지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2021.5
- 수록면
- 23 - 44 (22page)
- DOI
- 10.35227/HYLR.2021.5.32.2.23
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
A research on international judicial institutions constitutes an integral part of the study of international law. As a peaceful settlement mechanism to international disputes, the judicial settlement system contributes to the maintenance of international peace and security. Considering that the reason for the existence of international law is the maintenance of international peace and security, research concerning various aspects of international judicial institutions could be regarded as an important area with regard to the international legal research areas.
In terms of international law, research on international judicial institutions has mainly focused on the interpretation of the judgments of international judicial institutions. In other words, interpreting the meaning of international law principles and norms argued by litigants in international adjudication and clarifying the exact meaning of international law is the main interest from the field of international law on international judicial institutions.
On the other hand, international relations deals with various issues related to international judicial institutions. In other words, the scope of issues touched by international relations are very wide, from the establishment stage of international judicial institutions to the ex post evaluation of the activities of international judicial institutions. In particular, through empirical analysis, international relations presents the workable condition for international judicial institutions, provides certain conditions for litigants for the purpose of active participation in international adjudication, and suggests a relevant solution for problem linked with international judicial institutions" independency. In this regard, the approach of international relations to international judicial institutions makes a huge contribution to the development of international law.
However, by emphasizing the extra-legal aspect of international judicial institutions, the approach of international relations to international judicial institutions runs the risk of making the essential role of international judicial institutions as a court of law peripheral issue. In this context, uncritical incorporation of international relations approach to international judicial institutions might lead to negative views on the role of international judicial institutions. Thus, the insight provided by international relations analysis of international judicial institutions should be considered having limited values for the study of international judicial institutions in so far as it provides useful empirical information for the study of international judicial institutions with international legal research.
In terms of international law, research on international judicial institutions has mainly focused on the interpretation of the judgments of international judicial institutions. In other words, interpreting the meaning of international law principles and norms argued by litigants in international adjudication and clarifying the exact meaning of international law is the main interest from the field of international law on international judicial institutions.
On the other hand, international relations deals with various issues related to international judicial institutions. In other words, the scope of issues touched by international relations are very wide, from the establishment stage of international judicial institutions to the ex post evaluation of the activities of international judicial institutions. In particular, through empirical analysis, international relations presents the workable condition for international judicial institutions, provides certain conditions for litigants for the purpose of active participation in international adjudication, and suggests a relevant solution for problem linked with international judicial institutions" independency. In this regard, the approach of international relations to international judicial institutions makes a huge contribution to the development of international law.
However, by emphasizing the extra-legal aspect of international judicial institutions, the approach of international relations to international judicial institutions runs the risk of making the essential role of international judicial institutions as a court of law peripheral issue. In this context, uncritical incorporation of international relations approach to international judicial institutions might lead to negative views on the role of international judicial institutions. Thus, the insight provided by international relations analysis of international judicial institutions should be considered having limited values for the study of international judicial institutions in so far as it provides useful empirical information for the study of international judicial institutions with international legal research.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 국제사법기구에 관한 국제관계학 주요 이론의 시각
Ⅲ. 국제사법기구에 관한 국제관계학 접근의 유용성과 문제점
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (16)
참고문헌 신청
Karen Alter / 2014 / The New Terrain of International Law: Courts, Politics, Rights / Princeton Univ. Press
John Baylis / 2011 / The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations / Oxford Univ. Press
Jeffrey Dunoff / 2012 / Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The Study of the Art / Cambridge Univ. Press
Judith Goldstein / 2001 / Legalization and World Politics / MIT Press
Kenneth Abbott / 2012 / Legalization and World Politics / MIT Press :17~35
John Baylis / 2011 / The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations / Oxford Univ. Press
Jeffrey Dunoff / 2012 / Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The Study of the Art / Cambridge Univ. Press
Judith Goldstein / 2001 / Legalization and World Politics / MIT Press
Kenneth Abbott / 2012 / Legalization and World Politics / MIT Press :17~35
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
中国21世纪的民事司法改革
법학논총
2024 .06
-
교섭단위 분리 · 통합 결정에 대한 (준)사법적 통제와 한계 - ‘내용의 위법’을 이유로 한 (준)사법적 통제의 위법성 -
노동법포럼
2024 .07
-
근대 사법제도에 관한 연구 – 헌법상 재판청구권과 사법권 독립을 중심으로 –
법이론실무연구
2023 .11
-
미국의 사법접근성 보장제도
법학연구
2020 .01
-
대한민국의 사법개혁 현황과 전망
사법
2017 .01
-
특별사법경찰관리의 단말기 조회를 통한 범죄경력자료 조회 적법성에 관한 비판적 소고- 개인정보자기결정권 침해 여부를 중심으로 -
비교법연구
2024 .08
-
우리 사법시스템에 대한 새로운 고찰 : 전자소송 등의 상황에서
저스티스
2015 .02
-
선박경매에 관한 베이징협약 연구 Ⅰ - 협약의 적용범위와 경매통고를 중심으로
민사집행법연구
2023 .02
-
REFLECTIONS ON THE BASIC FUNCTIONS OF JUDICIAL BIG DATA IN CHINA —— TAKING THE ANALYSIS PROCESS OF AN INSURANCE CASE AS AN EXAMPLE
원광법학
2019 .01
-
특별사법경찰에 관한 연구(Ⅰ)
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2022 .12
-
우리 법원에서의 국제법 관련 판결
서울국제법연구
2017 .12
-
우리 법원에서의 국제법 관련 판결
서울국제법연구
2021 .06
-
우리 법원에서의 국제법 관련 판결
서울국제법연구
2020 .12
-
우리 법원에서의 국제법 관련 판결
서울국제법연구
2018 .06
-
우리 법원에서의 국제법 관련 판결
서울국제법연구
2022 .12
-
우리 법원에서의 국제법 관련 판결
서울국제법연구
2019 .12
-
우리 법원에서의 국제법 관련 판결
서울국제법연구
2019 .06
-
우리 법원에서의 국제법 관련 판결
서울국제법연구
2020 .06
-
법관인사제도 변화에 대한 신제도주의적 분석
법과사회
2016 .01
-
동아시아의 법조인 양성제도
저스티스
2017 .02
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
태양광발전 시스템의 특성 및 전력전자기술 적용에 대한 연구
한진욱
,
현동석
대한전기학회 학술대회 논문집
2006
.07
남중국해 영토·해양분쟁과 동아시아 국제관계
이순천
계간 외교
2012
.10
관료적 성격의 UN 조명: UN의 대한민국에 대한 지원을 중심으로
성기은
,
손대선
국제.지역연구
2017
.03
Post COVID-19 시대의 국제정치: 탈세계화, 디지털화 그리고 신냉전 질서의 도래
이상환
정치정보연구
2020
.10
Reevaluating Reforms to the United Nations Security Council : Proposing a New G20+6 Model
And
,
ew S. Milla
,
d
21세기정치학회보
2020
.03
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2021-360-001746393