메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국중국소설학회 중국소설논총 중국소설논총 제29호
발행연도
2009.1
수록면
183 - 207 (25page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper is intended to show how characters of text, author, reader, and the method of reading were changed by the prominent spread of printing culture in China after 16 century, through analyzing the differences between Zhuxi(朱熹)'s canon reading in 12c and Jin-Shengtan(金聖嘆)'s novel reading in 17c. Chinese canon, as the words of the sage had been regarded as sacred and principal texts to readers. So readers were forced to accept the fixed and unified meaning from canon and special commentators played an important role in this field. Zhuxi offered oral and intensive reading method to the readers. These situations reflected the beginning stage of printing culture, or pre-printing culture. On the other hand, printing culture was prominently diffused after 16 century. Chinese vernacular novels were supplied like a great flood. Characters of text, author, reader, and the method of reading were changed on this unprecedented condition. We can find that the method of novel reading was changed gradually during several centuries, from oral reading to silent and private reading. Authority of novel' author could not be found, because most of them hided as an anonym. So novel reader could have the right to interpret the text variously according to their will and desire. I think that literary field surrounding Chinese vernacular novel after 16 century was based on relatively more personalized society, in comparison with the previous era. I also think that this conditions which was changed in 16-17c showed a transitional stage toward modern Chinese literature. I wish that my discussion is able to help to deepen a bit superficial analysis which has been discussed until now.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (34)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0