지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study investigates the properties of VP-ellipsis(e.g., Anne made a cake. Lisa did too.) and one-substitution (e.g., Anne made a cake. Lisa made one too.) through the comprehension of these constructions by two groups of speakers: Korean-speaking L2 learners of English and native English speakers. According to Hankamer and Sag`s(1976) categorization, VP-ellipsis, as surface anaphora, is syntactically controlled, and one-substitution, as deep anaphora, is pragmatically controlled. Based on their dichotomous categorization, this study explores the characteristics of two types of anaphoric expression through empirical data gathered from the two participant group. The results reveal that comprehenders from both groups interpreted VP-ellipsis by reconstructing the verb phrase in the antecedent clause at the elided site with the help of syntactic parallelism. With regard to one-substitution, while most participants from both groups considered the anaphoric pronoun one as a higher N` In the antecedent clause, some Korean L2 learners understood one as referring to a lower N`. Although some Korean
participants showed different interpretations of one-substitution, most of them comprehended VP-ellipsis and one –substitution as native English speakers did. The findings of this study contribute to bridging the gap between theory and practice through exploring comprehenders` interpretation of anaphoric expressions.
participants showed different interpretations of one-substitution, most of them comprehended VP-ellipsis and one –substitution as native English speakers did. The findings of this study contribute to bridging the gap between theory and practice through exploring comprehenders` interpretation of anaphoric expressions.
목차
1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
3. The Study
4. Results
5. General Discussion
6. Conclusion
References
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
VP-fronting, VP-ellipsis, VP-anaphora and Phases
영어학
2015 .09
-
On English Verbal Anaphor: VP Replacement and VP Ellipsis
현대문법연구
2017 .01
-
Not Voice but Case Match Matters in VP Ellipsis and Pseudogapping of English
언어
2015 .06
-
MaxElide and Extraction out of VP Ellipsis in English
언어학 연구
2018 .10
-
Auxiliary Verbs and VP Ellipsis in English
영어학
2019 .12
-
Do it, do so, and VP-ellipsis
영어학
2016 .09
-
English VP ellipsis and a constraint on head movement
언어과학연구
2023 .09
-
When VP Ellipsis is Bled: Locative Inversion and Specificational Copulars
영어학
2021 .01
-
Non-finite VP ellipsis, Clefts, and Phase
생성문법연구
2019 .01
-
Extraction out of overt anaphora: Korean kule(h) 'so' versus English so
언어연구
2015 .01
-
On wh-extraction out of VP ellipsis bled by subject-auxiliary inversion
영어학
2016 .06
-
한국인 영어 학습자의 영어 생략문 태불일치문장 수용성 판단에 관한 연구
언어과학
2016 .01
-
Processing the focus particle only in Korean L2 English learners’ sentence comprehension
언어와언어학
2017 .01
-
VP Ellipsis Always Precedes Reprise Fragment Ellipsis
생성문법연구
2022 .02
-
Locative PP Extraction out of VP-ellipsis
영어학
2018 .06
-
Contextual anaphora relations in English nominal ellipsis
언어연구
2024 .03
-
A Syntactic Approach to the Mismatch in VP-ellipsis
영어학
2017 .07
-
Resolution of Ellipsis in Stacked VPs
영어학
2019 .09
-
Mismatches in Ellipsis: Category Mismatch Asymmetry in English VP-ellipsis
영어학
2020 .03
-
한국인 영어 학습자의 동사구 생략 구문 내 재귀사 해석에 관한 연구
언어과학
2016 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-700-002348910