지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study is going to figure out difference between Yu Hua and Lee Mun-yeol regarding their recognition of violence. It is a meaningful attempt to understand the ideological gap between the two authors and examine the detailed aspects of violence in the two countries which their ideological discourse is grounded on.
In the 1980’s, Lee Mun-yeol began his journey of literature and created works actively, and it was the period that started with the Gwangju Democratic Movement against the military dictatorship. The 1980’s was the period when culture and ideology represented as ‘the National People’s Movement’ were prevalent; however, even in the circumstances, Lee Mun-yeol tried to dig deeply into the ultimate meaning of humans, not historic realism. As what is written on his novels, Lee Mun-yeol did not put his trust in the crowd realizing any true revolution even under the democratic system. He thinks that the people can never be the main agents of history due to their snobbish and selfish nature, and who grasps authority does not matter as authority will spoil, and the people will lead their lives according to that. He maintained that tendency consistently, and it is revealed in other works like 『Son of a Man』, too. On account of his tendency of writing works like that, Lee Mun-yeol was criticized by some critics as being “a conformer to the system”.
On the contrary, Yu Hua did show changes gradually. In the 1990’s, he transferred from demagogic literature to folk literature. This is not unassociated with Yu Hua’s experience of Tiananmen Massacre in 1989. Although they failed to bring revolution, Yu Hua found individuals’ power and potential through the explosion of the people’s energy and cohesiveness then.
Despite that enormous alteration, however, in Yu Hua’s novels, the people are still depicted as the victims of violence within the great tide of history and fragile individuals that can never escape from the bonds of destiny no matter how hard they try. They just appear to suffer pathetically and desperately in order to survive as a human that is more humane. Yu Hua focuses on the people’s joys and sorrows more like this while Lee Mun-yeol pays more attention to snobbery internalized in the crowd. But the aspects of violence cannot but
In the 1980’s, Lee Mun-yeol began his journey of literature and created works actively, and it was the period that started with the Gwangju Democratic Movement against the military dictatorship. The 1980’s was the period when culture and ideology represented as ‘the National People’s Movement’ were prevalent; however, even in the circumstances, Lee Mun-yeol tried to dig deeply into the ultimate meaning of humans, not historic realism. As what is written on his novels, Lee Mun-yeol did not put his trust in the crowd realizing any true revolution even under the democratic system. He thinks that the people can never be the main agents of history due to their snobbish and selfish nature, and who grasps authority does not matter as authority will spoil, and the people will lead their lives according to that. He maintained that tendency consistently, and it is revealed in other works like 『Son of a Man』, too. On account of his tendency of writing works like that, Lee Mun-yeol was criticized by some critics as being “a conformer to the system”.
On the contrary, Yu Hua did show changes gradually. In the 1990’s, he transferred from demagogic literature to folk literature. This is not unassociated with Yu Hua’s experience of Tiananmen Massacre in 1989. Although they failed to bring revolution, Yu Hua found individuals’ power and potential through the explosion of the people’s energy and cohesiveness then.
Despite that enormous alteration, however, in Yu Hua’s novels, the people are still depicted as the victims of violence within the great tide of history and fragile individuals that can never escape from the bonds of destiny no matter how hard they try. They just appear to suffer pathetically and desperately in order to survive as a human that is more humane. Yu Hua focuses on the people’s joys and sorrows more like this while Lee Mun-yeol pays more attention to snobbery internalized in the crowd. But the aspects of violence cannot but
목차
Ⅰ. 서언
Ⅱ. 합리적인 아버지의 부재와 불합리한 폭력의 생성
Ⅲ. 이문열의 말을 하는 군중과 위화의 침묵하는 군중
Ⅳ. 결론을 대신하여 : 이문열과 위화의 “폭력미학”과 변모양상
참고문헌
【논문초록】
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Academia and Cultural Production: Yu Dan and Her Confucius from the Heart: Ancient Wisdom for Today's World
Sungkyun Journal of East Asian Studies
2015 .01
-
조선시대 전래된 태평천국 시기 연화(年畵) 화조화
한국민화
2019 .04
-
Can Yoon Suk-yeol Use His Outsider Reputation to Move South Korea Forward?
Global Asia
2022 .06
-
Outlook for the Yoon Suk Yeol Administration’s China Policy and Policy Recommendations
IFANS FOCUS
2022 .06
-
이문열과 아나키스트 자유주의
사회와이론
2016 .05
-
Mun Ye-bong, a Partisan Maiden in a “Partisan State”
Korea Journal
2020 .09
-
1987년 6월 민주항쟁과 이한열
민주주의와 인권
2019 .06
-
가정 내 정서적 폭력에 대한 개념적 이해와 피해자 보호
피해자학연구
2020 .01
-
화이역어 페르시아어편 문헌분석의 중요성과 연구 방향성 고찰
한국중동학회논총
2018 .01
-
젠더기반폭력의 피해자 맥락성에 관한 담론
한국치안행정논집
2020 .01
-
학교폭력 예방을 위한 경기도의 역할
정책연구
2017 .08
-
宋時烈의 ≪楚辭≫ 수용 연구 — ≪宋子大全≫ 속 漢詩를 중심으로
중국학논총
2024 .03
-
사무직 근로자의 직장폭력피해경험 연구– ‘폭력풍토(Violence Climate)’를 중심으로 -
한국공안행정학회보
2018 .01
-
India’s Growing Strategic Clout and Implications for the Yoon Suk Yeol Government
IFANS FOCUS
2022 .06
-
The Yoon Suk Yeol Administration’s Policy toward Japan and ROK-Japan Relations: Assessment and Outlook
IFANS FOCUS
2022 .08
-
정치와 폭력 : 공존의 (불)가능성 모색
국제정치연구
2019 .09
-
학교폭력예방 및 대책에 관한 법률의 문제점 고찰
인문사회 21
2018 .01
-
폭력과 사회의 기원에 관한 논고 - 법학에서 폭력론과 비폭력론의 합일 지양 가능성 -
법학연구
2020 .03
-
대구지역 데이트폭력의 실태 및 요인 분석
치안정책연구
2018 .01
-
폭력의 제어 수단으로서 윤리, 종교, 법에 관한 논증
법학연구
2019 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
현대소설에 나타난 내러티브의 엮임과 플롯 짜기의 양상 - 「우리들의 일그러진 영웅」, 「아우를 위하여」, 「우상의 눈물」, 「소년 시대」를 대상으로
오영록
비평문학
2021
.12
딜레마 서사를 통한 글쓰기 융합 교양 교육 : 이문열의 ｢우리들의 일그러진 영웅｣을 중심으로
최강민
교양학연구
2017
.12
작별
한강
문학과사회
2017
.11
1950년대 『사상계』와 전후 신세대 오상원의 휴머니즘
최애순
우리문학연구
2018
.01
식민지 조선인 청년의 이동과 시선 : 이광수의 『무정』과 염상섭의 『만세전』을 중심으로
오태영
한국학연구
2017
.06
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0