메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김현화 (숙명여자대학교)
저널정보
한국미술연구소 미술사논단 美術史論壇 第42號
발행연도
2016.6
수록면
131 - 159 (29page)
DOI
10.14380/AHF.2016.42.131

이용수

DBpia Top 10%동일한 주제분류 기준으로
최근 2년간 이용수 순으로 정렬했을 때
해당 논문이 위치하는 상위 비율을 의미합니다.
표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In the 1960s and 1970s, the abstract art blossomed fully and the public art of government was actively producted. The May 16 military government carried out reform on the National Art Exhibition, to retire the senior artists who held on to the old way of figurative art and expand opportunities for young avant-garde artists.
The style of art informel, adopted from the Western art in protest of the feudalism in the Korean society, became the symbol of revolution and was given the same tasks with those of Park’s regime: growth, construction and progress. In the 1970s, the emphasis was put on history and tradition to strengthen the national identity and unity. Park’s regime led the production of ‘Documentary paintings(민족기록화)’ and public sculptures to bring to light the part of history or tradition that supported the national ideology. His ideology was also fully reflected in the National Art Exhibition. The movement of monochrome paintings emerged in Korea during the Yushin era and it helped the active development and use of the traditional thoughts and art media and materials that led to the establishment of the Korean modernism which resembles the discourse in the Korean democracy.
‘Art informel’ and ‘Monochrome paintings’ are, above all, from a pure perspective of art history, considered as one of the achievements of the Korean modern art, for they were developed in the efforts to keep pace with the international trends, as well as to adhere to Korea’s national identity. If art is viewed only in relations with politics, it may lead to mistake of overlooking its importance from a pure view of art history. However, it is difficult to discuss the Korean art in the 1960s and 1970s without connecting it with the regime’s awareness and policies of culture and arts, as it was a turbulent period that everything was caught in a maelstrom of political ideology.

목차

Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 5ㆍ16 군사정부와 추상미술의 咆號
Ⅲ. 민족문화와 전통의 재창조
Ⅳ. 나오는 말
참고문헌
ABSTRACT

참고문헌 (14)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-650-000802772