메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
최현우 (동명여고)
저널정보
역사교육학회 역사교육논집 역사교육논집 제76호
발행연도
2021.1
수록면
165 - 197 (33page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper selected and analyzed debate-style multiple-choice questions on the Korean history, East Asian history and World History subjects of the College Scholastic Ability Test(including mock test) and the National academic evaluation for high school seniors from 2013 to 2020. The number of debate-style questions is rare. Debate-style questions are divided into cases in which people in the past argue about the facts persons etc of that period, and cases in which people in the present argue about the facts persons etc of the past, depending on the timepoint of the person participating in the debate. There are more cases of the latter. Debate-style questions may be typified in various ways depending on the intention of the question making. In order to maximize the historical educational effects through debate-style questions, it is necessary to question the persons, organizations, and events that most students take for granted. Debate-style history classes are not held in many schools due to teachers' abilities, school and student circumstances. Under these situation, debate-style questions of the nationwide history test provide many students with a variety of opinions at that time and today, providing an opportunity to expand their awareness of ‘historical’ events and persons. This allows students to question past events that appear to have taken place ‘without controversy’ and historical descriptions that appear to have been ‘agreed.’

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0