지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper is focused on the ambivalence of the national discourse in Lee Guang-Su’s latter literatures. Especially, this paper is examined about aspects that the national discourse accepted Japanese colonialism. Spontaneously the national discourse was transfigured and occurred a crack. The national literature, therefore, wasn’t stitched up as the colonial discourse of Japan Empire. This thesis payed attention to “Identifications” and “differences” that occurred in the process of the Narrative.
Japanese Empire carried a conscription regime of colony Chosun into effect, so called, by the policy of “Huanminhwa”(Be national people in Japan) and “Nasunilche”(Be one between Japan and Chosun). The colonial discourse, however, could not help exposing the differences and the cracks because it had an ironic duplicity of itself in the colonial field.
Lee Guang-Su’s latter articles imitates the logic of the cooperation between Japan and Chosun by Japanese colonialsm. The differences against Japanese colonial discourse had broken out in the narrative process of the articles, though. The colonial discourse as Japanese national literature were also written in Lee Guang-Su’s novels. For example, 〈Indeed, sincere hearts meet each other〉(진정 마음이 만나서야 말로), 〈Their love〉(그들의 사랑) showed the emphasis that the policy of “Nasunilche”(Be one between Japan and Chosun) couldn’t have been come true if Japanese people had not change their prejudice for Chosun people. Namely, the narrative of an enlightenment went into reverse. Further, 〈The fly〉(파리) should the aspect that the subject who had to be enlightened became a laughstock by showing the overreaction pursuiting Japanese colonial discourse in the narrative process.
Lee Guang-Su’s national discourse was replaced by Japanese colonial discourse, so called the discourse of “Huanminhwa”(Be national people in Japan) in his national literature. However this national discourse didn’t be absorbed to Japanese dominant discourse. On the contrary, this National discourse gave form to the crack against Japanese colonial discourse.
Japanese Empire carried a conscription regime of colony Chosun into effect, so called, by the policy of “Huanminhwa”(Be national people in Japan) and “Nasunilche”(Be one between Japan and Chosun). The colonial discourse, however, could not help exposing the differences and the cracks because it had an ironic duplicity of itself in the colonial field.
Lee Guang-Su’s latter articles imitates the logic of the cooperation between Japan and Chosun by Japanese colonialsm. The differences against Japanese colonial discourse had broken out in the narrative process of the articles, though. The colonial discourse as Japanese national literature were also written in Lee Guang-Su’s novels. For example, 〈Indeed, sincere hearts meet each other〉(진정 마음이 만나서야 말로), 〈Their love〉(그들의 사랑) showed the emphasis that the policy of “Nasunilche”(Be one between Japan and Chosun) couldn’t have been come true if Japanese people had not change their prejudice for Chosun people. Namely, the narrative of an enlightenment went into reverse. Further, 〈The fly〉(파리) should the aspect that the subject who had to be enlightened became a laughstock by showing the overreaction pursuiting Japanese colonial discourse in the narrative process.
Lee Guang-Su’s national discourse was replaced by Japanese colonial discourse, so called the discourse of “Huanminhwa”(Be national people in Japan) in his national literature. However this national discourse didn’t be absorbed to Japanese dominant discourse. On the contrary, this National discourse gave form to the crack against Japanese colonial discourse.
목차
1. 서론
2. 식민주의 담론인 ‘내선일체’의 이중성
3. ‘황민화’ 담론의 모방을 통한 동일화와 차이
4. 계몽 서사의 역전과 ‘국민문학’의 양가성
5. 결론
참고문헌
[Abstract]
참고문헌 (21)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
1910년대 이광수 단편소설의 '정'의 양가성 연구
어문학
2005 .09
-
만주국 시기 조선인 이민담론의 시론적 고찰 : 조선일보 사설을 중심으로
동북아역사논총
2011 .03
-
Discourse Functions of New-this
담화·인지언어학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2004 .04
-
해방이후 우익 민족 담론의 공고화 과정(1945~1953) : 일간지를 중심으로
역사학보
2008 .06
-
1910년대 이광수 문학에 나타난 '준비론'의 양가성
어문학
2004 .12
-
조선어학회 사건 관련 언어 민족주의 담론 분석
언어사실과 관점
2017 .01
-
라깡의 네 가지 담론
현대정신분석
2004 .08
-
‘수필’ 개념을 둘러싼 학술 담론과 교육 담론의 긴장
문학교육학
2019 .01
-
담화 단위와 의미
한국어학
2017 .11
-
민족문학, 제3세계, 동아시아 - 최원식의 동아시아론의 계보와 구조
동방학지
2020 .01
-
중국어 담화표지어 유형 및 중한 대조 연구
담화와인지
2016 .02
-
민족을 넘어서? : 한일관계의 화해를 위한 아시아 신학모색 : 남한의 한 여성신학자의 관점에서
신학연구
2008 .06
-
Reference in Korean Discourse
Korea Journal
1979 .02
-
Discourse Connection and the Choice of This or That
담화와인지
2003 .12
-
식민지말기 지배담론과 국민문학론
우리말글
2008 .12
-
Some Thoughts on Discourse markers
영어영문학
2003 .12
-
"Thank You" and "You're Welcome" in Spoken Discourse
담화와인지
1999 .12
-
담화유형별 선호 논항 구조
담화와인지
2005 .12
-
한중 담화표지 대조연구 : 개념과 특징을 중심으로
언어학 연구
2018 .07
-
한국어 담론 철학 : 분석담론의 경우
철학연구
2009 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-810-015975216