지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2019.11
- 수록면
- 51 - 65 (15page)
- DOI
- 10.35227/HYLR.2019.11.30.4.51
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The nation has repeatedly revised the current Refugee Act, enacted on February 10, 2012, implemented on July 1, 2013, and has sought to find social and national issues for refugees that have been discussed or discussed so far, as well as improvement in social realities and norms on some refugee laws. First of all, the Enforcement Decree of the Act was enacted on June 12, 2013 (July 1, 2013) and the Enforcement Rules of the same Act (the Act was enacted on June 28, 2013 (July 1, 2013). In general, the Immigration Act consists of the Basic Act on Korean and Foreign Affairs, the Employment of Foreign Workers Act, the Multicultural Family Support Act, the Marriage Arbitration Act, the Refugee Act, the Immigration Control Act and the Nationality Act. Among these immigration laws, it is the Refugee Act that has recently been legislated and enforced.
The nation has so far seen a rise in the influx of immigrants of various types, including foreign workers, students studying abroad and marriage visas. Similarly, there were not so many applicants for refugees before 1994, and until 2010, there were not many applicants for refugee status, nor were there many administrative or administrative resources required for such work. The pattern has changed since 2010, when their numbers have been on the rise considerably, especially since 2015. Furthermore, the number of applicants has increased to such a degree that the number of professional administrators who examine refugee applications is far short. However, the public is concerned about the possibility that even serious risk factors in the nation"s stability and social order could be latent. As such, the nation should strive to secure national security and maintain social order by improving the legal policy or system on some problematic refugees, and gain public trust through efficient national refugee policies.
It is also a normative reality that it has to be followed either on the domestic and international legal systems for applicants for refugees or on a humanitarian level. Under the constitutional value order, the nation should seek a harmonized legal and criminal alternative to international laws, such as the Refugee Convention, or Korea"s current refugee law. Considering the foreign policy and refugee policies by international politics and economy, the government should improve and supplement the lack of refugee law in accordance with domestic political and economic situations. In this regard, this research paper looked at the social perception and problems of refugees, and looked at them from a practical perspective and the social realities of refugee law. In addition, even with regard to the provisions of the current ban on forced repatriation under the Refugee Act, there is a need for forced repatriation out of the country for maintaining public order and ensuring national security pursuant to Article 33 paragraph 2 of the Refugee Convention, and there is a need to clarify the scope of the reason for repatriation. After all, the nation and society will have to pursue refugee policies, seeking ways to resolve social problems and normative values for refugees in harmony.
The nation has so far seen a rise in the influx of immigrants of various types, including foreign workers, students studying abroad and marriage visas. Similarly, there were not so many applicants for refugees before 1994, and until 2010, there were not many applicants for refugee status, nor were there many administrative or administrative resources required for such work. The pattern has changed since 2010, when their numbers have been on the rise considerably, especially since 2015. Furthermore, the number of applicants has increased to such a degree that the number of professional administrators who examine refugee applications is far short. However, the public is concerned about the possibility that even serious risk factors in the nation"s stability and social order could be latent. As such, the nation should strive to secure national security and maintain social order by improving the legal policy or system on some problematic refugees, and gain public trust through efficient national refugee policies.
It is also a normative reality that it has to be followed either on the domestic and international legal systems for applicants for refugees or on a humanitarian level. Under the constitutional value order, the nation should seek a harmonized legal and criminal alternative to international laws, such as the Refugee Convention, or Korea"s current refugee law. Considering the foreign policy and refugee policies by international politics and economy, the government should improve and supplement the lack of refugee law in accordance with domestic political and economic situations. In this regard, this research paper looked at the social perception and problems of refugees, and looked at them from a practical perspective and the social realities of refugee law. In addition, even with regard to the provisions of the current ban on forced repatriation under the Refugee Act, there is a need for forced repatriation out of the country for maintaining public order and ensuring national security pursuant to Article 33 paragraph 2 of the Refugee Convention, and there is a need to clarify the scope of the reason for repatriation. After all, the nation and society will have to pursue refugee policies, seeking ways to resolve social problems and normative values for refugees in harmony.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 한국사회의 난민
Ⅲ. 난민법과 난민협약의 강제송환금지
Ⅳ. 강제송환금지의 적용범위의 일고찰
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (12)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
한국과 세계 난민 실태와 현황 비교연구
다문화사회와 교육연구
2019 .01
-
난민법상 난민심사의 효율성 방안
한양법학
2023 .11
-
Korea's Practice on Refugee Protection: Focusing on the Refugee Act and Relevant Court Cases
Pacific Focus
2024 .04
-
난민문제에 관한 서론적 고찰 - 난민 수용의 필요성과 당위성을 중심으로 -
한양법학
2019 .05
-
인권 보호 차원에서 본 우리나라 난민법
법과인권교육연구
2016 .01
-
An Exploratory Study on the Adjustment Experiences of Refugees Living in South Korea: Focusing on a positive perspective
비교교육연구
2023 .05
-
The Korea-Thailand Cooperation on the Refugee Issues
한국태국학회논총
2022 .02
-
난민불인정자의 불복절차에 관한 연구
다문화사회연구
2019 .10
-
Conceptualizing Education within a Thai Refugee Camp Based on a ‘for Them’ and a ‘by Them’ Paradigm
아시아리뷰
2022 .12
-
Labor Market Integration as a Solution for Refugee Crisis in Indonesia: Lesson learned from EU member cases and the implications for Indonesia
EU연구
2020 .01
-
난민법 개정방향과 강제송환금지원칙
법과 정책연구
2019 .01
-
A Governance Framework for Syrian Refugees in Italy: Social Integration and Cultural Assimilation
Mediterranean review
2019 .01
-
난민의 인권 및 두려움의 쟁점
경찰학논총
2020 .01
-
난민 인권 보호를 위한 난민법 개정 방향 연구 - 난민 심사 및 난민 처우를 중심으로 -
법조
2018 .01
-
카렌족 재정착 난민의 이동과 적응 경험에 관한 연구
디아스포라연구
2019 .06
-
난민, 뿌리 내리지 못한 사람과 인권, 문화 갈등: 표명희,『어느 날 난민』(2018)
민주주의와 인권
2023 .06
-
독일의 난민사태에 대한 대응입법의 연구
법과정책
2017 .01
-
국내 신문 기사로 살펴본 한국의 난민 이슈의 변동
대한지리학회지
2021 .04
-
1951년 난민의 지위에 관한 협약의 현대적 재조명 : 협약 외 난민 보호를 중심으로
인도법논총
2018 .12
-
신문기사의 난민 키워드 변화 경향 연구 -‘빅카인즈’ 신문기사 제목 활용-
다문화사회와 교육연구
2019 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2020-360-000116517