지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2023.3
- 수록면
- 227 - 264 (38page)
- DOI
- 10.69596/JLL.2023.03.85.227
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This article aims to organize and analyze the interpretation of the standard hours for converting ordinary wages into hourly wage. We will analyze the changes in the laws and precedents regarding the method of calculating the standard hours, present the theory of interpretation in the current law, and present appropriate legislative directions.
Interpretation of it has changed according to changes in legislation and precedent. In particular, there are many issues in the interpretation of the number of contracted overtime hours, but an appropriate understanding was sought as much as possible.
In particular, there are many issues in the interpretation of hours considered for weekly holiday pay, hours of allowance to compensate for reduction in working hours, and hours reflecting contracted overtime works, but an appropriate understanding was sought as much as possible.
According to the existing interpretation, the corresponding hours of the weekly holiday pay (so hours considered for weekly holiday pay), the corresponding hours of allowance to compensate for reduction in working hours, and the hours reflected in the contracted overtime works are added to the standard hours as paid hours. Such an interpretation method has many irrational points and is not valid against the mandatory regulation.
Ultimately, a legislative solution is needed to overcome the current interpretational problems. In addition, legislation must be clearly regulated and easy to understand. In this regard, legislation that stipulates the standard hours only as the number of prescribed working hours is desirable. The specific legislative direction may vary depending on how to add respect for labor-management autonomy. The study on this is left as a future research task.
Interpretation of it has changed according to changes in legislation and precedent. In particular, there are many issues in the interpretation of the number of contracted overtime hours, but an appropriate understanding was sought as much as possible.
In particular, there are many issues in the interpretation of hours considered for weekly holiday pay, hours of allowance to compensate for reduction in working hours, and hours reflecting contracted overtime works, but an appropriate understanding was sought as much as possible.
According to the existing interpretation, the corresponding hours of the weekly holiday pay (so hours considered for weekly holiday pay), the corresponding hours of allowance to compensate for reduction in working hours, and the hours reflected in the contracted overtime works are added to the standard hours as paid hours. Such an interpretation method has many irrational points and is not valid against the mandatory regulation.
Ultimately, a legislative solution is needed to overcome the current interpretational problems. In addition, legislation must be clearly regulated and easy to understand. In this regard, legislation that stipulates the standard hours only as the number of prescribed working hours is desirable. The specific legislative direction may vary depending on how to add respect for labor-management autonomy. The study on this is left as a future research task.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가며
Ⅱ. 현행 법령 및 기존 판례
Ⅲ. 판례 해석의 비판적 검토 및 입법 방향
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
근로시간 단축법 개정의 경과와 쟁점
노동법포럼
2018 .07
-
근로기준법상 근로시간 개념에 대한 정의 및 유연성 재고
노동법포럼
2022 .11
-
근로시간의 판단 기준
노동법학
2022 .03
-
근로시간 단축의 제도적 논의와 쟁점
노동법학
2020 .03
-
일본 근로시간법제의 변천과 정책적 시사점
외법논집
2021 .08
-
표준수업시수제 도입에 관한 교원의 인식 연구
교육과학연구
2015 .09
-
일본 변형근로시간제도에 관한 연구
산업관계연구
2019 .06
-
주40시간제 도입과 기업의 교육훈련투자
산업관계연구
2015 .03
-
미국의 근로시간법제에 관한 연구
법학연구
2019 .09
-
다시간-다그룹 이중차분법을 활용한 주 52시간 근무제의 근로시간에 대한 효과 분석
경제연구
2022 .08
-
연장근로시간 기준단위의 변경에 대한 정부 입법예고안의 타당성 검토 — 프랑스 근로시간제와 비교를 중심으로 —
노동법포럼
2023 .07
-
근로시간 단축이 삶의 질에 미치는 영향 분석
질서경제저널
2022 .03
-
주 52시간 상한제가 근로자의 일·생활 균형에 미친 영향 : 성별 차이를 중심으로
이화젠더법학
2022 .08
-
생활시간 개념의 도입 필요성과 노동법적 과제
노동법논총
2023 .04
-
노동법 상 근로시간 개념의 다원성에 관한 시론
노동법논총
2018 .12
-
포르투갈의 근로시간법제에 관한 연구
노동법연구
2018 .03
-
[WATCH] HOUR CLASS
포브스 코리아
2023 .06
-
유연근로시간제 개선에 대한 연구
벤처혁신연구
2021 .09
-
근로시간 적용제외에 관한 근로기준법 제63조의 기원에 관한 연구
동북아법연구
2017 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2023-336-001343858