메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김미정 (홍익대학교)
저널정보
한국근현대미술사학회 한국근현대미술사학 한국근현대미술사학 제20집
발행연도
2009.12
수록면
206 - 227 (22page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In the 1960s and 1970s Korea at last became a member of the international community through the rapid national economic growth. As the underdevelopment country suffered from the tragic Korean War, it is characteristic that the nation’s industrialization had been towed by oppressive but efficient military government leadership. By going through a five-year plan for economic development plan, a lot of monuments were erected at the site of construction and land reclamation to commemorate the steel-like laborer’s courage and remember the historic moment. These monuments are the symbolic visual representation reflecting the people’s desire for the utopian future compensating for the past and present misery.
At that time from 1960s to 1970s, huge amounts of public monuments were built on the public sphere in Korea like as the statues of historic heros, war memorials or battle monuments, with which the industrial monuments take possession of the important parts of the Korean public art for enlightening people. On the contrary the former monuments are relevance to the nation’s historic identity, industrial monuments were concerned to the people’s practical life and vision. Industrial monuments of progress usually consist of the architectural tower, statues and relieves, at that time abstract geometric monument means the progress vision for future and the manly statues of laborer represents the reformed people apt to the moral required by the efficiently growing nation.
Citing several notable examples like Pusan Monument or Ulsan Industrial Monument, this thesis analyzed that who makes the industrial monument, what it consist of, and what is the effect to the public in the korean industrialization era. I examined that these public monuments representing utopian vision might be the role of statemobilization to oppress or discipline the people as well as the symbol of the pride of nation’s unprecedented rapid progress. And I will raise a question that these past ostentatious public art would be still appropriate at the post-industrialization era.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 경제발전의 금자탑 : 부산의 ‘부산직할시 승격 기념탑’과 울산의 ‘공업기념탑’
Ⅲ. ‘조국 근대화’를 위한 국민의 개조
Ⅳ. 국가의 규율과 신체의 정치학
Ⅴ. 산업화의 기념과 노스탤지어
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (44)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-600-000668692