메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
서울대학교 인문학연구원 인문논총 인문논총 제73권 제4호
발행연도
2016.1
수록면
15 - 58 (44page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In postcolonial discussions, the evolutionary theory has been one of the most controversial issues, as its application to human society has been used as a justification for imperialism/colonialism. In this essay, I address this issue, drawing upon the Marx section of Gayatri Spivak’s A Critique of Postcolonial Reason, in which she critiques Marx’s foreclosure of his own concept of the Asiatic Mode of Production [AMP]. Rather than focusing on the native informant’s perspective and related topics, I pay particular attention to Spivak’s new emphasis on the foreclosure of the AMP in this section and her issues with Marx’s acceptance of evolutionary models, based on the assumption that Spivak considers Marx’s foreclosure an expression of his “desire to theorize the other,” which is based on the idea of unilinear “evolutionary storyline.” I also analyze how Spivak “resurrects” the AMP “in order to understand globality” (CPR 72), without problematizing the supposition about “stages” of development as long as such development doesn’t rely on the idea of unilinearity, and with the aim of indicating how Marx’s AMP has given insights to contemporary philosophers such as Deleuze and Guattari, who connect the AMP to the contemporary globalized world. All in all, I seek to make my point that Spivak marks herself as one of the remarkable postcolonial theorists to incorporate Derridean “new politics of reading” in her new reading of Marxian evolutionary models, thus enriching postcolonial theories.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (42)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0