메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류
인문학
인문학 일반 역사학 철학 종교학 어문학 기타 인문학
사회과학
사회과학 일반 경영학 관광학 교육학 군사학 문헌정보학 법학 사회학 신문방송학 심리과학 정치외교학 지리학 행정학 경제학 무역학 인류학 기타 사회과학
자연과학
자연과학 일반 물리학 생물학 생활과학 수학·통계학 천문학 지구과학 화학 기타 자연과학
공학
공학 일반 건축공학 기계공학 산업공학 재료·에너지공학 전기전자공학 조선해양공학 화학공학 컴퓨터학 기타공학
의약학
의학 일반 간호학 수의학 약학 한의학 기초의학 임상의학 기타 의약학
농수해양학
농수해양학 일반 농학 수산학 식품과학 임학 축산학 해상운송학 기타 농수해양학
예술체육학
예술 일반 디자인 미술 미용 사진 음악학 의상 체육 공연매체예술 기타 예술체육학
복합학
학제간연구 과학기술학 뇌인지과학 기술정책 기타 복합학

ENG

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
석광현 (서울대학교)
저널정보
한국가족법학회 가족법연구 가족법연구 제30권 제1호
발행연도
2016.3
수록면
95 - 142 (48page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In recent years, the number of family cases and succession cases pending before Korean courts (the “family cases”) has been continuingly increasing. At the same time, the number of international family cases involving a foreign element is also increasing. Against this background, Korea has acceded to the Child Abduction Convention and is making efforts to ratify the Inter-country Child Adoption Convention. Korean lawyers dealing with international family cases should have competent understanding of private international law. However, in reality, in many international family cases Korean judges have dealt with such cases as though they were purely domestic ones. In this article, the author has selected seven cases or situations, and for each case or situation, the author explains the actual treatment, points out mistakes committed by Korean lawyers and finally offers correct solutions. More concretely, the author deals with the following cases or situations: law applicable to divorce, damages for suffering, appointment as a custodian for children, and granting of right of visitation claimed by a Korean as against a foreigner (Chapter Ⅱ.); various issues under the so-called Kopino cases (Chapter Ⅲ.); law applicable to overseas adoption of Korean children in need of protection (Chapter Ⅳ.); acquisition of nationality by Korean children adopted overseas (Chapter Ⅴ.); law applicable to family name (Chapter Ⅵ.); law applicable to the form of testamentary dispositions (Chapter Ⅶ.); and recognition of a court decision made by the State of Oregon regarding appointment of custodian for children and the requirement of reciprocity (Chapter Ⅷ.). Korean courts have shown far less interest in private international law issues when dealing with international family law matters, compared with when they deal with international cases involving property law. The author would like to make the below suggestions to improve the situation. First, each and every Korean judge dealing with international family law matters should realize the importance of private international law implications. We should consider establishing “Special Panels in Charge of International Cases” in the Seoul Family Court and other family courts dealing with many international family cases. The family courts may also consider holding regular joint seminars with the Korean Private International Law Association. Secondly, more fundamentally, the education of private international law, in particular international family law, should be strengthened. Even though the international business transactions law (including private international law) is currently favored by the majority of law school students as the optional subject at the bar examination, education of private international law at law schools is not properly conducted. This is mainly because many law school students just select the subject without even taking the course at the law schools. In order to improve the current situation, major law schools should recruit full-time professors who can teach private international law. In addition, the author would like to emphasize that law school professors in charge of private law subjects should at least advise their students of the importance of the private international law where the case involves a foreign element.
#준거법 #외국판결의 승인 및 집행 #코피노 #국제입양 #아동탈취협약 #가사사건 #applicable law #recognition and enforcement of foreign judgment #Kopino #international adoption #child abduction convention #family matters

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (20)

참고문헌 신청
강현철 / 2015 / 이민법 제정을 위한 글로벌 미래법제전략 연구 google schola 곽민희 / 2014 / 헤이그아동탈취협약의 국내이행입법에 관한 검토 ― 일본의 헤이그아동탈취협약 실시법으로부터의 시사 ― / 가족법연구 28(2):1~68 dbpia 김문숙 / 2005 / 친양자제도의 도입으로 인한 국제사법에의 영향 / 국제사법연구 (11) dbpia 김선혜 / 2009 / 家事裁判의 旣判力 / 가족법연구 23(3):263~312 google schola 김시철 / 2007 / 駐韓 美國人 夫婦의 離婚 및 未成年子女에 관한 養育處分 등에 관하여 / 저스티스 (96):237~277 google schola

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0