메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
손연아 (단국대학교)
저널정보
한국환경교육학회 환경교육 環境敎育 第27卷 第4號
발행연도
2014.12
수록면
500 - 520 (21page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purpose of this study was to analyze differences between school directors" and teachers’ perceptions of ‘Education for Sustainable Development (ESD)’ and ESD School Evaluation for elementary and secondary schools. For this study, ‘Education for Sustainable Development Lens: A Policy and Practice Review Tool (Sustainable Schools Audit)’ by UNESCO(2010a) was used to evaluate schools. This tool has five domains of "Sustainable Schools Audit" such as "The Formal Curriculum, Social Sustainability, Ecological Sustainability, Economic Sustainability, Cultural Sustainability.’ The results showed that school directors" and teachers’ awareness levels on needs of ESD in schools were high. They also considered that ESD would help students develop integrative and creative thinking and build a good character. Meanwhile, they rated ‘The Formal Curriculum’ domain the lowest among five domains of the tool. Especially, elementary school directors and teachers rated all five domains of ESD school evaluation higher than secondary school directors and teachers did. Directors and teachers practicing ESD in their schools also recognized that educatonal environment for ESD was over ‘Fair.’ Future study needs to develop ‘ESD School Guidebook’ including the five domains of ‘Sustainable Schools Audit’ and help school directors and teachers set up ‘ESD School System’ on the basis of the guidebook.

목차

ABSTRACT
Ⅰ. 연구의 필요성 및 목적
Ⅱ. 연구 방법 및 절차
Ⅲ. 연구 결과 및 논의
Ⅳ. 결론 및 시사점
참고문헌

참고문헌 (22)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-374-001055569