메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
윤인애 (단국대학교) 정태린 (단국대학교)
저널정보
한국체육정책학회 한국체육정책학회지 한국체육정책학회지 제23권 제1호
발행연도
2025.2
수록면
55 - 68 (14page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
sports. These disputes occur across all sectors, including school sports (involving student athletes), professional sports, recreational sports, and sports for individuals with disabilities. The issue is that South Korea currently lacks a well-established policy system for addressing sports disputes. Given the increasing need for qualitative development to support the broader growth of the sports industry in the country, research on policies for resolving sports disputes has become even more crucial. The primary objective of this study is to explore possible solutions for resolving sports disputes through a systematic literature review, focusing on the parties involved, existing dispute resolution proposals, and current resolution mechanisms, in order to propose practical solutions.
The key findings are summarized as follows: First, Sports disputes can be categorized into conflicts involving individuals, organizations, national team athletes, and other types. Second, methods for resolving sports disputes include informal mediation and agreements between the parties involved, formal mediation and agreements facilitated by national institutions or sports organizations, and litigation. Lastly, As a suitable solution for addressing sports disputes within the South Korean context, the study proposes the establishment and operation of a "Sports Dispute Arbitration" system.
In conclusion, sports disputes cannot be effectively resolved through individual agreements or dialogue alone. It is now urgent to establish and implement policy-based mechanisms for resolution. This study aims to serve as a foundational step toward that goal.

목차

Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
Ⅱ. 연구방법
Ⅲ. 연구 결과
Ⅳ. 논의
Ⅴ. 스포츠분쟁중재기관(가칭)의 제안
Ⅵ. 결론 및 제언
참고문헌
ABSTRACT

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-25-02-092493938