메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김동근 (전남대학교)
저널정보
원광대학교 인문학연구소 열린정신 인문학연구 열린정신 인문학연구 제14집 제1호
발행연도
2013.6
수록면
5 - 30 (26page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This thesis concerning the aesthetic directivity of 1920s poetics by relationship with formation logic of Korean Modern poetry. Concretely, this explores the terms of literary modernity that Korean Poetical circles were faced in 1920s, in other words it explores individual poet"s aesthetic directivity through the relation of Traditional-aesthetics and Symbol-aesthetics. Also, it examines the development process of Korean essay on Modern poetry based on mutual negotiation of Traditional-aesthetics and Symbol-aesthetics.
First, Kim-Eok"s essay which navigates "a Refined Poetic form" as a new tradition is reinterpreted in terms of correlation between symbol and tradition. Second, in the case of Kim-Sowol, it focuses on the establishment of a new tradition called "Poetical Spirit" as a matrix of language. Third, Baek-Daejin"s essay is organized as the subject of combination of symbol and life. Fourth, the main point of Hwang-seokwoo"s essay is that he tried to establish ethics of life by some ideal things like the order of nature.
In Korean Modern Poetical Circles, Traditional-aesthetics and Symbol-aesthetics are not mutually exclusive. In the process of Korean Modern poetry of 1920s securing autonomous region from the public spheres, they have formed a complementary and different directivity. This aspect is clearly contrasted to the point that the Korean essays on poetry of 1930s were developed forming a full-scale competition.

목차

1. 머리말
2. 1920년대 시의 미학적 상호교섭
3. 미학적 전망과 근대시론의 전개
4. 맺음말
[참고문헌]
Abstract

참고문헌 (3)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-000-002479975