개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 한국사연구회 한국사연구 韓國史硏究 제183집
- 발행연도
- 2018.12
- 수록면
- 239 - 285 (47page)
- DOI
- 10.31791/JKH.2018.12.183.239
이용수
DBpia Top 5%동일한 주제분류 기준으로최근 2년간 이용수 순으로 정렬했을 때
해당 논문이 위치하는 상위 비율을 의미합니다.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The viewpoint of Koryo rulers as nobles was a widespread idea since the Japanese occupation. However, under the influence of criticism of colonial history and the internal development theory in the 1960s, it became common view after arguing over aristocracy and bureaucracy in the 1970s.
The representative books of Korean history from liberation to the 1950 understood that the Koryo rulers were nobles and ancient and Joseon were nobles too, and could not explain the development of Korean history and the change of the ruling class because it could not escape from the influence of colonial history. They understood all the rulers of Korean history as nobles and could not explain the characteristics of the Koryo noble.
As the internal development theory of the 1960s was formed, the theory of the aristocracy became an important viewpoint to explain the Koryo society. The understanding of the elements of the theory of the aristocracy has been broadened, and the study of the privileged merit land and the protected appointment has been done. In order to explain the historical status of the Koryo aristocracy, the ruling classes of the Korean history were distinguished, and the ancient and Koryo were called nobles and the Joseon was gentry.
In the 1970s, arguing for the aristocracy and the bureaucracy were discussed. The bureaucratic theory emphasized the civil service examination and said that Koryo was not an aristocracy, and that the privileged merit land was not the economic basis of the aristocracy. The theory of the aristocracy said that the civil service examination and the protected appointment are complementary to each other but the protected appointment plays a basic role and the civil service examination is not a system that selects only by skill. The bureaucratic theory, however, refuted that civil service examination is done in the class system, but acceptance is by proficiency, and that the protected appointment is not guaranteed for future promotion because it gives the first office. In this process, the theory of the aristocracy was established, but the controversy was not over, and the theory of the pedigree society was claimed.
The theory of aristocracy has many problems. In Koryo, it is hard to see that there were nobles with autonomous status in the bureaucratic order. The standard of the protected appointment is not noble or pedigree but status in bureaucracy. The privileged merit land was accepted the step theory, the civil service examination was not a particularly advantageous system for noble or pedigree. The ruling class in Koryo is not the aristocracy but the bureaucracy, the pedigree was the family that had discharged the high-ranking officials through several generations.
The representative books of Korean history from liberation to the 1950 understood that the Koryo rulers were nobles and ancient and Joseon were nobles too, and could not explain the development of Korean history and the change of the ruling class because it could not escape from the influence of colonial history. They understood all the rulers of Korean history as nobles and could not explain the characteristics of the Koryo noble.
As the internal development theory of the 1960s was formed, the theory of the aristocracy became an important viewpoint to explain the Koryo society. The understanding of the elements of the theory of the aristocracy has been broadened, and the study of the privileged merit land and the protected appointment has been done. In order to explain the historical status of the Koryo aristocracy, the ruling classes of the Korean history were distinguished, and the ancient and Koryo were called nobles and the Joseon was gentry.
In the 1970s, arguing for the aristocracy and the bureaucracy were discussed. The bureaucratic theory emphasized the civil service examination and said that Koryo was not an aristocracy, and that the privileged merit land was not the economic basis of the aristocracy. The theory of the aristocracy said that the civil service examination and the protected appointment are complementary to each other but the protected appointment plays a basic role and the civil service examination is not a system that selects only by skill. The bureaucratic theory, however, refuted that civil service examination is done in the class system, but acceptance is by proficiency, and that the protected appointment is not guaranteed for future promotion because it gives the first office. In this process, the theory of the aristocracy was established, but the controversy was not over, and the theory of the pedigree society was claimed.
The theory of aristocracy has many problems. In Koryo, it is hard to see that there were nobles with autonomous status in the bureaucratic order. The standard of the protected appointment is not noble or pedigree but status in bureaucracy. The privileged merit land was accepted the step theory, the civil service examination was not a particularly advantageous system for noble or pedigree. The ruling class in Koryo is not the aristocracy but the bureaucracy, the pedigree was the family that had discharged the high-ranking officials through several generations.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 논쟁 이전 귀족제설의 내용과 특징
Ⅲ. 귀족제설-관료제설 논쟁과 통설의 정립
Ⅳ. 귀족제설에 대한 평가와 전망
Ⅴ. 맺음말
참고문헌
ABSTRACT
참고문헌 (70)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
교과서의 고려시대 사회사 쟁점 연구
역사교육
2017 .09
-
Natural Aristocracy, Instrumentalism, Equality and Excellence
Journal of Confucian Philosophy and Culture
2022 .02
-
A Moderate, A-metaphysical, and Hierarchical Proposal to Save Liberal Orders—Response to Critics
Journal of Confucian Philosophy and Culture
2022 .02
-
고려시대 환자들의 질병 대응양상과 동아시아의학의 대중화
사림
2022 .07
-
음자손(蔭子孫)에서 귀종(貴種)으로 ― 일본 고대 지배층 신분 명칭의 변화 ―
동서인문
2023 .08
-
고려 전기 軍功者포상의 절차와 내용
사학연구
2015 .09
-
고려시대 일본과의 의료 교류와 그 성격 - ‘동아시아의료’의 한 사례 -
의사학
2023 .04
-
왜 고려전기의 國制는 황제국 체제로 보일까? - 후대 감각과 지식의 소급 적용으로 탄생한 고려전기 황제국 체제 -
역사학보
2021 .06
-
서평: 매끈한 서사에 요철을 집어넣으려면 Hyung-A Kim, Korean Skilled Workers: Toward a Labor Aristocracy. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2020. 232 pp.
한국과학사학회지
2022 .04
-
고려 국왕의 소통과 제도화
역사와실학
2018 .04
-
고려 서류부가혼 사회의 여성상과 부덕
여성과역사
2015 .01
-
고려시대 ‘교과서 서사’의 해체적 읽기와 역사적 사고 과정의 구현
역사교육
2017 .09
-
From a Lord to a Bureaucrat : The Change of Koryŏ King’s Status in the Korea-China Relations
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2016 .12
-
韩中两国中学教师聘用过程对比研究
중국학
2015 .01
-
고려의 對蒙 대응 논리와 ‘大國이미지’ : 1231, 1232년 외교문서를 중심으로
한국사학보
2015 .11
-
고려 중기 북송 신유학 전래 再論― 『宋史・楊時列傳』의 “(高麗)國主問龜山安在” 記事 분석
대동문화연구
2019 .01
-
17~18세기 두르부드의 盛衰와 중앙아시아초원의 통치체제 변동
역사학보
2021 .06
-
末松保和敎授의 高麗時代史硏究와 그 成果
한국사연구
2015 .06
-
고려전기 宣麻儀의 구성과 의례 검토
史叢(사총)
2019 .01
-
13~15세기 천하질서하에서 고려와 조선의 국가 정체성
역사비평
2017 .11
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0