지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper aims to reexamine the meaning of the Kwangju Uprising from the vantage point of the Korea's experience of new democracy for twenty years. The Uprising in 1980 is evaluated by the three stages for the evolving democracy. The first of the three is the transition from the authoritarian rule to democracy; the second is the consolidation of democracy; and the third is the Kwangju's legacy that can be interpreted in terms of a prospect which to bring about a robust development of Korea's democracy. No doubt, the view that the Uprising was the principal source of democratization in Korea is widely shared, and it is definitely correct.
But the important question is the way in which how the Uprising is understood. In this sense the discourse regarding the Uprising is crucially important and is closely related with the current feature and the state of today's democracy. The spirit of the Uprising has been the source hardly to be dried up for the social movement not only in the course of democratization during the 1980s but also in its aftermath. With the demobilization of movement for democracy the grand discourses like 'nation(Minjok),' 'de mocracy(Minju),' and 'people(Minjung)' have inevitably declined. Nevertheless, among others the discourse of 'people' has been almost disappeared after the democratic consolidation. The paper emphasizes that the people discourse is the most important one for making Korea's democracy more robust and take root in the broader social strata.
Today the disenchantment with democracy is widely spreading out general public. Democracy has not been so efficacious that it has failed to bring about substantive results more or less to redress the economic difficulties caused by the neoliberal globalizaton. The meaning and ideal of democracy is not circumscribed by the meaning attended with the notions of democratic transition and consolidation. The spirit of the Uprising does also exert an enduring influence on the people's efforts to realize and broaden socio-economic citizenship. And this effort can centrally be carried out by political parties whose development is on the political agenda of the high priority. This is the most important legacy of the Kwangju Uprising, with a particular emphasis on the discourse of people.
But the important question is the way in which how the Uprising is understood. In this sense the discourse regarding the Uprising is crucially important and is closely related with the current feature and the state of today's democracy. The spirit of the Uprising has been the source hardly to be dried up for the social movement not only in the course of democratization during the 1980s but also in its aftermath. With the demobilization of movement for democracy the grand discourses like 'nation(Minjok),' 'de mocracy(Minju),' and 'people(Minjung)' have inevitably declined. Nevertheless, among others the discourse of 'people' has been almost disappeared after the democratic consolidation. The paper emphasizes that the people discourse is the most important one for making Korea's democracy more robust and take root in the broader social strata.
Today the disenchantment with democracy is widely spreading out general public. Democracy has not been so efficacious that it has failed to bring about substantive results more or less to redress the economic difficulties caused by the neoliberal globalizaton. The meaning and ideal of democracy is not circumscribed by the meaning attended with the notions of democratic transition and consolidation. The spirit of the Uprising does also exert an enduring influence on the people's efforts to realize and broaden socio-economic citizenship. And this effort can centrally be carried out by political parties whose development is on the political agenda of the high priority. This is the most important legacy of the Kwangju Uprising, with a particular emphasis on the discourse of people.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
Ⅱ. 광주항쟁은 민주주의로의 이행에서 무엇이었나?
Ⅲ. 광주항쟁은 민주주의의 공고화에서 무엇이었나?
Ⅳ. 광주항쟁은 민주주의에 대한 실망의 시기에 어떻게 이해될 수 있나?
Ⅴ. 맺는말
참고문헌
abstract
참고문헌 (11)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
지역에서의 5ㆍ18 연구 : 연구사 및 연구내용에 대한 비판적 검토를 중심으로
지역사회연구
2009 .09
-
[5·18연구]5월 항쟁의 문학적 재현 양상
민주주의와 인권
2003 .10
-
촛불항쟁과 현 단계 한국 민주주의의 과제
민주사회와 정책연구
2009 .01
-
The Potentialities and Limitations for Chinese Democracy
국제정치논총
2004 .12
-
민주주의에 대한 중국의 인식 : 비교 역사적 관점을 중심으로
아세아연구
2011 .09
-
[5·18연구]광주항쟁과 한국정치의 민주화-탈군부정치의 역사결정적 국면의 원천으로서 광주항쟁-
민주주의와 인권
2001 .04
-
민주주의의 가능성 : '자유민주주의'에 대한 대안들
유럽연구
1998 .06
-
민주적 이행 이후 필리핀 민주주의의 성격과 한계
동남아시아연구
2009 .01
-
[5·18연구]5·18항쟁의 성격·주체-연구사적 측면에서-
민주주의와 인권
2004 .10
-
5.18, 민주주의 위기 그리고 유럽한인의 대응양상
Crisisonomy
2013 .01
-
[5·18연구]광주항쟁과 80년대의 사회운동문화-이념 및 가치를 중심으로-
민주주의와 인권
2003 .04
-
한국 민주주의의 이행과 공고화 과정 분석
사회과학연구
2006 .08
-
韓國 民主主義의 鞏固化
동북아시아문화학회 국제학술대회 발표자료집
2008 .04
-
Appraising the Quality of Democracy in South Korea: From the Perspectives of Ordinary Citizens and their Daily Experiences
Sungkyun Journal of East Asian Studies
2005 .01
-
[창간기념논문]한국민주주의의 제약조건들
민주주의와 인권
2001 .04
-
[동아시아연구]한국의 민주주의와 인권
민주주의와 인권
2001 .10
-
Social and Adversarial Varieties of Democracy : Which One Produces Fewer Criminals?
Journal of Asian Sociology
2012 .12
-
5･18항쟁의 명칭문제 : ‘광주’와 ‘민중’이라는 용어를 중심으로
민주주의와 인권
2015 .12
-
자유주의, 민주주의 그리고 자유민주주의
원광법학
2015 .01
-
Why Are South Korean Citizens Dissatisfied with Democracy?
비교민주주의연구
2019 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
[5·18연구]신군부의 광주항쟁 진압과 미국문제
박만규
민주주의와 인권
2003
.04
5ㆍ18 광주항쟁 이후 사회운동의 이데올로기 변화
김정한
민주주의와 인권
2010
.08
토론 광주항쟁의 역사적 성격과 80년대의 반미자주화투쟁
최장집
,
이종범
,
조희연
외 2명
역사비평
1989
.05
광주항쟁과 애국적 민주공화주의의 탄생 : 저항적 시민사회의 정체성 구성에 대한 구조해석학적 분석
신진욱
한국사회학
2011
.04
[5·18연구]'5·18' 광주항쟁과 1980~1990년대 한국 민주화운동
윤선자
민주주의와 인권
2005
.10
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-910-016760903