메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국공법학회 공법연구 공법연구 제32집 제3호
발행연도
2004.2
수록면
163 - 178 (16page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Treaty is a kind of international law rather than a national law. However, many countries in the world give a treaty a force as a legal norm in their territories. Article 6 Section 1 of Korean Constitution treats treaty like a national law by providing "Treaties duly concluded and promulgated under the Constitution and the generally recognized rule of international law have the same effect as the domestic laws of the Republic of Korea." In addition, for the treaty to be treated like a national law, it should acquire the consent !Tom National Assembly based on Article 60 Section 1 of Korean Constitution which prescribes "The National Assembly has the right to consent to the conclusion and ratification of treaties pertaining to mutual assistance or mutual security; treaties concerning important international organizations; treaties of friendship, trade and navigation; treaties pertaining to any restriction in sovereignty; peace treaties; treaties which will burden the Slate or people with an important financial obligation; and treaties related to legislative matters."Then, do the treaties that are not enumerated in Article 60 Section 1 of Korean Constitution need not to have consent from National Assembly? If so, do those kinds of treaties still have a force as national laws as Article 6 Section 1 of Korean Constitution provides? The consent from National Assembly means democratic control from Korean people because the Congressmen are selected and, therefore, represent Korean people. I believe that the treaties that are not enumerated in Article 60 Section 1 of Korean Constitution and didn't get the consent from National Assembly should be treated not as national laws but as administrative orders which are positioned lower than the law in the hierarchy of legal norms. Generally speaking, the treaties in the same rank with administrative orders should undergo the judicial review by Korean courts according to Article 107 Section 2 of Korean Constitution. And only the treaties with the consent of National Assembly should have a force as national laws and undergo the judicial review by Korean Constitutional Court. I will examine the decisions by courts including Korean Constitutional Court as weil as real-world practices by Korean governments to analyze whether these criteria are steadily followed by them.

목차

AbstractⅠ. 문제의 제기Ⅱ. 대한민국 헌법 제6조 1항과 국제법질서의 존중Ⅲ. 대한민국 헌법 제60조 1항과 국회의 동의를 요하는 조약Ⅳ. 문제점과 해결방안Ⅴ. 결론 : 앞으로의 전망《참고문헌》

참고문헌 (8)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2020-350-000706291