지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 연구보고서
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2019.8
- 수록면
- 1 - 147 (147page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
As living conditions and culture of citizens are important for circulation of resources, it is necessary to lay foundation for and promote citizen participation as well as resource circulation village and resource circulatory culture programs. In Korea, “Framework Act on Resource Circulation” became effective in January 2018 in which the 8th clause on creation of culture for development of resource circulatory society calls for “establishment and implementation of necessary policies for disseminating and stabilizing resource circulatory culture in overall society.”
While Gyeonggi-Do has enacted “ Gyeonggi-Do Basic Ordinance on Resource Circulation,” “ Gyeonggi-Do Ordinance on Establishment and Operation of Upcycle Plaza,” and “ Gyeonggi-Do Ordinance on Support for Reducing the Use of Disposable Items” in relation to the resource circulatory culture program and has established legal basis for various educational and marketing programs in those ordinances, specific plans and supporting systems are still needed.
This research study proposes various plans for vitalization of resource circulatory culture programs by analyzing the conditions for promoting the program and the status of citizens in order to vitalize resource circulatory culture in Gyeonggi-Do.
First, as over 94% of Gyeonggi-Do citizens recognize the need for cultural programs related to resource circulation, it is necessary to promote Gyeonggi-Do Resource Circulatory Cultural Program and develop and structure specific businesses such as monitoring of waste treatment facility as well as waste separation and growth of resource circulation business.
Second, given that 75% of Gyeonggi-Do citizens recognize the need for community organizations for resource circulation with 76% of them willing to participate, it is necessary to form community organizations around NGO and local groups related to resource circulation and promote regular advertisements and education related to the reduction, emission and recirculation of waste products.
Third, it is necessary to operate educational program related to resource circulation and vitalize resource circulation platform. 61% of Gyeonggi-Do citizens indicate lack of education on resource circulation, 57% of them are willing to participate in resource circulatory program and 80% of them agree with the need for waste information and platform through online and mobile channels. Therefore, it is necessary to operate various educational programs such as those on methods for recycling and reuse, one-day class on resource circulation (upcycling) and DIY classes at apartment centers, community centers and specialized local government facilities (e.g., upcycling plaza) and establish promotional system.
Fourth, as 77% of Gyeonggi-Do citizens recognize the lack of information on resource circulation and over 48% of them indicate that they need information on waste separation and emission, it is necessary to structure network among waste treatment facilities for informational purpose in order to provide information on waste circulatory culture program and disclose and share information through resource circulation map, SNS and chatbots.
Fifth, it is necessary to secure funding for and establish support system for the resource circulatory culture program. In particular, it is necessary to refine and diversify the cultural program at Gyeonggi Upcycle Plaza and Gyeonggi Resource Circulation Village Program. Also, it is necessary to specialize institutional support system such as the utilization of “waste disposition fee” in order to secure funding for the resource circulatory culture program.
While Gyeonggi-Do has enacted “ Gyeonggi-Do Basic Ordinance on Resource Circulation,” “ Gyeonggi-Do Ordinance on Establishment and Operation of Upcycle Plaza,” and “ Gyeonggi-Do Ordinance on Support for Reducing the Use of Disposable Items” in relation to the resource circulatory culture program and has established legal basis for various educational and marketing programs in those ordinances, specific plans and supporting systems are still needed.
This research study proposes various plans for vitalization of resource circulatory culture programs by analyzing the conditions for promoting the program and the status of citizens in order to vitalize resource circulatory culture in Gyeonggi-Do.
First, as over 94% of Gyeonggi-Do citizens recognize the need for cultural programs related to resource circulation, it is necessary to promote Gyeonggi-Do Resource Circulatory Cultural Program and develop and structure specific businesses such as monitoring of waste treatment facility as well as waste separation and growth of resource circulation business.
Second, given that 75% of Gyeonggi-Do citizens recognize the need for community organizations for resource circulation with 76% of them willing to participate, it is necessary to form community organizations around NGO and local groups related to resource circulation and promote regular advertisements and education related to the reduction, emission and recirculation of waste products.
Third, it is necessary to operate educational program related to resource circulation and vitalize resource circulation platform. 61% of Gyeonggi-Do citizens indicate lack of education on resource circulation, 57% of them are willing to participate in resource circulatory program and 80% of them agree with the need for waste information and platform through online and mobile channels. Therefore, it is necessary to operate various educational programs such as those on methods for recycling and reuse, one-day class on resource circulation (upcycling) and DIY classes at apartment centers, community centers and specialized local government facilities (e.g., upcycling plaza) and establish promotional system.
Fourth, as 77% of Gyeonggi-Do citizens recognize the lack of information on resource circulation and over 48% of them indicate that they need information on waste separation and emission, it is necessary to structure network among waste treatment facilities for informational purpose in order to provide information on waste circulatory culture program and disclose and share information through resource circulation map, SNS and chatbots.
Fifth, it is necessary to secure funding for and establish support system for the resource circulatory culture program. In particular, it is necessary to refine and diversify the cultural program at Gyeonggi Upcycle Plaza and Gyeonggi Resource Circulation Village Program. Also, it is necessary to specialize institutional support system such as the utilization of “waste disposition fee” in order to secure funding for the resource circulatory culture program.
목차
[표지]
[정책건의]
[차례]
표차례
그림차례
[제1장 서론]
1. 연구배경 및 목적
2. 연구범위 및 방법
[제2장 자원순환문화의 정의 및 법·제도]
1. 자원순환문화의 정의
2. 자원순환 관련 법·제도
3. 국내·외 사례
[제3장 경기도 자원순환문화 조성사업 여건분석]
1. 경기도 자원순환문화 조성사업 현황
2. 경기도 자원순환문화 조성사업 여건 분석
3. 설문조사 분석
[제4장 경기도 자원순환문화 조성사업 추진 방안]
1. 자원순환문화 조성사업 여건전망 및 추진전략
2. 자원순환문화 조성사업 추진체계
3. 자원순환문화 조성사업 지원제도
[제5장 결론 및 정책제언]
[참고문헌]
[Abstract]
[부록]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
자원순환기본법의 제정 의미와 폐기물법제의 향후 과제 - 폐기물과 순환자원의 관계를 중심으로 -
경희법학
2016 .01
-
초등학생의 순환계 학습을 위한 탐색적 모형 활용 탐구 활동의 개발
생물교육
2023 .06
-
초등학생용 자원순환교육 교재의 개발 및 적용
한국초등교육
2019 .01
-
디지털 플랫폼을 이용한 자원순환 산업 활성화 방안
한국환경정책학회 학술대회논문집
2023 .02
-
TPACK 기반 테크놀로지 활용 STEAM 프로그램 개발 및 적용 효과- 순환 기관을 중심으로 -
초등과학교육
2020 .01
-
디지털 플랫폼 정부와 자원순환 정책의 미래
한국환경정책학회 학술대회논문집
2023 .02
-
4차 산업혁명대학 유치방안 연구
정책연구
2022 .12
-
경기도-대학 간 효율적 연계 협력을 위한 연구
정책연구
2015 .12
-
경기도 공공건축물 친환경기술 도입 적용 방안
정책연구
2018 .12
-
도농순환을 통한 지역내생적 발전에 관한 연구
지역사회연구
2017 .12
-
경기창작센터 활성화 방안
정책연구
2020 .11
-
경기도와 비경기도 제조업의 총요소생산성과 구성요인의 변화 비교
GRI 연구논총
2016 .04
-
경기도형 노동회의소 설립 방향에 대한 연구
정책연구
2018 .12
-
중국 ‘포스트’ 개혁·개방 정책의 이론적 기초: ‘경제내순환론’을 중심으로
국제지역연구
2021 .01
-
경기도 에너지센터의 발전방안
정책연구
2018 .03
-
지역사회 복지정책의 중요도와 만족도에 관한 실증분석 : 경기도를 중심으로
한국정책연구
2023 .09
-
경기도 사회적경제지원센터 설치 방안 연구
정책연구
2019 .09
-
Boy Power: Soft Power and Political Power in the Circulation of Boys Love (BL) Narratives from South Korea, Thailand, and the Philippines
SUVANNABHUMI
2024 .01
-
경기도 생활계 유해폐기물 관리방안
정책연구
2020 .09
-
우리나라 자원순환 정책수단 유형의 특징 및 변화:“제1차 자원순환기본계획(2011-2015)”과“제1차 자원순환기본계획(2018-2027)” 비교를 중심으로
국가정책연구
2023 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2019-309-001235504