지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In Kush-nameh ( ??? ???? ), the institutions, customs, figures and thoughts of Silla are minutely reproduced to the extent it is difficult to be regarded as imagination of Persians. When the fragmental descriptions are interrelated with the similar motifs of Samgukyusa, an important historical clue in grasping the cultural exchange between Silla and Sasanian ( ???????? ) Persia can be obtained. The cultural shock Persia brought from Silla with which it had made cultural exchange through the Silk Road can be found in, first, Persian Buddhism, second, in exorcism custom which can be said to be the core of the Cheoyong heritage, and mysterious animal symbols.
The symbol of ‘Dragon’ which appears commonly in the diverse descriptions in Kush-nameh, the tale of Cheoyong, and Samgukyusa is originated from Persia. It can be seen that the ‘Dragon’ originated from Zoroastrianism changed, to the people of Silla, into a ‘foreigner’ from the sea, an object of mysterious marriage, or a person who brought political change or cultural wonder. The fact that ‘Dragon’ and ‘Lion’ which symbolized powerful royal authority and god-like power in Persia had permeated into the image of Cheoyong being acculturated into the folksy/Buddhistic elements of Korea is multi-laterally verified from the mythical/folksy/linguistical perspectives. From the fact that ‘Rahu’ originated from Persia was used to call Cheoyong, the effect of Persia permeated into Cheoyong heritage can be clearly confirmed.
By connecting several episodes of Kush-nameh and Samgukyusa like this, effective information in exploring the model of the motif of the figure who crossed the sea to come to Korea and got married to someone with a different nationality can be obtained. Though the rhetorical/religious colors of the two texts are different, when the diverse evidences in cultural history are supplemented for interpretation, the original material used for generation of the tale of Cheoyong can be assumed.
The symbol of ‘Dragon’ which appears commonly in the diverse descriptions in Kush-nameh, the tale of Cheoyong, and Samgukyusa is originated from Persia. It can be seen that the ‘Dragon’ originated from Zoroastrianism changed, to the people of Silla, into a ‘foreigner’ from the sea, an object of mysterious marriage, or a person who brought political change or cultural wonder. The fact that ‘Dragon’ and ‘Lion’ which symbolized powerful royal authority and god-like power in Persia had permeated into the image of Cheoyong being acculturated into the folksy/Buddhistic elements of Korea is multi-laterally verified from the mythical/folksy/linguistical perspectives. From the fact that ‘Rahu’ originated from Persia was used to call Cheoyong, the effect of Persia permeated into Cheoyong heritage can be clearly confirmed.
By connecting several episodes of Kush-nameh and Samgukyusa like this, effective information in exploring the model of the motif of the figure who crossed the sea to come to Korea and got married to someone with a different nationality can be obtained. Though the rhetorical/religious colors of the two texts are different, when the diverse evidences in cultural history are supplemented for interpretation, the original material used for generation of the tale of Cheoyong can be assumed.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 바닷길과 고대의 도래자들, 그리고 페르시아 불교
Ⅲ. 천연두의 도래와 역신(疫神) 퇴치 설화
Ⅳ. ‘용(龍)’의 상징과 ‘라후라처용(羅喉羅處容)아비’
Ⅴ. 결론
Works Cited
Abstract
참고문헌 (49)
참고문헌 신청
1. [단행본] - Kim, Bu-sik. / 1996 / Samguk Sagi / Publishing Company Eulumunhwa
2. [단행본] - کوش نامه / 2013 / Kush Nama / Publishing Company Chunga
3. [단행본] - Il-yeon / 1960 / Samguk Yusa / Publishing Company Kuahakwon
4. [단행본] - Kim, Myeong-jun / 2003 / Study on Akjang-gasa / Publishing Company Daunsaem
5. [단행본] - Kim, Myeong-jun / 2002 / Korea Sockyo Collection / Publishing Company Daunsaem
2. [단행본] - کوش نامه / 2013 / Kush Nama / Publishing Company Chunga
3. [단행본] - Il-yeon / 1960 / Samguk Yusa / Publishing Company Kuahakwon
4. [단행본] - Kim, Myeong-jun / 2003 / Study on Akjang-gasa / Publishing Company Daunsaem
5. [단행본] - Kim, Myeong-jun / 2002 / Korea Sockyo Collection / Publishing Company Daunsaem
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
처용설화와 처용 가무의 재인식-불륜과 체념으로 오해한 맥락과 「처용랑 망해사」조의 의미 연구-
국제언어문학
2021 .12
-
처용문화제를 통해 살핀 지역 설화 콘텐츠 활용 현황과 과제
어문학
2022 .12
-
처용설화의 사회서사와 소통 효과
문학치료연구
2018 .01
-
신라의 오방 관념과 〈처용가〉 형성 과정의 한 단서 : 신라 동악 토함산의 상징성과 그 변천을 고려하여
우리말글
2017 .12
-
『삼국유사』의 <처용랑과 망해사> 서사 연구
동방학
2019 .01
-
『삼국유사』 처용설화와 중국 門神文化의 영향
신라사학보
2020 .12
-
고전 자료 속 서역인들의 흔적과 시선의 양면성 一考
국학연구론총
2021 .12
-
처용설화의 정치신학적 해석 - 처용사건의 맥락사에 대한 철학적 이해 -
철학논총
2019 .07
-
신라 사상사 연구의 수렴과 확장 : (김복순, 2016, 『신라 사상사 연구』, 景仁文化社)
한국사학보
2019 .08
-
삼국유사 「처용랑망해사(處容郞望海寺)」조 깊이 읽기 - 울산광역시 처용문화제의 정체성과 관련하여 -
공연문화연구
2016 .02
-
『삼국유사』설화에 나타난 ‘공감’ 양상과 다문화교육적 의미
어문학
2015 .06
-
『삼국유사』의 편목과 일연(一然)의 신라 불교 인식
한국사상사학
2023 .04
-
『삼국유사』 龍聖 제거형 설화의 양상과 그 의미
국학연구론총
2015 .01
-
처용과 오이디푸스의 서사 비교 연구 : 주체의 저항과 변화 양상을 중심으로
비평문학
2018 .09
-
『삼국유사』 속 용 서사에 나타난 문화충돌과 문화적 공존에 대한 고찰
공존의 인간학
2023 .07
-
『삼국유사』용성(龍聖) 구현 설화의 양상과 그 의미
어문학
2015 .06
-
Rhetoric of Tradition in Multicultural/Globalized Societies : The Representation of the Other —The Case of Dutch Black Pete and Korean Cheoyong
동서비교문학저널
2015 .12
-
『三國遺事』와 스토리텔링 : 동서양 이야기의 비교를 중심으로
국제언어문학
2018 .04
-
김춘수의 『處容斷章』(1991)에 나타난 무의미시의 퇴행 양상 연구
한국문학논총
2022 .04
-
일본의 三國遺事 연구동향과 과제
동서철학연구
2019 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-800-001630887