지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- The Academy of Korean Studies THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES Vol.7 No.3 SEPTEMBER 2004
- 발행연도
- 2004.9
- 수록면
- 65 - 89 (25page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
During the Second World War, the people of Joseon lived under the control of Japanese Fascism which permeated into the web of everyday life. The Joseon people were legally regarded as “the second nation” or “half nation” of Japan and some cooperated with their war effort in the hope of possible Japanese triumph. Though many prospected the defeat of Japan, most of the Joseon people kept silent and passively adjusted themselves to Japanese rule. However, the discontent came out and most of it was related to wartime policy. There was also a certain degree of difference in this regard between the generations.
The “older generation” born before the coercive annexation did not experience the education and enlightenment of the Japanese style had a half-feudalistic mind and difficulties in transforming into the type of people required by Japanese Imperialists or “the modern type of men.” They had the tendency of trying to overcome the anxious life of wartime through superstition and religion. Under the condition of Japanese Wartime Fascism that sanctioned the Emperor system only, their behavior was interpreted as resistance against war.
On the other hand, the “younger generation” born after the annexation experienced Japanese institutional education and were different from the “older generation.” They experienced the process of colonialist capitalization, individualism, meritocracy, and rationalism, which were all embedded in their minds. Also, they fell into a “chauvinistic nationalism” as the effect of colonial policy and distorted modern consciousness and false political consciousness concerning the rights and responsibilities of “the nation” were formed. Their awareness of potential Japanese defeat in the Second World War encouraged them toward direct political practice in expectation of the liberation of Joseon and the building of a new nation. In addition, it provided the foundation of the younger generation’s selective participation in the nation building process of the north and south that developed under the conflict between the left and the right after liberation.
The “older generation” born before the coercive annexation did not experience the education and enlightenment of the Japanese style had a half-feudalistic mind and difficulties in transforming into the type of people required by Japanese Imperialists or “the modern type of men.” They had the tendency of trying to overcome the anxious life of wartime through superstition and religion. Under the condition of Japanese Wartime Fascism that sanctioned the Emperor system only, their behavior was interpreted as resistance against war.
On the other hand, the “younger generation” born after the annexation experienced Japanese institutional education and were different from the “older generation.” They experienced the process of colonialist capitalization, individualism, meritocracy, and rationalism, which were all embedded in their minds. Also, they fell into a “chauvinistic nationalism” as the effect of colonial policy and distorted modern consciousness and false political consciousness concerning the rights and responsibilities of “the nation” were formed. Their awareness of potential Japanese defeat in the Second World War encouraged them toward direct political practice in expectation of the liberation of Joseon and the building of a new nation. In addition, it provided the foundation of the younger generation’s selective participation in the nation building process of the north and south that developed under the conflict between the left and the right after liberation.
목차
Preface
Generational Differences in Surrounding Conditions Concerning the Public’s Own Formation of their Perceptions toward the War
Each Generation’s Perception of War and Their Will to Resist
Concluding Remarks
References
참고문헌 (17)
참고문헌 신청
, 1939c , “Interrogations in Impoliteness Cases
, 1941 , Documents Related to Joseon Criminal Policies
, 1942 , Documents related to Joseon Criminal Policies
, 1995 , “Cheongnyeoncheungui insikgwa hwaldong--dongnip mit gukgageonseol junbi munjereul jungsimeuro”
, 1996 , Iljemal jeonsipasho chejeha haksaeng minjokundongui jeongaewa minjokjuuijeok seonggyeok:(The Students’ National Movement under the Wartime Fascist Regime of the Japanese Occupation Period, and the Nationalist Qualities of Their Actions) 67
, 1941 , Documents Related to Joseon Criminal Policies
, 1942 , Documents related to Joseon Criminal Policies
, 1995 , “Cheongnyeoncheungui insikgwa hwaldong--dongnip mit gukgageonseol junbi munjereul jungsimeuro”
, 1996 , Iljemal jeonsipasho chejeha haksaeng minjokundongui jeongaewa minjokjuuijeok seonggyeok:(The Students’ National Movement under the Wartime Fascist Regime of the Japanese Occupation Period, and the Nationalist Qualities of Their Actions) 67
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
[기획: 한국사상 전쟁기억과 기억전쟁] 2차대전기 조선민중의 세대별 전쟁인식 비교
역사와현실
2004 .03
-
일제 강제병합 이데올로기와 식민지교육정책
한국독립운동사연구
2011 .08
-
해방기 소설의 민족주의 과잉 양상 고찰 : 일본인 소재의 소설을 중심으로
어문학
2014 .03
-
조선총독부 고적조사사업에 대한 평가와 인식 -패전 후 일본 학계의 동향을 중심으로-
한일관계사연구
2020 .05
-
‘한국 강제병합’ 100년 일본역사학의 동향과 전망
한국사학보
2011 .02
-
日本語 対外 普及論理의 考察 : 日帝下 韓에 대한 경우를 中心으로
일본문화학보
2002 .02
-
Japanese Studies in Korea
Korea Journal
1965 .06
-
The Educational World of Joseon People Living in Manchuria during Japanese Imperialism
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2009 .03
-
1920년대 전반 조선총독부의 선전영화 제작과 상영
지방사와 지방문화
2006 .11
-
The Three Generations
Korea Journal
1978 .02
-
日清、日露戦争期における日本キリスト教とその朝鮮認識に関する研究
일본문화연구
2014 .10
-
‘한국병합’에 대한 재한일본 언론의 동향 : 잡지 『朝鮮』을 중심으로
동북아역사논총
2010 .12
-
파시즘과 리리시즘의 상관성 연구 : 일제 말기 서정시의 경우
한국시학연구
2009 .12
-
韓国大学生が関心を持つ日本の「文化」
日本語敎育
2019 .01
-
『季刊三千里』·『季刊青丘』に関する一考察 : 在日社会のコミュニケテイ形成について
일어일문학
2013 .05
-
韓日兩國의 歷史認識問題
사학연구
2003 .12
-
근대 일본의 전사자 위령에 대한 연구사적 접근 : 전후 일본학계의 연구를 중심으로
비교문화연구
2011 .07
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2020-911-000954949