메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
전병국 (건국대학교) 양호정 (건국대학교)
저널정보
한국러시아문학회 러시아어문학연구논집 러시아어문학연구논집 제77호
발행연도
2022.5
수록면
195 - 223 (29page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study started from the question ‘Could Russian government keep the fundamental purpose that the social welfare policy should have at least in the age of transformation that was regarded as one of the worst economic situations in Russia?’. This study also focused on the stance of Russian government towards social welfare-related workers among diverse crossroads. The situations of the times required a more firm social welfare system and more professionalized social welfare workers. At that time, social welfare-related workers were warriors to fight in the front lie of Russian social welfare field. The purpose of this study is to analyze the stance of Russian government towards social welfare-related workers in the age of transportation and classification of related policies and fundamentally understand Russian government’s real intention towards the weak. During the regime transition, Russian government cut down on finances of social welfare system and even reduced or privatized social welfare facilities that protected the social weak, under the pretext of efficient distribution of national finances. Undoubtedly, the pain of the social weak was aggravated in this process. What was the stance of Russian government towards social welfare-related workers, who played a role as the last rescue line for the social weak, this time? This study demonstrates that Russian government was indifferent to, or intentionally neglected social welfare workers. This indifference or intentional negligence of Russian government towards social welfare-related workers led to a low-quality social welfare service and ultimately played a decisive role in increasing the difficulty of the social weak. According to the Titmuss social welfare model theory, the stance of Russian government towards social welfare-related workers in the age of transformation can be classified into a residual type. Considering the tough situation that the social weak faced at that time, also, it is hard to say that this stance of Russian government was a good choice, from the perspective of social welfare.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0