지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Since the liberation, members of the Korean historical society have continued their efforts to purge all historical studies of certain remnants from the colonial days. In the process, imperialist invasion of the Korean peninsula, and the foundation of a nationalist state became the two topics that collected most of the scholars’ attention and devotion. Historical studies of Korean modern days maintained a perspective viewing those days and the Joseon government’s diplomatic policies through two concepts : ‘invasion’ and ‘resistance.’
In 2015, after 70 years have passed since the liberation of 1945, scholars are starting to examine those days from the perspectives of the people who actually lived the time. Previous studies concentrated upon examining the actions of the Joseon government, which supposedly tried to resist imperialist invasions and endeavored to maintain its own independence. These studies even expanded their examination to East Asian politics and diplomacy in general, trying to break free from the old perspective, viewing this period with the only two key words mentioned above, invasion and resistance. Yet the inside of Joseon, the actual process in which a policy would have been devised and employed, never garnered the attention it deserved. As a result, the changes that occurred in the Joseon government’s diplomatic policies in the 1880s were never fully examined. It was always assumed that the Joseon government was playing the defense all the time, and all policies of Joseon was a product of such passive stance. The reforms which were in progress since the early 1880s were never fully appreciated.
So in this article, the direction of such reforms, which continued up until 1894, is examined. Added to that is an analysis of the Joseon government’s diplomatic policy, of how it diverged, and how it all came together. Hopefully a correlation between domestic politics and diplomatic initiatives in the late 1880s could be determined and suggested.
In 2015, after 70 years have passed since the liberation of 1945, scholars are starting to examine those days from the perspectives of the people who actually lived the time. Previous studies concentrated upon examining the actions of the Joseon government, which supposedly tried to resist imperialist invasions and endeavored to maintain its own independence. These studies even expanded their examination to East Asian politics and diplomacy in general, trying to break free from the old perspective, viewing this period with the only two key words mentioned above, invasion and resistance. Yet the inside of Joseon, the actual process in which a policy would have been devised and employed, never garnered the attention it deserved. As a result, the changes that occurred in the Joseon government’s diplomatic policies in the 1880s were never fully examined. It was always assumed that the Joseon government was playing the defense all the time, and all policies of Joseon was a product of such passive stance. The reforms which were in progress since the early 1880s were never fully appreciated.
So in this article, the direction of such reforms, which continued up until 1894, is examined. Added to that is an analysis of the Joseon government’s diplomatic policy, of how it diverged, and how it all came together. Hopefully a correlation between domestic politics and diplomatic initiatives in the late 1880s could be determined and suggested.
목차
머리말
1. 주미전권공사 파견을 둘러싼 외교노선 갈등 : 연미와 친청
2. 연미노선의 굴절과 친청노선의 강화
맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (20)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
谷口園 鄭象觀의 『史記』 애호와 그 의의 -｢讀馬史｣ 및 南漢朝와의 왕복 서한을 중심으로-
한국한문학연구
2024 .08
-
중국소설 《西遊記》 번역본의 조선후기 유통에 관한 연구 : 영남대 소장 번역필사본을 중심으로
중국어문논역총간
2017 .01
-
1888년 ‘유아납치’ 소동의 전말과 각국의 대응
역사와현실
2018 .09
-
1930년대 중후반 식민지 조선 금융기구 개편론의 전개와 함의
한국사연구
2020 .09
-
Moving Beyond Politics: Western Scholarship on Joseon
Korea Journal
2021 .09
-
论“丙子之役”后朝鲜对清朝关系的实态 -以贡物变化情况为视角-
한중인문학연구
2015 .01
-
朝鮮通信使와 對馬島의 關係
日本語敎育
2017 .01
-
신미양요와 청의 조선 정책
중국근현대사연구
2021 .09
-
1915년 조선물산공진회에 나타난 식민 권력의 이미지 구축 시도 -미술관 전시를 중심으로
탐라문화
2020 .01
-
‘조선’ 국호로 본 여말선초의 역사인식과 이상국가론
역사와현실
2018 .06
-
1920년대 開闢社의 조선지식 수집과 조선연구 토대 구축 - ‘조선문화 기본조사’의 추진과정과 내용 분석을 중심으로
역사연구
2019 .06
-
1910~20년대 식민지 조선에서 개최된 공진회와 박람회의 성격
전북사학
2018 .01
-
조선후기 기자의 위상 변화와 조·청 외교에서의 활용 양상
국학연구
2023 .07
-
1930년대 전반 조선 미곡정책과 재조선일본인의 식민자본 ― ‘조선미곡창고주식회사’를 중심으로 ―
사림
2015 .01
-
柳宗悦の朝鮮理解の特質 ―朝鮮関連初期の著作を手がかりに―
일본문화학보
2020 .11
-
근대 초기 영문 잡지에 나타난 서양인의 ‘조선어’ 인식에 대하여 : The Korean Repository, The Korean Review를 중심으로
한국인물사연구
2016 .03
-
對馬島人 退去 이전의 朝日交涉
한일관계사연구
2017 .08
-
일제의 통계 조사와 조선인의 비판적 해석
사림
2015 .01
-
The Zhonghua Community Strategy in the Early Joseon Dynasty: The Establishment of Rituals and the Change in Ming’s Attitude toward Joseon
Korea Journal
2023 .12
-
김석범의 『만월(満月)』론 -제주4·3, 그 후로부터 50년-
일본문화학보
2022 .08
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-911-001610681