메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
신희선 (숙명여자대학교) 서정혁 (숙명여자대학교) 황영미 (숙명여자대학교) 김지윤 (숙명여자대학교 교양교육연구소)
저널정보
한국화법학회 화법연구 화법연구 제54호
발행연도
2021.11
수록면
47 - 99 (53page)
DOI
10.18625/jsc.2021..54.47

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, on-line education was proceeded in full swing. Thus, changes were inevitable in the class of <Critical Thinking and Debate> which operated through students’ presentations and actual practices. This research contemplates the direction of university debate education in the digital era, especially based upon students’ opinions about “online debate practice” and the opening of “intensified curriculum.” This was done using surveys related with the <Critical Thinking and Debate Class> which was operated as an S-women’s university’s obligatory general education course. This research suggested the aggressive utilization of digital contents and the necessity of customized education for each learner in future debate classes considering the change of educational environment and the presence of new students. Under a full scale online classes with no restrictions on the time and space, this research claimed the necessity of strengthening the network between a professor and a learner and their communication. It also asserts to build up a real/non-real cooperative learning system. In order to strengthen the learner’s curiosity and accessibility, this research emphasized that the class should critically use various contents like YouTube video clips, soap operas in Netflix, and movies. The class also needs to be operated through an online-based participating platform where students’ various activities are easily available. It suggested the following actions as a direction for debate education in the digital era: (1), development and internalization of a step by step teaching and learning module for the learner-centered debate education; (2), institutionalization of a debate clinic with a professor’s role of tutor, coach, and curator for debate education; (3), development of micro contents and aggressive utilization of digital contents; (4), intensification of the communication track for continued debate education; (5), and establishment of online debate education model. With these, I’d like to contemplate the direction of a university’s critical thinking and debate education while reflecting "the digital difference" in the digital era.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0