지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The Demarcation of Goryeo territory was largely determined with dynastical awareness of northern territory which had been steadily formed since foundation of nation, and the central interest was based on the Yalu river. The point that Yalu coast was included in northern territorial awareness had a regular difference in respect of ideological and actual significance of domination. The way of realizing this was actualized through the institutional strategy of Yanggae(兩界) along with the concrete domination through construction of fortress. Northern territorial awareness during the early Goryeo can be said to have been conceptualized with Maheoltan(馬歇灘) and Seokseong(石城) of Yalu coast, mentioned in ChoiSeungro’s Simuchaek. It can be controversial whether Maheoltan was located, however concrete mention of Yalu river implies that the concept of Yalu river was regularly operated in the center of dynastical northern territorial awareness since foundation of Goryeo. The point when Yalu coast was entered in the actual domination of Goryeo was due to the 1st invasion of Khitan during Seongjong’s reign 12th year and the result of reconciliation conference between SeoHee and SoSonnyeong, the admiral of Khitan. It is determined that Ganghwa conference between Seo Hee and So Sonnyeong did not made a clear conclusion of demarcating border between the two countries, however a compromise to acknowledge domination of the two countries was made by dividing into Gangdong(江東) and Gangseo(江西) based on Yalu river.
The point that Goryeo acquired in the process of reconciliation with Khitan during the 12th year of Seongjong’s reign was above all regularization of advance into Yalu riverside. This not only realized identity of dynastical northern territorial awareness, but also secured stable regional base of border demarcation externally. This also was the basis to overcome two invasions of Khitan during Hyunjong’s reign, which contributed to firmness of norther region of Goryeo by constructing ‘Goryeojangseong’ during the reign of Deokjong.
On the other hand, the significance of reconciliation conference during the 12th year of Seongjong’s reign was generally named as acquisition of ‘Gangdong 6-ju’. However, the point when ‘Gangdong 6-ju’ became the focus of attention was during Hyunjong. Also, the intention of Goryeo"s royal court in the process of reconciliation conference implied the securement of justification of driving out the tribe of Yeojin between Goryeo and Khitan. Of course, it is not clear the scope of drive out of the tribe of Yeojin, realization of this was an important issue of northern stabilization of Goryeo. Accordingly, the researcher considers it is necessary to emphasize the significance of border demarcation through advance into Yalu riverside next to drive out of Yeojin, rather than symbolizing the output of reconciliation conference between Goryeo and Khitan as ‘Gangdong 6-ju’.
The point that Goryeo acquired in the process of reconciliation with Khitan during the 12th year of Seongjong’s reign was above all regularization of advance into Yalu riverside. This not only realized identity of dynastical northern territorial awareness, but also secured stable regional base of border demarcation externally. This also was the basis to overcome two invasions of Khitan during Hyunjong’s reign, which contributed to firmness of norther region of Goryeo by constructing ‘Goryeojangseong’ during the reign of Deokjong.
On the other hand, the significance of reconciliation conference during the 12th year of Seongjong’s reign was generally named as acquisition of ‘Gangdong 6-ju’. However, the point when ‘Gangdong 6-ju’ became the focus of attention was during Hyunjong. Also, the intention of Goryeo"s royal court in the process of reconciliation conference implied the securement of justification of driving out the tribe of Yeojin between Goryeo and Khitan. Of course, it is not clear the scope of drive out of the tribe of Yeojin, realization of this was an important issue of northern stabilization of Goryeo. Accordingly, the researcher considers it is necessary to emphasize the significance of border demarcation through advance into Yalu riverside next to drive out of Yeojin, rather than symbolizing the output of reconciliation conference between Goryeo and Khitan as ‘Gangdong 6-ju’.
목차
1. 머리말
2. 영토의식과 성곽 축조
3. 국경 분쟁과 ‘강동 6주’
4. 맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (27)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
고려･거란 전쟁 시기 동북아 국제질서가 女眞에 미친 영향에 대하여
만주연구
2024 .04
-
영토, 경계 및 영토 주권에 대한 역사적 고찰
동아법학
2018 .11
-
여진, 夷狄에서 고려의 변경민으로 ‒『고려사 』를 통해 본 고려의 여진 인식과 관리‒
만주연구
2024 .04
-
거란대자(契丹大字) 자료(資料)와 연구현황(硏究現況)
몽골학
2021 .01
-
거란문자의 자료와 연구현황
몽골학
2015 .01
-
高麗時期 重陽節 관련 漢詩의 중국 고전시 수용 양상 연구
중국학보
2017 .01
-
关于契丹大、小字的区别
몽골학
2019 .01
-
고려 一品軍 三品軍에 관한 새로운 자료의 소개와 분석
동북아시아문화학회 국제학술대회 발표자료집
2016 .07
-
契丹语基数词“一、四、五”及其他
몽골학
2019 .01
-
고려시기 전라도의 역사
호남학
2021 .12
-
소련 해체 후 중국-중앙아시아 3국 국경 획정 분석 1991~2011 : ‘분리주의’ 문제와 분쟁지역을 중심으로
아시아연구
2021 .11
-
Goryeo Celadon as a Diplomatic Gift in the Late Joseon and Modern Periods
Korea Journal
2024 .06
-
청말･민국시기 중국의 ‘고려’ 호칭 사용과 의미
인문사회 21
2023 .06
-
契丹语动词“适”考
몽골학
2018 .01
-
‘Look at the Alcohol If You Want to Know the Country’: Drinking Vessels as a Cultural Marker of Medieval Korea
Acta Via Serica
2019 .12
-
지방적 주체의 경계만들기: 대만과 한국의 미시적 경계작업을 사례로
공간과 사회
2021 .09
-
契丹博物馆藏契丹小字碑刻残石
몽골학
2016 .01
-
북·중 국경관리제도의 특징과 시사점
국가안보와 전략
2019 .01
-
EU 국경관리제도 운용을 위한 EU의 입법적 역할 연구
비교법연구
2022 .04
-
거란대자(契丹大字) 동사 연결어미(動詞連結語尾)의 초보적 연구
몽골학
2020 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-390-001663872