메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
정선희 (이화여자대학교)
저널정보
역사교육학회 역사교육논집 역사교육논집 제74호
발행연도
2020.1
수록면
243 - 282 (40page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
<East Asian History> was newly selected as a high school advanced elective subject in the 2007 Revised Educational Curriculum. This change, led by the government, was based on the discourse on East Asian History and the efforts from the academia. Scholastic ability tests can be seen as both the end and the start of an educational curriculum, they serve the purpose of measuring how much of the lessons plan have been achieved by the students after teaching and learning. This research analyzes the content validity of 140 questions from the College Scholastic Ability Test’s <East Asian History> section from 2014~2020. 2009 and 2011 Revised Curriculum were compared and analyzed, and the components of the exam was examined by question type and year. Questions were divided into subjects of politics, economy, society, and culture based on the goal of <East Asian History>, and an additional category was added which combines two or more of the topics in a question. Furthermore, using the division of time periods suggested in the chapters of the curriculum, the proportion of questions on each time era was examined. The result of the analysis showed that the questions were centered on the topic of politics, Chapter V(mid 19th~1945). Achievement standards were used as a reference in order to inspect the questions’ compatibility with the educational curriculum. The questions were first divided by the educational curriculum that was applied and then categorized using the achievement standards. In this step, the compatibility with achievement standards was found, and commonalities among the incompatible questions were also identified. Without active research and search of new materials with the accumulated question bank, it will be difficult to create questions with high discrimination index. Since it is difficult to create questions targeting the same content and achievement standards using the limited amount of resource, it is likely there will be questions outside the content covered in the curriculum. Hence, in order to write questions that test historical knowledge from different angles, we will need <East Asian History> experts focusing on different subfields and time eras. In addition, there is a need for further research accomplishments related to <East Asian History> in the field of history. This will lead to the development of academic resources for the history instructors and will become the driving force that helps <East Asian History> settle into the school environment.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0