지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
FCC changed newspaper/broadcast cross-ownership rules on Dec. 18, 2007. FCC replaced the blanket ban on newspaper/broadcast cross-ownership with a rule that establishes clear presumptions as to the limited circumstances when FCC will presume a newspaper/broadcast transaction will be in the public interest and thus a waiver of the ban should be granted. The new rules adopt a presumption, in the top 20 Designated Market Areas ("DMAs"), that it is not inconsistent with the public interest for one entity to own a daily newspaper and a radio station or, under the following limited circumstances, a daily newspaper and a television station, if (1) the television station is not ranked among the top four stations in the DMA and (2) at least eight independent "major media voices" remain in the DMA. In all other instances, FCC adopt a presumption that a newspaper/broadcast station combination would not be in the public interest, with two limited exceptions, (1) a failed/failing station model and (2) a new source of a significant amount of local news in a market by a proposed combination.
But, even if the changed rules were limited to the top 20 markets by a method of presumption, those would permit new cross-owned combinations from the largest markets down to the smallest markets. For many years, the underpinnings of FCC's public interest analysis with regard to media have been to promote localism, competition, and diversity. Yet as a result of newspaper-broadcast cross-ownership, there is less local news in the market as a whole and there is less competition for stories and ideas since two competing entities become one. There is also less diversity, as a voice in the market is lost, and broadcast outlets are taken even further out of reach of minority such as women and people of color.
Recently it is said that there will be a policy of Korean government which will take a step toward newspaper-broadcast cross-ownership as result of FCC's changed rule. However the perfect survey and research should be done and the particular situation of market in newspaper and broadcast in Korea before the change of rules or laws, not merely following the FCC's precedents. And media ownership regulation must strengthen the vital function the media plays in a democratic society: decreasing citizens' costs in monitoring government and maximize output of political news.
But, even if the changed rules were limited to the top 20 markets by a method of presumption, those would permit new cross-owned combinations from the largest markets down to the smallest markets. For many years, the underpinnings of FCC's public interest analysis with regard to media have been to promote localism, competition, and diversity. Yet as a result of newspaper-broadcast cross-ownership, there is less local news in the market as a whole and there is less competition for stories and ideas since two competing entities become one. There is also less diversity, as a voice in the market is lost, and broadcast outlets are taken even further out of reach of minority such as women and people of color.
Recently it is said that there will be a policy of Korean government which will take a step toward newspaper-broadcast cross-ownership as result of FCC's changed rule. However the perfect survey and research should be done and the particular situation of market in newspaper and broadcast in Korea before the change of rules or laws, not merely following the FCC's precedents. And media ownership regulation must strengthen the vital function the media plays in a democratic society: decreasing citizens' costs in monitoring government and maximize output of political news.
목차
Ⅰ. 이 글의 계기
Ⅱ. FCC 2003년 결정 이전의 변천과정
Ⅲ. FCC 2003년 결정에서의 미디어 소유 규제(Media Ownership Rule)의 주요내용
Ⅳ. FCC 2003년 결정에 대한 2004년 미국연방항소법원의 판결
Ⅴ. FCC 2007년 결정과 반대의견
Ⅵ. FCC 2007년 결정의 검토
Ⅶ. 맺음말
[Abstract]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
방송통신 융합 시대의 신문방송 소유 겸영 규제 정책
방송통신연구
2008 .07
-
신문법 내 소유규제 제도의 형성과 해체에 관한 연구
한국언론정보학보
2011 .11
-
신문과 방송의 교차소유 규제완화에 관한 찬반론 분석
언론과법
2008 .06
-
지상파방송 규제의 현황과 방송법 개정의 쟁점 및 전망
경제규제와 법
2009 .05
-
호주의 방송규제 개혁과 미디어다양성 문제
행정법연구
2009 .08
-
미국에서의 방송통신융합법제의 현황과 전망 : FCC 정책에 대한 법원의 제동과 오바마 정부의 당면과제
언론과법
2010 .06
-
독일 노드라인베스트활렌 주 미디어법의 신문방송 교차소유 규제 개정 논쟁에 관한 연구
한국방송학보
2011 .01
-
미국 방송매체의 음란/외설 규제정책의 변화과정 분석
방송통신연구
2007 .12
-
지방신문의 양적 팽창과 문제점
한국언론정보학보
2001 .05
-
탈규제와 문화적 다양성 : 미국 지상파방송과 케이블의 소수인종 소유구조를 중심으로
방송통신연구
2002 .12
-
미디어산업의 선진화와 민주주의의 위기 : 한나라당의 미디어 관련 7개 법률 개정안 중 방송 소유 규제를 중심으로
언론과법
2008 .12
-
신문법 위헌소송의 주요 쟁점에 관한 연구
한국언론정보학보
2006 .02
-
미국의 매체규제 완화 논쟁
방송통신연구
2003 .07
-
통신정책결정에 영향을 미치는 이익집단 및 정치적 제도 요인에 관한 연구: 미국 연방통신위원회(FCC)의 “판결적 규칙제정결정(adjudicative rule-making decisions)”을 중심으로
세계지역연구논총
2008 .01
-
방송산업의 현황과 방송저작권의 과제
강원법학
2014 .06
-
The Newspaper Crisis in Japan
한국언론학회 심포지움 및 세미나
2009 .08
-
미디어 교차소유의 정치경제학적 비판
한국언론정보학보
2009 .02
-
지역신문 현황 분석과 변화 방향
한국비교정부학보
2017 .01
-
디지털시대 방송교육의 방향과 패러다임 전망
방송통신연구
2002 .07
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0