지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Regarding the time point of the Koguryo dynasty's capital transfer to the Guknae region, there have been two theories suggested so far: One of them suggested that the capital transfer took place during the reign of King Sansang-wang(山上王), and one of them suggested that the event took place during the reign of King Yuri-wang(琉璃王). The former theory was mostly presented by the Japanese scholars, who did not consider the records of the early days' accession line of Koguryo Kings and other records as well to be bearing any kind of credibility. On the other hand, the latter theory was supported by the Korean scholars who perceived the early days' records as credible sources of information. As we can see, the issue of ascertaining the time period of Koguryo dynasty's capital transfer to the Guknae region, is also an issue of debate, which had frequently represented in the past the colliding perspectives of scholars who viewed the history of the Koguryo dynasty's early days in very different ways.
Thorough examination of related records and historical texts revealed that, during the reign of King Sansang-wang, the capital was not transferred but only moved from its ordinary location inside the Guknae region to a military defense fortress. Therefore the validity of the former theory seems to be successfully refuted. But there are also sections inside the 『Samguk Sagi』 text's Koguryo chapter, especially the portions which are mentioning the early days' history, that contain certain notions that were changed or distorted from the original feature of contents in certain ways, and because of that possibility, we are really not ready to say that the capital transfer took place during the reign of King Yuri-wang either.
The capital transfer to the Guknae region should presumably have taken place during the middle or latter half period of the 1st century. A defense concept based upon the critical functions of the Guknae region was established around that time as well. At the time, the Chinese Hu-Han(後漢) dynasty turned to adopt a foreign policy based upon appeasement, and in response, the Koguryo dynasty reinforced its own ruling structure and embarked upon an active foreign campaign. Koguryo particularly concentrated its efforts upon the Dong-Okjeo(東沃沮) region which was left unguarded as Hu-Han decided to assume a more inoffensive position in the area.
The Guknae region, compared to the Jolbon region, was located in a position far from the Hyeonto-gun(玄菟郡) unit of the Hu-Han dynasty, and was the central point of the Abrok-gang river network. The Koguryo dynasty must have proceeded with the capital transfer to the Guknae region, under the intention of seizing control of the Abrok-gang river network, consolidating the ruling structure of the dynasty, escaping the interventions of the Chinese Hu-Han dynasty and enlarge its own influence upon the Eastern coastal areas. In other words, the capital transfer was a result of a national policy, which was targeted at a large triumphant development for the dynasty, and which effectively utilized foreign situations of the time, to do so.
Thorough examination of related records and historical texts revealed that, during the reign of King Sansang-wang, the capital was not transferred but only moved from its ordinary location inside the Guknae region to a military defense fortress. Therefore the validity of the former theory seems to be successfully refuted. But there are also sections inside the 『Samguk Sagi』 text's Koguryo chapter, especially the portions which are mentioning the early days' history, that contain certain notions that were changed or distorted from the original feature of contents in certain ways, and because of that possibility, we are really not ready to say that the capital transfer took place during the reign of King Yuri-wang either.
The capital transfer to the Guknae region should presumably have taken place during the middle or latter half period of the 1st century. A defense concept based upon the critical functions of the Guknae region was established around that time as well. At the time, the Chinese Hu-Han(後漢) dynasty turned to adopt a foreign policy based upon appeasement, and in response, the Koguryo dynasty reinforced its own ruling structure and embarked upon an active foreign campaign. Koguryo particularly concentrated its efforts upon the Dong-Okjeo(東沃沮) region which was left unguarded as Hu-Han decided to assume a more inoffensive position in the area.
The Guknae region, compared to the Jolbon region, was located in a position far from the Hyeonto-gun(玄菟郡) unit of the Hu-Han dynasty, and was the central point of the Abrok-gang river network. The Koguryo dynasty must have proceeded with the capital transfer to the Guknae region, under the intention of seizing control of the Abrok-gang river network, consolidating the ruling structure of the dynasty, escaping the interventions of the Chinese Hu-Han dynasty and enlarge its own influence upon the Eastern coastal areas. In other words, the capital transfer was a result of a national policy, which was targeted at a large triumphant development for the dynasty, and which effectively utilized foreign situations of the time, to do so.
목차
Ⅰ. 머 리 말
Ⅱ. 國內 遷都의 시기
Ⅲ. 國內 遷都의 배경
Ⅳ. 맺 음 말
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
漢과 高句麗의 關係
고구려발해연구
2002 .12
-
中國學界의 高句麗 對外關係史 硏究現況
한국고대사연구
2003 .09
-
韓國 史書에 나타난 高句麗의 正體性
고구려발해연구
2004 .12
-
高麗의 高句麗 繼承意識
고구려발해연구
2004 .12
-
[기획1 : 한ㆍ중 역사인식의 접점] 「광개토왕릉비」에 나타난 고구려의 대중인식(對中認識)과 대외정책
역사와현실
2005 .03
-
高句麗史
성곡논총
1997 .07
-
4세기 후반~5세기 초엽 고구려(高句麗)와 백제(百濟)의 국경 변천
역사와현실
2012 .06
-
고구려와 북방민족의 관계에 대한 중화인민공화국 학계의 견해
고구려발해연구
2007 .12
-
4~5세기 고구려에 유입된 중국계 인물의 동향-문헌자료를 중심으로-
한국고대사연구
2003 .12
-
北方民族史에서 본 高句麗의 正體性 : 鮮卑, 契丹, 柔然을 중심으로
고구려발해연구
2004 .12
-
고구려 벽화를 통해서 본 고구려의 정체성 연구
고구려발해연구
2007 .12
-
중화인민공화국 학계의 고구려 유민 연구 검토
고구려발해연구
2007 .12
-
朝鮮 時代의 高句麗 認識
고구려발해연구
2004 .12
-
고구려 발해의 상관성 연구와 과제
고구려발해연구
2008 .07
-
고구려 中期天下觀의 推移
고구려발해연구
2008 .03
-
唐朝의 高句麗人軍事集團
동북아역사논총
2009 .06
-
高句麗 國內城期의 도성 경관과 토지 이용
고구려발해연구
2019 .11
-
고구려 후기 고구려, 수ㆍ당, 북방 제국의 대립관계
고구려발해연구
2007 .12
-
연변 지역 고구려 유적의 현황과 과제
동북아역사논총
2012 .12
-
中國 內 高句麗遺蹟에서 出土된 高句麗土器 硏究
중국사연구
2007 .01
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-017871824