메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김태현 (국방대학교)
저널정보
국방부 군사편찬연구소 군사 군사 제108호
발행연도
2018.9
수록면
37 - 81 (45page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purpose of this article is to analyze how to develop a military strategy and build military forces especially focusing on the conventional forces of nuclear armed states as a comparative case study of Pakistan, based upon a force planning framework of strategy driven model. This paper will examine a trend of conventional forces after and before possessing nuclear weapons and clarify how to build conventional forces in rivalry with Indian border threats. I have two arguments in this study. Firstly, this article argues that pakistan does not reduce conventional forces even after developing nuclear weapons which has only a limited security effectiveness. This causes a little nuclear substitution effect. Secondly, pakistan is developing its own military strategy based on a ‘nuclear-conventional interplay’, which priority mostly lies in building a strong land forces. This aims to address a possible surprise attack from india conceptualized as a Cold-Start Doctrine. This military strategy deals with a limited conventional attack in the nuclear shadow to penetrate pakistan’s territory by cutting a military mobilization time and elevating a military readiness. To address an indian blitzkrieg-like CSD, Pakistan has developed a Full-Spectrum Deterrence nuclear strategy on the one hand, and a New Concept for Warfighting conventional strategy on the other hand. Accordingly, Pakistan is increasing tactical nuclear weapons including low-yield nuclear weapons and delivery systems, and modernizing joint operation capabilities in order to implement its military strategy. After all, this paper will argue that a strategy-driven force planning model is to be estimated an useful tool to explain nuclear armed states’ force planning and conventional forces in the shadow of nuclear weapons still key factor to deter and address multiple external threats. In Conclusion, this paper provided some implications for north Korean military development.

목차

1. 머리말
2. 이론적 논의: 핵무장국의 전력기획
3. 파키스탄의 군사전략
4. 파키스탄의 군사력 건설
5. 결론: 평가와 함의
〈참고문헌〉
〈Abstract〉

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0