지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study explores an argument between Wu, Rulun(1840~1903) and Zhang, Yuzhao(1823~1894). It is mainly about the “Three Rivers” issue in “Shang Shu·Yu Gong”, which was carried out intermittently from 1887 to 1888.
This argument began with an article by Zhang Yuzhao, which was the “Contemplation on “three rivers” in Yu Gong”. In this article, he mainly pointed out that Ban, Gu was inevitably wrong in “Hanshu Dilizhi”, and then advocated that there is another Nanjiang River other than the Beijiang River and the Zhongjiang River associated with the Yangtze River. This is simply an unprecedented insight, because the Sanjiang theory has always referred to three parts of the Yangtze River or three Rivers diverted from the Yangtze River.
As far as the theoretical structure is concerned, Zhang, Yuzhao is mainly based on Guo, Pu’s Sanjiang theory: Lijiang, Songjiang, and Zhejiang, which led to the new proposition that Nanjiang is a river. Wu, Rulun verified it in all aspects, and Zhang, Yuzhao refuted it. In the debate, they involve a wide range of academics, sometimes classics, sometimes texts, lexicons, geography, and so on. This shows that they are also well-versed in many academic fields.
At the same time, it is commendable that they strive to put the above academic methods and attitudes into education. The “Contemplation on “three rivers” in Yu Gong” mentioned at the beginning is written for the purpose of education.
By examining the beginning and end of the debate, although it is impossible to determine who wins or loses, it is estimated that Zhang, Yuzhao’s claim cannot be successfully recognized by Wu, Rulun. However, regardless of the outcome, this controversy makes sense, that is, they absorb new knowledge at the end of the 19th century and boldly challenge academic stereotypes, which are valuable in themselves, especially their profound knowledge of geography. In fact, this is the main background that touches the debate.
This argument began with an article by Zhang Yuzhao, which was the “Contemplation on “three rivers” in Yu Gong”. In this article, he mainly pointed out that Ban, Gu was inevitably wrong in “Hanshu Dilizhi”, and then advocated that there is another Nanjiang River other than the Beijiang River and the Zhongjiang River associated with the Yangtze River. This is simply an unprecedented insight, because the Sanjiang theory has always referred to three parts of the Yangtze River or three Rivers diverted from the Yangtze River.
As far as the theoretical structure is concerned, Zhang, Yuzhao is mainly based on Guo, Pu’s Sanjiang theory: Lijiang, Songjiang, and Zhejiang, which led to the new proposition that Nanjiang is a river. Wu, Rulun verified it in all aspects, and Zhang, Yuzhao refuted it. In the debate, they involve a wide range of academics, sometimes classics, sometimes texts, lexicons, geography, and so on. This shows that they are also well-versed in many academic fields.
At the same time, it is commendable that they strive to put the above academic methods and attitudes into education. The “Contemplation on “three rivers” in Yu Gong” mentioned at the beginning is written for the purpose of education.
By examining the beginning and end of the debate, although it is impossible to determine who wins or loses, it is estimated that Zhang, Yuzhao’s claim cannot be successfully recognized by Wu, Rulun. However, regardless of the outcome, this controversy makes sense, that is, they absorb new knowledge at the end of the 19th century and boldly challenge academic stereotypes, which are valuable in themselves, especially their profound knowledge of geography. In fact, this is the main background that touches the debate.
목차
1. 서론
2. 논쟁의 내용과 그 지형
3. 지리적 형세의 고찰
4. 논쟁이 놓인 자리
5. 논쟁 그 이후
參考文獻
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
重新考察姚鼐的志向 : 对“桐城文派”的再评价
한국중어중문학 우수논문집
2018 .11
-
李葆光与北方桐城派
中國散文硏究集刊
2024 .06
-
论桐城派的终局
中國散文硏究集刊
2017 .01
-
姚?의 고민 톺아보기－‘桐城文派’에 대한 검토－
중국어문학
2017 .08
-
正宗正派与变风变雅 ――桐城古文与孔孟之道
中國散文硏究集刊
2017 .01
-
韓日両言語における英語動詞の借用に関する対照研究 : 使用頻度と意味拡張の観点から
일본문화연구
2016 .01
-
台湾の世界遺産候補地をテーマにした日本語学習者の語彙拡張
한국일본어학회 학술발표회
2024 .09
-
통각(痛覚) 오노마토피어에 관한 일·한 대조연구
일본어학연구
2021 .12
-
북방, 감상적 동일시와 지적 빈곤 사이의 거리 - 松花江(松阿里江)을 중심으로 -
고전과 해석
2015 .01
-
한강수계 신석기시대 수혈주거지 연구
문물연구
2016 .01
-
后期桐城派的“三江”论争 - 以吴汝纶、张裕钊为中心
한국중어중문학 우수논문집
2020 .11
-
신라의 北進과 서북 경계의 변화
한국사연구
2016 .06
-
全羅左水營의 水塲과 鯈魚의 意味
지방사와 지방문화
2020 .05
-
『을병조천록(乙丙朝天錄)』의 허균(許筠) 독후시(讀後詩)에 대하여
연민학지
2023 .02
-
강(江) 외 1편
문학들
2020 .11
-
8월의 江
숙명문학
2019 .11
-
臨津江ㆍ漢灘江流域 古代 關防體系와 河川路
지방사와 지방문화
2022 .11
-
일본 수출규제조치에 대한 한일 갈등요인과 대응방안 고찰
재외한인연구
2021 .06
-
역사과 2022 개정 교육과정을 둘러싼 논란을 바라보며
역사와현실
2022 .09
-
The Controversy on the Extent of the Atonement in the Latter Half of the 16th Century
Hapshin Theological Review
2018 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2019-910-000474728