메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
남장현 (인하공업전문대학)
저널정보
한국셰익스피어학회 Shakespeare Review Shakespeare Review Vol.52 No.3
발행연도
2016.9
수록면
353 - 376 (24page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This essay explores the widespread sense of frustration represented by a broad range of opposing images within The Two Noble Kinsmen and attempts to interpret how repeated human will to overcome it sets up an atmosphere of new creative dynamics.
Such a sense of frustration dominates the entire play. At the beginning, the hymen is full of contrary images that possibly taint the symbolic meaning of marriage as new life. When the three queens of Thebes appear onstage to appeal to Theseus, thereby interrupting his marriage to Hippolyta, that sense realizes as a solid fact within the domain of the play. In the scenes that follow, main characters reveal their wills and desires that are to be frustrated by an incomprehensible power of reality. Arcite and Palamon wish to escape from Thebes, detesting its corruption, but the imminent war saps their will. The Jailor’s Daughter feels entirely frustrated due to the unrewarded love from Palamon and Emilia cannot uphold her faith in chastity when she becomes the main prize for the tournament in which Arcite and Palamon fight for their beloved lady.
Under the duress of all this vexation, Arcite, Palamon, the Jailor’s Daughter and even Emilia become mad, or reach near a state of madness in the course of their desperate attempts to overcome the power of forces beyond their control. Their respective endeavors ultimately generate a circular structure in which they mirror each other. Such circularity manifests the reality that repeats and differs with its singularity. The reality is also an arena of clashing, fighting and coexisting contrarieties that cannot be grasped by reason alone. Indeed, it is a world of reason and unreason, of life and death, and of tragedy and comedy. In such a chaotic coexistence of opposing elements, the creative dynamics appear as the primary propelling force in the play, in the same manner the two playwrights exhibited their artistic rivalry.

목차

1. 들어가기
2. 의도와 좌절의 상반성
3. 좌절에 대한 저항과 상충의 생성 역학
4. 맺음말
인용문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (16)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-840-001345472