지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 중국어문학연구회 중국어문학논집 中國語文學論集 第150號
- 발행연도
- 2025.2
- 수록면
- 147 - 181 (35page)
- DOI
- 10.25021/JCLL.2025.2.150.147
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Culpeper (1996) proposed the theory and strategy of impolite, and his research laid the foundation for the study of impolite language, which led to the gradual independence of impolite language research from the study of polite language.
Looking back at the research achievements of Chinese scholars in the field of impolite language, this paper finds that in the past two decades, scholars have achieved various and fruitful research results in the field of impolite language. The research perspectives include: impolite language theory, impolite strategy, impolite language function in different communication situations, and comparison with other languages.
This paper considers it necessary to conduct research on impolite evaluation. Culpeper (2011) defines impolite language as “a comprehensive evaluation of the understanding of impolite language, combining corpus, context, and communication environment.” When language users appear as observers of language communication, their evaluation of impolite language can reflect people’s perception of impolite language to some extent, and can also help us understand the nature of impolite language more fully.
In particular, this paper aims to investigate how the impolite language phenomenon occurs in Chinese context by combining questionnaires and interviews from the perspective of user evaluation, taking the impolite language strategy as the core of Culpeper’s theory. The evaluation research of this paper includes two aspects, one is the evaluation of the nature of impolite language by Chinese speakers, that is, whether the communication language is impolite language. The second is to evaluate the degree of linguistic phenomena that Chinese users generally believe to be impolite, that is, to evaluate the degree of impolite.
Through questionnaires, interviews, statistics and analysis, it is found that the evaluation of Chinese speakers’ language communication behavior in the Chinese context is inconsistent with Culpeper’s impolite language strategy. This paper also finds that Chinese speakers evaluate the degree of impolite language behavior under the impolite language strategy and presents different levels of impolite language behavior. The degree of impoliteness is mainly influenced by factors such as personal perception, word-making, moral convention and stereotype.
To sum up, this paper hopes to provide another research perspective for the study of impolite language: from the perspective of language user evaluation. At the same time, this study draws a graph of the degree of impolite, which is expected to provide a quantitative reference value for people to understand the degree of impolite.
Looking back at the research achievements of Chinese scholars in the field of impolite language, this paper finds that in the past two decades, scholars have achieved various and fruitful research results in the field of impolite language. The research perspectives include: impolite language theory, impolite strategy, impolite language function in different communication situations, and comparison with other languages.
This paper considers it necessary to conduct research on impolite evaluation. Culpeper (2011) defines impolite language as “a comprehensive evaluation of the understanding of impolite language, combining corpus, context, and communication environment.” When language users appear as observers of language communication, their evaluation of impolite language can reflect people’s perception of impolite language to some extent, and can also help us understand the nature of impolite language more fully.
In particular, this paper aims to investigate how the impolite language phenomenon occurs in Chinese context by combining questionnaires and interviews from the perspective of user evaluation, taking the impolite language strategy as the core of Culpeper’s theory. The evaluation research of this paper includes two aspects, one is the evaluation of the nature of impolite language by Chinese speakers, that is, whether the communication language is impolite language. The second is to evaluate the degree of linguistic phenomena that Chinese users generally believe to be impolite, that is, to evaluate the degree of impolite.
Through questionnaires, interviews, statistics and analysis, it is found that the evaluation of Chinese speakers’ language communication behavior in the Chinese context is inconsistent with Culpeper’s impolite language strategy. This paper also finds that Chinese speakers evaluate the degree of impolite language behavior under the impolite language strategy and presents different levels of impolite language behavior. The degree of impoliteness is mainly influenced by factors such as personal perception, word-making, moral convention and stereotype.
To sum up, this paper hopes to provide another research perspective for the study of impolite language: from the perspective of language user evaluation. At the same time, this study draws a graph of the degree of impolite, which is expected to provide a quantitative reference value for people to understand the degree of impolite.
목차
1. 緒論
2. 不禮貌評價的旣往硏究
3. 不禮貌評價的必要性及理論基礎
4. 不禮貌評價的實證考察
5. 影響評價的因素
6. 結論
參考文獻
ABSTRACT
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
近二十年中國國內“不禮貌”硏究現狀綜述
중국어문학논집
2024 .12
-
불손발화에서 나타나는 경어사용과 청자반응 -상하관계와 발화의 직접성을 중심으로-
외국학연구
2022 .03
-
멕시코 TV 대선 토론에 드러난 언어적 무례 양상
스페인어문학
2019 .01
-
A Cross-Cultural Perspective on Impoliteness and Emotions: The Case of Korean and English
현대영어영문학
2023 .05
-
漢語與韓國語禮貌語用策略對比硏究
중국어문학논집
2020 .02
-
한국어 문법 교육에서의 화용 정보 기술에 대한 고찰
이중언어학
2015 .01
-
The Variable Use of a Pragmatic Marker, Please
담화·인지언어학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2017 .11
-
The Role of Cultural Values and Perception as Reflected in Korean Request Strategies
언어과학연구
2015 .06
-
화용론의 위상 정립을 위한 몇 가지 문제 : 개념 정의 및 연구 대상을 중심으로
한글
2016 .09
-
담화완성과업과 채팅에 나타난 대학생들의 영어요청행위
외국학연구
2022 .03
-
“是…的”(2)구문의 화용적 특징과 교육
중국어문학논집
2017 .12
-
An Investigation into the Effects of Pragmatic Instruction and Feedback on the Development of Pragmatic Competence o f Korean University Students
영어교과교육
2019 .01
-
한국어 중급 교재 문법 설명에서의 화용 정보 기술에 대한 연구
언어사실과 관점
2021 .11
-
국어사전의 화용 정보 현황에 대한 비판적 고찰
언어사실과 관점
2021 .01
-
화용론의 현재와 미래 : 언어 연구의 방법적 성격과 외연을 중심으로
어문론집
2015 .06
-
Cognition and Language Learning
Journal of Asia TEFL
2021 .01
-
Current Trends and Prospects of Semantics-Pragmatics Research
언어와언어학
2023 .05
-
What Is a Good Microteaching to Pre-service English Teachers?: Self-evaluation According to Evaluation Types
신영어영문학
2021 .11
-
호칭어의 전략적 사용: 위대한 유산을 중심으로
영어영문학연구
2022 .02
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-25-02-092458288