지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
As Iryeon raised a question in his work 'Samkuk Yusa' that the story of Mu dynasty was different from the story in 'Samkuk Sa', the existence of King Mu discords with that of Seodong and Mireuk Temple history, the history of Karam, may be hard to believe the Mireuk Temple folk tale as well.
Based on the fact that the record of Mu dynasty in 'Samkuk Yusa' is a falk tale and that it is a kind of an oral tradition which value variableness and fictitiousness, it can be easier to discuss the following facts.
First, it is quit natural that 'Sari-BongAn Record' and 'Seodong Tale' give different information about the establishment of Mireuk Temple each other, because the former is written by historical facts and the latter is a creative literature work which people made up later days.
Second, keeping in mind the fact that the main group between the founders of Mireuk Temple and the transmitters of Seodong Tale are different, it is clear to explain the different view point between from Sari-BongAn Record and from the falk tale. The founder of Mireuk Temple demonstrated a prayer for the health of kings and queens and prosperity of Buddhism in the purport of Sari-BongAn Record. On the other hand, the successors of Seodong Tale seemed to escape from tedious Shilla-Baekche war through fictitious tale in which a princess of Shilla became a queen of Baekche.
Third, taking a look at an oral tradition 'Pesa Tale', people's desires for Mireuk Temple become more definite. In this tale, there is a story about gold cats which were made in order to exterminate rampant rats in Mireuk Temple. This shows people's rebuke toward tyranny of Mireuk Temple and legendary revenge against Buddhism or ruling class.
Based on the fact that the record of Mu dynasty in 'Samkuk Yusa' is a falk tale and that it is a kind of an oral tradition which value variableness and fictitiousness, it can be easier to discuss the following facts.
First, it is quit natural that 'Sari-BongAn Record' and 'Seodong Tale' give different information about the establishment of Mireuk Temple each other, because the former is written by historical facts and the latter is a creative literature work which people made up later days.
Second, keeping in mind the fact that the main group between the founders of Mireuk Temple and the transmitters of Seodong Tale are different, it is clear to explain the different view point between from Sari-BongAn Record and from the falk tale. The founder of Mireuk Temple demonstrated a prayer for the health of kings and queens and prosperity of Buddhism in the purport of Sari-BongAn Record. On the other hand, the successors of Seodong Tale seemed to escape from tedious Shilla-Baekche war through fictitious tale in which a princess of Shilla became a queen of Baekche.
Third, taking a look at an oral tradition 'Pesa Tale', people's desires for Mireuk Temple become more definite. In this tale, there is a story about gold cats which were made in order to exterminate rampant rats in Mireuk Temple. This shows people's rebuke toward tyranny of Mireuk Temple and legendary revenge against Buddhism or ruling class.
목차
1. 머리말
2. 역사와 설화의 거리
3. 서동설화의 허구적 진실
4. 서동설화의 정체성
5. 맺음말
참고문헌
참고문헌 (26)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
경주 남산 용장사지 석조여래좌상 연구
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2014 .06
-
미륵사와 서동설화
역사학보
2005 .12
-
미륵사지석탑 붕괴상태 고찰
헤리티지:역사와 과학
2005 .01
-
서동설화의 역사적 진실
역사학보
2010 .03
-
彌勒寺 創建의 歷史的 背景
한국사연구
2012 .12
-
서동설화의 주체 연구
온지논총
2011 .01
-
설화 읽기에 대한 반성적 고찰
어문연구
2008 .01
-
百濟 武王의 益山 경영과 彌勒寺
한국사학보
2009 .08
-
百濟의 馬韓 薯童(武康王) 神話 수용과 益山 彌勒寺
역사민속학
2012 .03
-
구비설화의 전래동화로의 재창작 방법
어문연구
2006 .01
-
The Winter's Tale에 나타난 聖書的 影響
Shakespeare Review
1994 .06
-
『겨울이야기』 속의 겨울이야기, 그리고 진짜 겨울이야기
Shakespeare Review
2020 .06
-
익산 미륵사지 서탑 <金製舍利奉安記> 해독과 쟁점들
동악어문학
2012 .02
-
彌勒寺址石塔 平面形式의 時代位置
헤리티지:역사와 과학
2004 .01
-
试说乡村社会与中国佛教寺院和僧人的互相 影响
헤리티지:역사와 과학
2012 .01
-
朝鮮時代 寺刹事蹟에 관한 檢討
경주사학
2006 .08
-
彌勒寺址 塔址의 調査過程에 대한 檢討
한국사학보
2009 .08
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-911-004317058