메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류
인문학
인문학 일반 역사학 철학 종교학 어문학 기타 인문학
사회과학
사회과학 일반 경영학 관광학 교육학 군사학 문헌정보학 법학 사회학 신문방송학 심리과학 정치외교학 지리학 행정학 경제학 무역학 인류학 기타 사회과학
자연과학
자연과학 일반 물리학 생물학 생활과학 수학·통계학 천문학 지구과학 화학 기타 자연과학
공학
공학 일반 건축공학 기계공학 산업공학 재료·에너지공학 전기전자공학 조선해양공학 화학공학 컴퓨터학 기타공학
의약학
의학 일반 간호학 수의학 약학 한의학 기초의학 임상의학 기타 의약학
농수해양학
농수해양학 일반 농학 수산학 식품과학 임학 축산학 해상운송학 기타 농수해양학
예술체육학
예술 일반 디자인 미술 미용 사진 음악학 의상 체육 공연매체예술 기타 예술체육학
복합학
학제간연구 과학기술학 뇌인지과학 기술정책 기타 복합학

ENG

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국외국어대학교 법학연구소 외법논집 외법논집 제33권 제4호
발행연도
2009
수록면
391 - 418 (28page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Constitutional Court of Korea considered that Night outdoor assembly regulations, clause 10, the law on assembly and demonstration and ‘outdoor assembly in the text of clause 10’, article 1, clause 10, of the foresaid Law were unconstitutional since they breached the prohibition regulation to prohibition of permit system, article 21, clause 2 of the constitutional law, therefore, made a decision of disagreement to the constitutional law on September 24, 2009. First, the viewpoint of Constitutional Court of Korea that clause 10 and number 1, clause 23 in the law on assembly and demonstration breached the prohibition regulation to prohibition of permit system in article 2, clause 21 of the constitutional law is valid. That is, it is defined that "…the Head of the police station may permit outdoor assembly before sunrise or after sunset with the condition to maintain order.", the proviso in clause 10 in the law on assembly and demonstration but the Head of the police station makes night outdoor assembly not opened at discretion due to the regulation of "…the Head of the police station… may permit.", even if the promoter of assembly reported with the condition defined in the law on assembly and demonstration arranging order maintenance people in advance. Hence, clause 10 and number 1, clause 23 in the law on assembly and demonstration breached the prohibition regulation to prohibition of permit system, article 2, clause 21, the constitutional law and they were unconstitutional. However, if Constitutional Court of Korea declares only that clause 10 and number 1, clause 23 in the law on assembly and demonstration breached article 2, clause 21 of the constitutional law, it is not valid since the problem below occurs. That is, if National Assembly cancelled the proviso in clause 10 in the law on assembly and demonstration in the future, the permission of assembly cannot be decided at discretion of the Head of the police station so it does not breach the regulation of the prohibition regulation to prohibition of permit system, article 2, clause 21, the constitutional law. However, night outdoor assembly is prohibited generally and totally by the text in clause 10 in the law on assembly and demonstration only by abstract judgment that night outdoor assembly would be detrimental to public peace and order by being violated easily that day outdoor assembly, which cannot be proved, is neither valid in the purpose of legislation, reflecting it on the principle of proportion, nor appropriate to the means. The interception of danger to damage public order or the benefit and protection of the law for other people due to the opening of night outdoor assembly should be made not by the means of the prohibition of night outdoor assembly, in principle, by clause 10 in the law on assembly and demonstration but by clause 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 20 in the law on assembly and demonstration. And, assembly is prohibited in extensive time such as ‘before sunrise and after sunset’, not prohibiting assembly after eleven o’clock at night in France or Russia, so it breaches the principle of minimum infringement. In addition, private benefit, infringed by being incapacitated of freedom of assembly, would be larger than public peace and order acquired by the prohibition of outdoor assembly at night by clause 10 in the law on assembly and demonstration. Therefore, it would be desirable that Constitutional Court declared that the text in clause 10 in the law on assembly and demonstration breached article 2, clause 37 of constitutional law as well as breaching article 2, clause 21 of constitutional law in this decision. Furthermore, it would be desirable that Constitutional Court declared simple unconstitutionality to clause 10 and number 1, clause 23 in the law on assembly and demonstration than decision of disagreement to constitutional law and abrogated the foresaid regulations in the law on assembly and demonstration to secure freedom of assembly as much as possible.
#집회의 자유 #집회 및 시위에 관한 법률상 야간옥외집회금지 규정 #집회 및 시위에 관한 법률상 처벌 규정 #허가제 금지 #비례의 원칙 #Freedom of assembly #Night Outdoor Assembly Regulations in the Law on Assembly and Demonstration #Penalty Regulations in the Law on Assembly and Demonstration #Prohibition of permit system #Principle of balancing test

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (20)

참고문헌 신청
/ / http://www.asiae.co.kr/news/view.htm?idxno=2009102916324778371 / / http://www.vop.co.kr/A00000271447.html 권두섭 / 2003 / 집시법과 경찰당국의 자의적 법집행으로 인한 침해 사례, In: 집회와 시위의 자유 / 사람생각 google schola 김도형 / 2003 / 현행집시법의 운영실태상의 문제점과 법 개정방향, In: 집회와 시위의 자유 / 사람생각 google schola 김승환 / 2001 / 집회와 시위의 자유의 헌법적 의미 / 집시법 개정안 마련을 위한 공청회 자료집 google schola

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0