지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The liberation period in Korea was when creative imagination and various debates existed about plans for political, economic, and social systems. Among them was the debate over the national health security underlying the social safety net. Although the US influenced the Korean health security after liberation, major political groups on the Korean peninsula also expressed various opinions. However, previous studies have shown little interest in national health security, which operates the public health and medical care systems. To overcome these limitations, this study focuses on the ideas on national health security presented by major political groups, analyzing the reply proposal of “Jŏnpyŏng” and the health care proposal of the US military government, which has not been reviewed before.
The opinions of major political groups including the right-wing Im-hyŏp and left-wing Min-chŏn diverged on national health security issue regarding insurance coverage, measures to secure financial resources, items of insurance benefits, and measures to stabilize the supply and demand of medical personnel. The claims of the US military government can be understood by “Labor Problems and Policies in Korea (Korean Subcommittee),” “Korean Labor Report (Stewart Meacham),” and “Proposed Political Platform Provisional Korean Democratic Government (Sub-commission #2).”
The major political groups and the US military government agreed on the need for social protection against death, old age, disability, disease, injury, and unemployment. All of them claimed national health security, in which the roles of the private sector and the government were mixed, should be gradually introduced. The major political groups, in particular, proposed to (1) set workers as beneficiaries of insurance, (2) share financial resources jointly among the state, employers, and workers, and (3) promote the expansion of the number of doctors and medical institutions and prefer cooperative operations of the hospitals established in small administrative units.
This paper argues that the ideas on national health security during the liberation period did not completely deviate from the global trend immediately after World War II when countries tried to expand the number of people covered by national health security and strengthen its coverage. Although these ideas were not fully reflected in the Constitution of 1948, it is significant in that the Constitution codified for the first time the state’s responsibility for those who have no ability for living due to their health conditions.
The opinions of major political groups including the right-wing Im-hyŏp and left-wing Min-chŏn diverged on national health security issue regarding insurance coverage, measures to secure financial resources, items of insurance benefits, and measures to stabilize the supply and demand of medical personnel. The claims of the US military government can be understood by “Labor Problems and Policies in Korea (Korean Subcommittee),” “Korean Labor Report (Stewart Meacham),” and “Proposed Political Platform Provisional Korean Democratic Government (Sub-commission #2).”
The major political groups and the US military government agreed on the need for social protection against death, old age, disability, disease, injury, and unemployment. All of them claimed national health security, in which the roles of the private sector and the government were mixed, should be gradually introduced. The major political groups, in particular, proposed to (1) set workers as beneficiaries of insurance, (2) share financial resources jointly among the state, employers, and workers, and (3) promote the expansion of the number of doctors and medical institutions and prefer cooperative operations of the hospitals established in small administrative units.
This paper argues that the ideas on national health security during the liberation period did not completely deviate from the global trend immediately after World War II when countries tried to expand the number of people covered by national health security and strengthen its coverage. Although these ideas were not fully reflected in the Constitution of 1948, it is significant in that the Constitution codified for the first time the state’s responsibility for those who have no ability for living due to their health conditions.
목차
1. 머리말
2. 주요 정치집단의 의료보장체계 논쟁
3. 미군정의 의료보장체계 구상
4. 해방기 의료보장체계 구상의 수용과 좌절
5. 해방기 의료보장 논쟁의 의사학적 함의: 다양한 의료보장 구상의 각축장으로서의 해방공간
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
한국 보건간호의 이상과 현실: 미국 간호자문관의 활동과 그 영향, 1945~1961
의사학
2024 .08
-
해방 이후 전북지역 미군정 활동
남도문화연구
2015 .06
-
상해 대한민국 임시정부의 군사전략과 ‘陸軍臨時軍制’ 변화
역사민속학
2018 .06
-
카자흐스탄 의무의료보험제도 도입 과정 연구: 킹던의 다중흐름모형 적용
러시아학
2023 .02
-
북한 주민의 일상의료 경험 : 2000년대 이후 의료지형의 환경조건과 영역별 주민 실천을 중심으로
통일인문학
2023 .03
-
중국 데이터안전법의 주요내용과 시사점: 데이터 안전보호를 위한 중점 제도를 중심으로
중국지식네트워크
2021 .01
-
코로나와 일본의 보건 · 의료체계
대한일어일문학회 학술대회 발표논문 요지집
2021 .11
-
부산청십자의료보험조합의 설립과 운영의 의의
장신논단
2021 .09
-
〈한국사회와 의료화된 몸〉
한국학연구
2018 .06
-
러시아 안보정책의 변화 : 주요 안보문서를 중심으로
슬라브학보
2018 .06
-
의료부문의 ICT 융합 관련 규제의 현황과 개선과제: 원격의료를 중심으로
사회과학연구
2017 .01
-
미군정이 만들려고 했던 한국의 공화 체제
역사비평
2019 .05
-
구술로 본 한국군 창설과 변화
한국민족운동사연구
2022 .03
-
해방 이후 大韓民國 國民議會(1947~1948년)의 활동과 성격
한국민족운동사연구
2015 .01
-
의료정책 변화 과정에서의 이익집단과 제도의 역할 분석: 영국과 미국의 비교
민족연구
2015 .01
-
미얀마 군부 지배의 역사적 고찰 - 그 정치 동력의 구조
역사비평
2021 .08
-
해방기 좌·우익 문학 논쟁 연구 -김동석과 김동리를 중심으로
한국문예비평연구
2018 .09
-
5·16 군사정부의 정치활동정화법 제정과 운용
대구사학
2016 .01
-
중국 근현대 의료사 연구의 새로운 흐름과 동향
역사학연구
2020 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0