메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
손장훈 (동북아역사재단)
저널정보
동양사학회 동양사학연구 東洋史學硏究 第167輯
발행연도
2024.6
수록면
451 - 481 (31page)
DOI
10.17856/jahs.2024.6.167.451

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Work team, traditional mechanism of Chinese Communist Party’s(hereafter CCP) politics, is inseparable from mass line. Work team functioned as ‘transmission belt’ of party-state, encouraging people’s political participation. During Chinese revolution, red army employed work team and the team proved how useful it is. As the result, CCP actively used work team as key tool for mass movement. Among contemporary China’s work team, the team organized for Land Reform has been highlighted. Work team in rural area of early 1950s was more powerful than any other governmental organs and local authorities in land reform.
Although it hinders stabilization of state system, the work team in countryside was loyal ‘trans mission belt’ of party-state. On the other hand, it was clear that urban work team had different characteristic when focusing on the Shanghai case. Work team in 1950’s Shanghai had its own view about mass movement and did not respect party-state enough. For instance, in re-election of Shanghai neighborhood leadership, work team had its own nominee and put them into resident’s committee even if they were not someone that party-state wanted. Also in other works such as rectifying street vendors or labor-employment campaign, they did not do what party-state wanted but stick to what they believe. It shape the new picture of state-society relationship in early PRC that work team and party-state had different opinion with mass movement. So called transmission belt between CCP and Chinese was not so loyal and could distort party-state’s original intent.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 정치 기제로서의 工作隊: 탄생과 정착
Ⅲ. 上海市의 工作隊: 정치 기제의 문제점
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-151-24-02-090135036