메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Yeon Hee Choi (Ewha Womans University) Herim Ahn (Ewha Womans University) Jinyoung Lee (Ewha Womans University)
저널정보
한국영어학회 영어학 영어학 Volume.18 Number.4
발행연도
2018.12
수록면
395 - 422 (28page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper aims to investigate L2 learners’ strategies for anaphora resolution in reading by L2 proficiency levels and academic backgrounds and by anaphora types and inferential complexity levels of anaphoric ties. Data was collected using think-aloud protocols and mouse movements captured on the computer screen of 16 Korean EFL college students performing an anaphora resolution test. The participants were recruited from two proficiency levels and two academic disciplinary areas. Results revealed dominant anaphora resolution strategies shared by the participants due to the nature of anaphora resolution and simulated testing context, such as reading the prior sentence and translating the target sentence, regardless of anaphora types. Yet, they also presented variations in anaphora resolution strategy use by anaphora and reader variables. For pronouns with low ties the L2 students relied on reference chains, whereas syntactic constraints were prevalently deployed for pronouns with high ties. For demonstrative adjectives with low ties repeated noun phrases were preferred antecedents, while use of world knowledge and topic preference appeared as frequent strategies for those with high ties. The lower level students preferred to use semantic knowledge; the higher level ones utilized syntactic and discourse knowledge. The science majors tended to focus on local sentences, while the humanities majors, especially the higher-level students, read the whole passage before identifying the antecedent. Findings from the study suggest certain strategies are preferred depending on anaphora types and levels of ties as well as L2 learners’ proficiency levels and academic backgrounds.

목차

1. Introduction
2. Anaphora Resolution Factors and Previous Studies in L2 Reading
3. Research Method
4. Results and Discussion
5. Conclusion and Implications
References

참고문헌 (50)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0