메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
高光敏 (漢陽大學校)
저널정보
중국어문학연구회 중국어문학논집 中國語文學論集 第102號
발행연도
2017.2
수록면
293 - 317 (25page)
DOI
10.25021/JCLL.2017.02.102.293

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Hanyu’s <Zhangzhongchengzhuanhouxu> describes Zhangxun and Xuyuan who lost their lives while defending Uiyancheng during the An-Shi Rebellion. Zhangxun and Xuyuan fought furiously against the enemies’ siege. They stood up to death despite insufficient food and had to eat human flesh to survive and keep fighting. But they were eventually killed after the castle fell to the enemy. Although they achieved the feat, some people criticized them for their strategic failures and inhumane acts of eating human flesh. Lihan wrote <Zhangxunzhuan> to the king to plead their innocence but the criticism did not disappear. Under these circumstances, Hanyu wrote <Zhangzhongchengzhuanhouxu> to argue for them. This research paper examines how Hanyu’s <Zhangzhongchengzhuanhouxu> has been passed down to 《Jiutangshu》and 《Xintangshu》. This study finds out that in 《Jiutangshu》the records of Zhangxun are very brief and neither explain the details of the situations in which they had to eat human flesh to survive nor provide adequate proof of Xuyuan’s betrayal. Furthermore, there is no evidence that 《Jiutangshu》makes reference to <Zhangzhongchengzhuanhouxu>. As a result, Zhangxun has been underestimated in 《Jiutangshu》. In contrast, 《Xintangshu》illustrates very different viewpoints from 《Jiutangshu》. It keeps the records of Zhangxun great in detail. It also provides further detailed explanations of the reasons why human flesh had to be eaten, their strategies were not failed, and there was no betrayal of Xuyuan. All these descriptions are in accordance with the arguments of <Zhangzhongchengzhuanhouxu>. In addition, 《Xintangshu》has many similarities with <Zhangzhongchengzhuanhouxu>. The book actually mentions the name of Hanyu to support his evaluation included in <Zhangzhongchengzhuanhouxu>. Consequentially, it praises Zhangxun for his performance regarding him as a man of virtue comparable to Baiyi and Shuqi. These facts prove that 《Xintangshu》has not only fully accepted <Zhangzhongchengzhuanhouxu> but also achieved the purpose of Hanyu’s writing <Zhangzhongchengzhuanhouxu> in admiration of Zhangxun.

목차

1. 들어가며
2. 張巡 사건의 顚末과 韓愈의 <張中丞傳後敍>의 내용
3. 《舊唐書》의 <張中丞傳後敍> 수용
4. 《新唐書》의 <張中丞傳後敍> 수용
5. 나오며
〈參考文獻〉
〈ABSTRACT〉

참고문헌 (15)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-820-002312331