개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study analyzes the ‘Jeju Sam-il Incident’(Event of 1 March, 1947) in view of the perspectives of Jeju history itself and Jejueans (Jeju Islanders). It is reviewed on the ‘Sam-il Incident’ focusing on the ‘Sam-il’ demonstration and leading group of general strike. The consequences of the study are as follows:
First, ‘Sam-il Incident’ is the example in the people's movement history which originated from Jeju struggle during the traditional era and anti-Japanese colonial rule struggle. In ‘Sam-il’ ceremonies, there were about 50,000 people gathered in every walks of life across the Jeju island. The firing at civilians by policemen which occurred the same day touched off the March 10 General Strike that was the first and the only one in Jeju history. To Jejueans, General Strike was the expression of the antipathy against power abuses of mainlanders. Even civil servants and policemen whose hometowns are Jeju island participated in the General Strike. The Communal resistance against the repression from the outside is the kind of traditions in Jeju history. The political and social attitude of Jejueans is interpreted as self-governing consciousness. The idea of socialism of left-wing groups in Jeju island was the ideological cover for mass organizing at best.
Second, ‘Sam-il Incident’ was the turning point that ideology and ruling elites in Jeju island change. Most of the leadership of People's Committee had experienced anti-Japanese colonial rule struggle and repatriates from Japan. And they were in the center of ‘Sam-in Event’. Moreover, there were a lot of school teachers and civil servants in the leading group of demonstration and general strike. They had strong national, modern and self-governing consciousness. On liberating from Japan, they were trying to achieve new ideology. But, their hopes were frustrating by the momentum of Sam-il Incident. They escaped to the mountains and some of them were smuggled into Japan. And the rest of them who remained the island were killed during the process of 4?3(Sa-sam) uprising. Therefore, it brought us the consequences that social and people's movements which had been long history were cut off.
Third, ‘Sam-il Incident’ was the momentum that the changeable possibilities of the dynamic relationship between ‘Central and Local’ were broken. After ‘Sam-il Event’, Jeju island were treated as ‘Red Island’ and the Jejueans were the targets of ‘Red Hunts’. Therefore, ‘the view of the marginal area’ which existed during the Chosun Dynasty was revived. There had been clamped down on Jeju by central government through 4?3 uprising. The central government repressed the self-governing rule by physical forces.
First, ‘Sam-il Incident’ is the example in the people's movement history which originated from Jeju struggle during the traditional era and anti-Japanese colonial rule struggle. In ‘Sam-il’ ceremonies, there were about 50,000 people gathered in every walks of life across the Jeju island. The firing at civilians by policemen which occurred the same day touched off the March 10 General Strike that was the first and the only one in Jeju history. To Jejueans, General Strike was the expression of the antipathy against power abuses of mainlanders. Even civil servants and policemen whose hometowns are Jeju island participated in the General Strike. The Communal resistance against the repression from the outside is the kind of traditions in Jeju history. The political and social attitude of Jejueans is interpreted as self-governing consciousness. The idea of socialism of left-wing groups in Jeju island was the ideological cover for mass organizing at best.
Second, ‘Sam-il Incident’ was the turning point that ideology and ruling elites in Jeju island change. Most of the leadership of People's Committee had experienced anti-Japanese colonial rule struggle and repatriates from Japan. And they were in the center of ‘Sam-in Event’. Moreover, there were a lot of school teachers and civil servants in the leading group of demonstration and general strike. They had strong national, modern and self-governing consciousness. On liberating from Japan, they were trying to achieve new ideology. But, their hopes were frustrating by the momentum of Sam-il Incident. They escaped to the mountains and some of them were smuggled into Japan. And the rest of them who remained the island were killed during the process of 4?3(Sa-sam) uprising. Therefore, it brought us the consequences that social and people's movements which had been long history were cut off.
Third, ‘Sam-il Incident’ was the momentum that the changeable possibilities of the dynamic relationship between ‘Central and Local’ were broken. After ‘Sam-il Event’, Jeju island were treated as ‘Red Island’ and the Jejueans were the targets of ‘Red Hunts’. Therefore, ‘the view of the marginal area’ which existed during the Chosun Dynasty was revived. There had been clamped down on Jeju by central government through 4?3 uprising. The central government repressed the self-governing rule by physical forces.
#3ㆍ1사건
#3ㆍ1집회
#3ㆍ10총파업
#항일운동가
#인민위원회
#민주주의 민족전선
#남조선노동당
#3ㆍ1준비위원회
#3ㆍ1대책위원회
#군정재판
#자치의식
#Sam-il Incident
#Sam-il demonstration
#3ㆍ10 General Strike
#anti-Japanese colonial rule activist
#People's Committee
#Democratic and National Front
#South Korea Labor Party
#Preparation committee for Sam-il ceremony
#Committee for Solving Sam-il Incident
#the court under the military government
#self-governing consciousness
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 해방 직후 항일운동가의 인민위원회 참여
Ⅲ. ‘3ㆍ1투쟁기념준비위원회’와 3ㆍ1집회
Ⅳ. ‘3ㆍ1사건대책위원회’와 3ㆍ10총파업
Ⅴ. 집회ㆍ총파업 주도세력의 사회적 성격과 운동 방향
Ⅵ. 맺음말
〈ABSTRACT〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
한국인의 수사상(數思想) 고찰
고조선단군학
2006 .12
-
3.1운동과 구약성경의 구속사적 의의
구약논단
2019 .03
-
Sam Gak San
Korea Journal
1972 .05
-
우리나라 고전에 나오는 한자 식물명 ‘삼(杉)’의 분류학적 실체
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2015 .09
-
<삼대>론 : 새로운 논의를 위하여
현대소설연구
1999 .12
-
Five Poems by Pak Chae-sam
Korea Journal
1967 .06
-
李森(1677-1735)의 문학 연구
시조학논총
1999 .12
-
왜국(일본)에서 본 백제·고구려의 멸망
역사비평
2020 .02
-
의료 총파업은 정당화될 수 있었는가?
철학과 현실
2000 .12
-
김종삼 시에 나타난 연대의 특성
한국문예비평연구
2020 .01
-
Sam Shepard의 초기 작품과 사회 비평
현대영미드라마
1992 .08
-
다윗의 놉 성전 망명과 성스러움 : (삼상 21:1-9; 참조 삼상 22:6-23)
구약논단
2013 .03
-
내가 겪은 사건 1989년 3·16지하철노조 총파업투쟁
역사비평
1993 .02
-
연구위원회 보고
한국역사연구회회보
1993 .09
-
김종삼 시의 언술 구조와 치유성에 관한 연구
열린정신 인문학연구
2018 .04
-
현행 고등학교 『한국사』 교과서의 제주 4･3 사건 서술 내용과 향후 집필 방향
탐라문화
2018 .01
-
해방후 9월총파업의 지역별 전개와 성격
역사연구
2000 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-018333203