메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
중동아프리카연구소 아랍과 이슬람 세계 아랍과 이슬람 세계 제3집
발행연도
2016.10
수록면
148 - 187 (40page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Two major approaches have been utilized for the study of religions: comparative studies of religions and biblical-theological studies of religions. These two approaches have merits and usefulness for its own unique purposes, but one must not be confused to mix the two for the evangelistic efforts of Christian missions. In specific, one must take note of the subtle dangers and pitfalls from misusing comparative approaches to other religions in missiological studies.
Recently new methods or approaches of Muslim evangelism have been proposed under the name of contextualization. Some of these proposals are based on the assumption that there is a significant number of positive features in Islam or many similarities between Islam and Christianity that can provide important ground for exploring better grounds for presenting the gospel to Muslims. While pursuing this line of reasoning to an extreme, some have reached a conclusion that the religion of Islam can be understood in a new perspective. Others even tried to redefine Islam in an unconventional way. One such example is found in the writings of the Insider Movement proponents.
This article identifies the unique contributions of the two major approaches of other religions, and contends that the evangelical theological studies of religions based on a sound biblical theology must be the primary ground for dealing with other religions (including Islam) for the Christian missions. It also demonstrates that how the Insider Movement proponents mixed the two approaches in their missiological thinking in their attempts to validate the Insider Movement. Their fundamental errors are proved to be faulty hermeneutical conclusions for certain biblical passages primarily because of two reasons: due to the lack of sound hermeneutical method and due to the lack of sound theology of religions based on healthy evangelical biblical theology.

목차

I. 서론
II. 비교종교학적 접근과 종교신학적 접근법의 이해
III. 두 가지 접근법의 선교학적 함의
IV. 이슬람선교에 있어서의 두 가지 접근법이 혼동되어 사용되는 사례: 내부자운동
V. 맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2021-918-000049604