지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2006.8
- 수록면
- 237 - 285 (49page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper studies the process of democratic consolidation in Korea since 1987's democratic transition toward civic government and shows the lessons of consolidation for new leap of Korean democracy.
The way of democratizing Korean politics is that (l) 'Democratization by agreement between military and democratization influence and (2) economic success was democratization that occur from 'Crisis of success' that bring critical condition of political power of an authority.
Roh Tae-Woo government that centralizes power continuously in pro-democracy fight corresponds to transition period by democracy. Kim Young-Sam's civilian government sailing is left perfectly at power center since military party was withdrawn perfectly from centralize power. South Korea has succeeded in democratization transition without cutting or danger of system collapse. It is because it had more profitable condition at democracy consolidation flowing when character of transition period looks back upon historic experience that acted by important variable in unfolding process of hereafter. However, Kim Dae-Jung government as people's government that and Kim Young-Sam government as civilian government speak that failed passing over boundary of negative consolidation and advances active consolidation in Korea's democracy.
Korean democracy has achieved some success in procedural and formal side of democratic consolidation since civilian government departure, but democracy is not institutionalized and internalized in virtual side yet. Achieve Korean democracy Consolidation overcoming instability and fluidity of democratization process successfully in circumstance that outside condition of democracy changes rapidly by North Korea nucleus problem, democratic citizen relationship's development and change of politics culture for voluntary politics participation are essential. Citizen relationship and politics culture are expected that is evolved and need considerable time though sweep away remnants with authoritarian culture.
Stable society, new democracy welfare society that democracy consolidation is done and institutionalize is achieved, and role division between political society and civic society are achieved properly, and restraint and balance are made together and active interest of people total and continuous effort will have to be redoubled to do it so that democracy consolidation may be deepened still more, and necessity to grope structural innovation plan within synthetic system that is hereafter, country-politics society-civic society will be brought.
The way of democratizing Korean politics is that (l) 'Democratization by agreement between military and democratization influence and (2) economic success was democratization that occur from 'Crisis of success' that bring critical condition of political power of an authority.
Roh Tae-Woo government that centralizes power continuously in pro-democracy fight corresponds to transition period by democracy. Kim Young-Sam's civilian government sailing is left perfectly at power center since military party was withdrawn perfectly from centralize power. South Korea has succeeded in democratization transition without cutting or danger of system collapse. It is because it had more profitable condition at democracy consolidation flowing when character of transition period looks back upon historic experience that acted by important variable in unfolding process of hereafter. However, Kim Dae-Jung government as people's government that and Kim Young-Sam government as civilian government speak that failed passing over boundary of negative consolidation and advances active consolidation in Korea's democracy.
Korean democracy has achieved some success in procedural and formal side of democratic consolidation since civilian government departure, but democracy is not institutionalized and internalized in virtual side yet. Achieve Korean democracy Consolidation overcoming instability and fluidity of democratization process successfully in circumstance that outside condition of democracy changes rapidly by North Korea nucleus problem, democratic citizen relationship's development and change of politics culture for voluntary politics participation are essential. Citizen relationship and politics culture are expected that is evolved and need considerable time though sweep away remnants with authoritarian culture.
Stable society, new democracy welfare society that democracy consolidation is done and institutionalize is achieved, and role division between political society and civic society are achieved properly, and restraint and balance are made together and active interest of people total and continuous effort will have to be redoubled to do it so that democracy consolidation may be deepened still more, and necessity to grope structural innovation plan within synthetic system that is hereafter, country-politics society-civic society will be brought.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 민주주의 공고화와 국가-시민사회의 상호관계
Ⅲ. 한국의 사회성격과 민주화 이행과정
Ⅳ. 민주주의 공고화 과정에 관한 분석
Ⅴ. 한국 민주주의 공고화 확립 방안
Ⅵ. 결론
〈참고문헌〉
ABSTRACT
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
韓國 民主主義의 鞏固化
동북아시아문화학회 국제학술대회 발표자료집
2008 .04
-
민주화와 국가경쟁력의 조응성
경기논단
2004 .12
-
태국의 군부쿠데타와 민주주의로의 여정: 2006년 군부쿠데타 이후를 중심으로
한국태국학회논총
2014 .01
-
[동아시아연구]한국의 민주주의와 인권
민주주의와 인권
2001 .10
-
민주적 이행 이후 필리핀 민주주의의 성격과 한계
동남아시아연구
2009 .01
-
[창간기념논문]한국민주주의의 제약조건들
민주주의와 인권
2001 .04
-
민주주의의 가능성 : '자유민주주의'에 대한 대안들
유럽연구
1998 .06
-
민주화 이후 정치적 위기와 대응: 한국과 태국의 비교론적 함의
동남아시아연구
2008 .01
-
The Potentialities and Limitations for Chinese Democracy
국제정치논총
2004 .12
-
민주주의에 대한 중국의 인식 : 비교 역사적 관점을 중심으로
아세아연구
2011 .09
-
지자체 통합정책에 대한 한·일 비교 연구: 시·군 통합과 시·정·촌 합병을 중심으로
한국비교정부학보
2013 .01
-
한국민주주의 정착과정에서 국가와 노동의 관계변화
노동연구
1996 .08
-
한국 민주주의와 광주항쟁의 세 가지 의미
아세아연구
2007 .06
-
필리핀 선거제도의 내용과 평가 : 민주주의 공고화의 관점에서
동남아시아연구
2005 .01
-
필리핀 민주화 이행과 대중들의 정치적 인식
동남아연구
2014 .01
-
Appraising the Quality of Democracy in South Korea: From the Perspectives of Ordinary Citizens and their Daily Experiences
Sungkyun Journal of East Asian Studies
2005 .01
-
Why Are South Korean Citizens Dissatisfied with Democracy?
비교민주주의연구
2019 .01
-
현대 자유민주주의 논쟁의 정치철학적 고찰
유럽연구
1998 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-305-004006392