메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Sang-Cheol Ahn (Kyung Hee University) Jung-Kil Han (Korea National University of Education)
저널정보
한국음운론학회 음성음운형태론연구 음성음운형태론연구 제16집 제1호
발행연도
2010.4
수록면
107 - 122 (16page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper reanalyzes the phonological alternation of the 15<SUP>th</SUP> century Middle Korean pre-final modesty suffix showing the various alternating forms, - s? p-,-z? p-, -c? p-,-s? β-, -z? β-, -c? β-,-s?m-, -z?m-, -c?m-, s’? β-, -z’? β-, -c’? β-, etc. As this suffix is no longer used in Modern Korean, there have been very few accounts on the phonological variations, compared with those on syntactic characteristics (H.-K. Kim 1947, Heo 1953, B.-H. Ahn 1961, C.-W. Park 1996, Y.-P. Kim 2002, etc.). There remains, however, a controversy over the underlying representation of this suffix in that those two segments /?/ and /β/ are extinct in the Modern Korean phonemic inventory. Based on this historical background, this paper attempts to analyze the phonological nature of this suffix from a new perspective. To this end, we propose an underspecified feature geometric representation of this pre-final suffix, reflecting the ambivalence of the initial and the final consonants. And this proposal for the underspecified representation is supported by various alternating forms. Finally, we conclude this paper by illustrating how the Middle Korean form has been changed to the Early Modern Korean variants in terms of the constraint ranking relationship and the change of hierarchy. Here we employ the combination tableau format (McCarthy 2008) in order to show the clear ranking relationship among the constraints.

목차

1. Introduction
2. Controversy over the segmental representation
3. Ambivalence in a feature-geometric account
4. Further developments
5. Concluding summary
REFERENCES

참고문헌 (28)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-710-001493190