom and equality, or human right and sovereignty. As a political thinker who advocates discourse democracy, he argues the institutive condition of resonable sovereignty, namely, the concept of political power and the theory of constitutional state which is reshaped by his communicative action theory.
Following this, Habermas should be respected as a thinker of democracy, 'a liberally enlightened democrat', a democrat who does not ignore the freedom or human right. In his idea human right and sovereignty, freedom and equality are indissoluble one. He put the special stress on the deliberation as the ideal procedure of decision-making and understands it as the core of procedures in democracy. He considers the sound public opinion and opinion-formation process as something and emphasizes the activation of the informal public sphere. Habermas's democracy regards the right formation of sovereignty and its realization as the first considerations.
In my thesis I tries to emphasize the political principle of enlightenment has been warped out for the liberal democracy in theory as well as in reality. Because the liberal democracy has justified the social inequality by way of underlining each individual's self-realization rather than the sense of solidarity in the social members.
In fact two axles ordering our life are freedom and equality. The harmonious relationship between freedom and equality can build the foundation of reasonable society. And the balanced relationship of freedom and equality makes the political autonomy, the principle of self-control by self-legislation, possible. Under liberal democracy freedom relates to the human right and equality to the sovereignty. Nonetheless, liberal democracy holds human right as the endowed right while it depreciates the sovereignty as a preference for the totalitarianism.
Habermas's communicative action theory promises one alternative to arbitrate social actions to the agreement of the social members. Besides I want to add the reasonable communitive action should be the basis for democracy. So it can be said Habermas's central theme, language has the inherent reasonableness, solidify the foundation of 'deliberative democracy' of western worlds these days.
I anticipate that Habermas's discourse democracy can be the alternative for the liberal democracy, which re-establishes the relationship between freedom and equality, or human right and sovereignty. As a political thinker who advocates discourse democracy, he argues the institutive condition of resonable sovereignty, namely, the concept of political power and the theory of constitutional state which is reshaped by his communicative action theory.
Following this, Habermas should be respected as a thinker of democracy, 'a liberally enlightened democrat', a democrat who does not ignore the freedom or human right. In his idea human right and sovereignty, freedom and equality are indissoluble one. He put the special stress on the deliberation as the ideal procedure of decision-making and understands it as the core of procedures in democracy. He considers the sound public opinion and opinion-formation process as something and emphasizes the activation of the informal public sphere. Habermas's democracy regards the right formation of sovereignty and its realization as the first considerations.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 사회적 행위의 조정 원리로서의 의사소통행위
Ⅲ. 행위조정 원리와 사회질서
Ⅳ. 의사소통행위론과 규범의 정당화
Ⅴ. 결론
〈참고문헌〉
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
민주주의의 가능성 : '자유민주주의'에 대한 대안들
유럽연구
1998 .06
-
[동아시아연구]한국의 민주주의와 인권
민주주의와 인권
2001 .10
-
The Potentialities and Limitations for Chinese Democracy
국제정치논총
2004 .12
-
자유주의, 민주주의 그리고 자유민주주의
원광법학
2015 .01
-
민주주의에 대한 중국의 인식 : 비교 역사적 관점을 중심으로
아세아연구
2011 .09
-
자유민주주의의 공법적 고찰 : 민주주의 논쟁 중심으로
법학연구
2011 .12
-
Social and Adversarial Varieties of Democracy : Which One Produces Fewer Criminals?
Journal of Asian Sociology
2012 .12
-
민주적 이행 이후 필리핀 민주주의의 성격과 한계
동남아시아연구
2009 .01
-
Appraising the Quality of Democracy in South Korea: From the Perspectives of Ordinary Citizens and their Daily Experiences
Sungkyun Journal of East Asian Studies
2005 .01
-
공화민주주의모델의 헌법적 가치구성의 의의와 한계점
한양법학
2017 .11
-
민주주의와 다문화주의의 관계에 관한 이론적 검토
법교육연구
2019 .01
-
Social Conditions of Village Democracy in South Korea
Journal of Asian Sociology
2018 .03
-
Why Are South Korean Citizens Dissatisfied with Democracy?
비교민주주의연구
2019 .01
-
좋은 민주주의의 조건들: 가치, 절차, 목적, 관계 그리고 능력
비교민주주의연구
2014 .01
-
토크빌 민주주의론의 핵심 개념 분석 : 개념 형성사와 분석적 재구성을 중심으로
국제학논총
2018 .12
-
Mature Enough For Democracy, And Sensible Too
Global Asia
2007 .09
-
현대 자유민주주의 논쟁의 정치철학적 고찰
유럽연구
1998 .06
-
Deliberative Democracy의 한국적 수용과 시민의회 : 숙의, 심의, 토의라는 번역을 중심으로
현대정치연구
2018 .04
-
한국사회의 네트워크화와 직접 민주주의 가능성에 관한 이론적 고찰
한국동북아논총
2008 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-305-004006387