지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 한국일본어학회 일본어학연구 일본어학연구 제80집
- 발행연도
- 2024.6
- 수록면
- 23 - 44 (22page)
- DOI
- 10.14817/jlak.2024.80.23
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In this article, we analyzed NHK"s special disaster broadcasts that were on the air during the Great East Japan Earthquake in 2011 and the Noto Peninsula Earthquake in 2024, and found the following.
(1) In 2011, informational discourses attempted to convey the dangers of earthquakes and tsunamis mainly by using utterances to explain the situation. However, in the case of the 2024 Noto Peninsula Earthquake, they primarily used specific alert statements to warn of the dangers of earthquakes and tsunamis.
(2) Regarding call-to-action utterances, in the 2024 materials, after an utterance that called for evacuation, utterances with a high level of urgency such as “never stop or turn back” were used, and utterances with a high level of urgency were used to call for evacuation to a safe place.
(3) Regarding utterances that called for evacuation, during the Great East Japan Earthquake of 2011, the expression “Please evacuate to safe high ground as soon as possible” was repeatedly used. However, in the analysis materials for 2024, expressions with a high degree of urgency and explicitness, such as “Run to the highest possible place immediately,” were used, and the frequency of expressions was three times higher than that in 2011. Furthermore, as tsunami warnings changed to major tsunami warnings and the situation became more serious, expressions calling for evacuation changed from request expressions to command expressions, such as “Please run away immediately!” → “Evacuate now!”
(4) Finally, compared to that in 2011, text information in 2024 covered the entire screen of the broadcast video, and text information rather than live footage of the tsunami was used to warn of the dangers of tsunamis. Furthermore, by displaying expressions that called for evacuation such as “Tsunami! Evacuation!, Tsunami! Evacuate!, EVACUATE! Tsunami! Evacuate!” directly on the broadcast screen, residents who were watching TV were actively asked to evacuate.
(1) In 2011, informational discourses attempted to convey the dangers of earthquakes and tsunamis mainly by using utterances to explain the situation. However, in the case of the 2024 Noto Peninsula Earthquake, they primarily used specific alert statements to warn of the dangers of earthquakes and tsunamis.
(2) Regarding call-to-action utterances, in the 2024 materials, after an utterance that called for evacuation, utterances with a high level of urgency such as “never stop or turn back” were used, and utterances with a high level of urgency were used to call for evacuation to a safe place.
(3) Regarding utterances that called for evacuation, during the Great East Japan Earthquake of 2011, the expression “Please evacuate to safe high ground as soon as possible” was repeatedly used. However, in the analysis materials for 2024, expressions with a high degree of urgency and explicitness, such as “Run to the highest possible place immediately,” were used, and the frequency of expressions was three times higher than that in 2011. Furthermore, as tsunami warnings changed to major tsunami warnings and the situation became more serious, expressions calling for evacuation changed from request expressions to command expressions, such as “Please run away immediately!” → “Evacuate now!”
(4) Finally, compared to that in 2011, text information in 2024 covered the entire screen of the broadcast video, and text information rather than live footage of the tsunami was used to warn of the dangers of tsunamis. Furthermore, by displaying expressions that called for evacuation such as “Tsunami! Evacuation!, Tsunami! Evacuate!, EVACUATE! Tsunami! Evacuate!” directly on the broadcast screen, residents who were watching TV were actively asked to evacuate.
목차
Abstract
1. 머리말
2. 선행연구 및 연구목적
3. 연구방법
4. 분석
5. 나오며
참고문헌
要旨
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
사회적 재난 방송 뉴스 보도 화면 분석 : 이태원 참사 보도 화면 구성으로 본 저널리즘 실천 방식
윤호영
,
오령
한국방송학보
2024
.07
재난 보도 영상 화면의 피해자 묘사에 대한 뉴스 이용자의 뉴스 가치 평가
오령
,
윤호영
한국언론학보
2024
.06
재난사고에 대한 공영방송과 상업방송 간 의제 비교 : 〈KBS〉와〈채널A〉의 세월호 보도 키워드와 네트워크 분석을 통해
이완수
,
최명일
한국언론학보
2022
.12
동일본대지진 이후 재해 지역에서는 지역 부흥을 위한 어떠한 지식이 생겨났는가 : 《진재학》의 10년사를 통해
윤여일
경제와사회
2021
.03
국내 재난 주관방송사의 재난보도 프레임 분석 : 지카 바이러스 보도를 중심으로
최믿음
,
정희수
한국콘텐츠학회논문지
2018
.07
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0