지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This thesis is compared in the four(Ⅰ-Ⅳ) chapters :
Ⅰ. Intoduction
Ⅱ. Proposition of question and Methodology
Ⅲ. Head Thesis :
A. Myths in the ancient Near Eastern Text
B. Mythical description of Old Testament and Danggun Myth
C. Common points and difference between ancient Near Eastern and myths of Old Testament
D. Heavenly Meeting(Council) in myth of Dangun and Mission's tale (Calling's story)
Ⅳ. Conclusion : Theophany of God in Cult and history : mythical kingship and mythical kingdom of ancient Israel plus Dangun's kingship.
We as Korean have myths in our History of ancient Chosun. Among them have we Dangun Myth that has similar instance as like of the ancient Near Eastern and biblical myth. Also I have interest in Dangun Myth. Especially is Dangun Myth specialized nowadays by many scholars in a broad sense Dangun myth can be belonged to the ancient Near Eastern Myth in the shape of culture.
The ancient Near Eastern myths and the creation story of Old Testament emphasize on creation of Human. The former is planed out Hierarch structurally, but the latter has relations to human directly.
Especially in Dangun Myth is abstracted Hongik-Inkan as a meaning of salvation of human in Dangun Myth. Also this ancient thought and literature is easily approachable to biblical myth.
While the former calls son of God and daughter of God from the poly theistic sphere(=Coterie), the latter calls created Being of God in the sphere of the world.
There are two classes that is ruling class and working class in the ancient Near Eastern myths. Of a member of ruling class rebels against the highest ruler(God), is he ruled out his own status during heavenly Meeting. During heavenly Meeting presides the highest God conversation and debate of the gods(rulers) and he decide according to his own plan and will.
In spite of that are belonged this affairs to the decision through heavenly Meeting. Buy a thing in common of both is based on the History in a world. This thought os demythologized not only in the sphere of Old Testament, but also in heaven Meeing of Dangun Myth, that is Hongik-Inkan in ancient Cho-Sun period. In spite of demythologization uses the Bible mythical narration in working of God. Instead of the mythical persons appear the general human on the stage and they help and disturb the human things. We call this phase "Theophany" in another word. The God Jahwe has blessed the human, but he gave not divine right to him(them).
Because God will not consent ruling class between God and human. But the highest 띠 of Canaanites dwells in steadily statics, the God Baal goes down in the world and nature and he works functionally. But God of Old Testament accomplish two functions in oneself.
Also our ruler sovereignty of the world is only Jahwe and all of human being and worker are his subjects(=vasals) in the equality(in principle of equality).
Ⅰ. Intoduction
Ⅱ. Proposition of question and Methodology
Ⅲ. Head Thesis :
A. Myths in the ancient Near Eastern Text
B. Mythical description of Old Testament and Danggun Myth
C. Common points and difference between ancient Near Eastern and myths of Old Testament
D. Heavenly Meeting(Council) in myth of Dangun and Mission's tale (Calling's story)
Ⅳ. Conclusion : Theophany of God in Cult and history : mythical kingship and mythical kingdom of ancient Israel plus Dangun's kingship.
We as Korean have myths in our History of ancient Chosun. Among them have we Dangun Myth that has similar instance as like of the ancient Near Eastern and biblical myth. Also I have interest in Dangun Myth. Especially is Dangun Myth specialized nowadays by many scholars in a broad sense Dangun myth can be belonged to the ancient Near Eastern Myth in the shape of culture.
The ancient Near Eastern myths and the creation story of Old Testament emphasize on creation of Human. The former is planed out Hierarch structurally, but the latter has relations to human directly.
Especially in Dangun Myth is abstracted Hongik-Inkan as a meaning of salvation of human in Dangun Myth. Also this ancient thought and literature is easily approachable to biblical myth.
While the former calls son of God and daughter of God from the poly theistic sphere(=Coterie), the latter calls created Being of God in the sphere of the world.
There are two classes that is ruling class and working class in the ancient Near Eastern myths. Of a member of ruling class rebels against the highest ruler(God), is he ruled out his own status during heavenly Meeting. During heavenly Meeting presides the highest God conversation and debate of the gods(rulers) and he decide according to his own plan and will.
In spite of that are belonged this affairs to the decision through heavenly Meeting. Buy a thing in common of both is based on the History in a world. This thought os demythologized not only in the sphere of Old Testament, but also in heaven Meeing of Dangun Myth, that is Hongik-Inkan in ancient Cho-Sun period. In spite of demythologization uses the Bible mythical narration in working of God. Instead of the mythical persons appear the general human on the stage and they help and disturb the human things. We call this phase "Theophany" in another word. The God Jahwe has blessed the human, but he gave not divine right to him(them).
Because God will not consent ruling class between God and human. But the highest 띠 of Canaanites dwells in steadily statics, the God Baal goes down in the world and nature and he works functionally. But God of Old Testament accomplish two functions in oneself.
Also our ruler sovereignty of the world is only Jahwe and all of human being and worker are his subjects(=vasals) in the equality(in principle of equality).
목차
Ⅰ. 서설
Ⅱ. 문제제기와 방법론
Ⅲ. 본론
Ⅳ. 결론
＜참고문헌＞
＜Abstract＞
참고문헌 (9)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
단군설화의 역사 비평적 해석
고조선단군학
2005 .12
-
[특집-단군신화연구] 그 신비한 춤: 단군신화에 나타난 성 상징주의
고조선단군학
2002 .06
-
교과서에 서술된 ‘단군과 고조선’에 관한 고찰 : 문학교과서(7차 교육과정)를 중심으로
고조선단군학
2007 .06
-
단군신화와 서양신화의 비교연구 : 여성학적 해석을 중심으로
종교문화연구
2002 .10
-
식민지시대의 한국 신화의 위상
비평문학
2009 .03
-
한ㆍ중 건국 시조신화 비교 연구 : 상고시대 신화를 중심으로
우리말글
2008 .08
-
단군 : 역사와 신화, 그리고 민족
역사비평
2016 .11
-
단순신화의 단군 왕검의 고의 (古義) 연구
한국기독교신학논총
2000 .06
-
한국 곰 신화에 나타난 자연과 인간의 문제
민속학연구
2011 .12
-
맥락적 해석에 의한 김알지 신화와 신라문화의 정체성 재인식
비교민속학
2007 .02
-
중국의 신화와 역사 : 고대 왕조신화의 역사화를 중심으로
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2000 .03
-
신화(myth)와 철학
철학연구
1987 .06
-
The Concept of God in the Idea of Hongik ingan
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2009 .09
-
서사무가를 통해 본 한국 신화의 시간인식체계 연구
겨레어문학
2014 .01
-
顧？剛의 신화연구, 방법과 의도 － 古史(신화) 批判을 통한 儒敎 傳統의 해체
대동문화연구
2003 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-017255615