메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
현대미술학회 현대미술학 논문집 현대미술학 논문집 제10호
발행연도
2006.12
수록면
201 - 227 (27page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
'The End of Art' written by Arthur Danto has caused diverse discourses on the definition of art as well as the use and abuse of art criticism. He proposes that, since Andy Warhol presented his quasi ready-made objects 'Brillo Box' in 1964, contemporary art has been confronted with the end of art. It means not the crucial end of art itself but the end of a narrative insisted by Clement Greenberg, that is, the end of the modernist narrative. In fact, since Marcel Duchamp introduced the ready-made, the notion of art has been deconstructed. Insertion of non-art materials in art started to be proliferated. Moreover, Joseph Beuys manifested that 'Everyone can be artist', and Andy Warhol's Brillo Box also generated disputation about what is art. According to Danto, in Brillo Box, the long tradition of mimesis in art cannot be established, so it pronounced 'the end of art' . Because contemporary art is professional and self-defined, it has to do with philosophy. He said, after Warhol's Brillo Box, the history of art also reached the point where it had to tum into its own philosophy. Therefore, contemporary artworks need to gam assistance from philosophy, and this condition allowed plural possibilities. Dance's approval of pluralism and recognition of equality in art provides a new vision against old conventions which were produced and commonly enforced by art history and criticism in the modern era. In this article, I raise a question that his contention, on the one hand, can evoke abuse of art criticism. On the other hand, it can stimulate non-necessity of criticism. He argues that artwork is faced with every possibility without any norms. Though, his theory on the end of art is not supported by precise evidences except Brillo Box. In conclusion, I propose that the necessity of art criticism should be still efficient, even though it belongs to the art world as an institution, for the interpretation and evaluation of art. Philosophy is not the only one resource but an applicable means for art criticism. Art criticism is not merely based on the philosophical approach but also might be influenced from other institutional systems including education, journalism, gallery, museum, market, etc.

목차

Ⅰ. 원점으로 되돌아가기
Ⅱ. 예술 네러티브의 종말과 부활한 또 하나의 네러티브
Ⅲ. ‘예술계’는 과연 제도로부터 자유로운가?
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-605-018445827