지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The feature of modem country is recognition of freedom and property as fundamental rights. At the outset, property right was permitted only to tangible goods, but as intellectual creation enriching society has increased, the idea of protection about intangible and intellectual assets emerged. Basically, intellectual property is a conception born in the society where property right is granted and then, it is difficult one to be granted in a communist country that does not recognize private property right. Accordingly, it can be assumed that intellectual property in communist countries may be different from that in capitalist countries.
The most traditional function of trademark is to distinguish trademark owner's goods or services from others. In contrast to other intellectual property rights such as copyright and patent, trademark has the least characteristic as property. Mostly, an owner simply chooses a trademark among existing symbols and less creativity is involved in trademark. Especially, in modem society, advertising function of a trademark becomes more crucial than the function as a source indicator.
The USSR and China, former communist countries, had intellectual property systems including trademark. The trademark in USSR and China performed a conventional function as an indicator of source. Moreover, trademark was a tool for government to control manufacturers, and under planned economy, there was no advertising function of trademark in USSR and China. In the late 1980s, USSR collapsed and Russian Federation was established. China did not suffer such a dramatic change as USSR, but it started to introduce market economy. Recently, both of them try to expand international trade and to increase foreign investigation. To accomplish these purposes, they amended intellectual property law including trademark law and strengthened its protection. Even though elements of communist systems still exist, their continuing efforts will fix these problems promptly.
The most traditional function of trademark is to distinguish trademark owner's goods or services from others. In contrast to other intellectual property rights such as copyright and patent, trademark has the least characteristic as property. Mostly, an owner simply chooses a trademark among existing symbols and less creativity is involved in trademark. Especially, in modem society, advertising function of a trademark becomes more crucial than the function as a source indicator.
The USSR and China, former communist countries, had intellectual property systems including trademark. The trademark in USSR and China performed a conventional function as an indicator of source. Moreover, trademark was a tool for government to control manufacturers, and under planned economy, there was no advertising function of trademark in USSR and China. In the late 1980s, USSR collapsed and Russian Federation was established. China did not suffer such a dramatic change as USSR, but it started to introduce market economy. Recently, both of them try to expand international trade and to increase foreign investigation. To accomplish these purposes, they amended intellectual property law including trademark law and strengthened its protection. Even though elements of communist systems still exist, their continuing efforts will fix these problems promptly.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 사회주의와 지적재산권
Ⅲ. 사회주의체제 하의 상표보호
Ⅳ. 자유주의경제의 도입과 상표보호
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
〈ABSTRACT〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
상표와 상호 사이의 법률적 관계에 관한 연구
法學論文集
2016 .01
-
중국의 근대 상표제도에 관한 소고
동북아법연구
2018 .01
-
소비자오인상표 규제제도 개선방안 연구
법과 정책연구
2009 .01
-
상표법상의 손해배상제도의 문제점과 그 해결방안
법학연구
2002 .12
-
상표의 보호와 표현의 자유
중앙법학
2007 .10
-
China's Legal System of Trademarks
저스티스
1990 .08
-
중국 상표법상 선사용 항변에 관한 연구
무역학회지
2016 .06
-
상표권 남용의 성립요건에 관한 대법원 판례의 검토
민사법의 이론과 실무
2013 .01
-
중국의 상표사용허가계약의 중첩체결에 관한 연구
무역상무연구
2017 .02
-
중국 상표법상 등록과 무효에 관한 연구 : ‘마이클 조단’ 행정판결을 중심으로
무역상무연구
2016 .02
-
중국 상표법상 상표 무효·취소 요건에 관한 고찰
아시아연구
2019 .11
-
A Comparative Study on Obligations of the Franchisor and the Franchisee Regarding Trademarks under Korea and USA Law
무역연구
2017 .01
-
상표의 사용개념에 대한 입법론적 고찰
저스티스
2008 .08
-
중국 지적재산권법에 관한 연구
경영법률
2010 .01
-
상표법 제3조 ‘상표등록 받을 수 있는 자’ 규정의 타당성 및 보완방안
지식재산연구
2014 .06
-
중국 상표법상 상표권침해에 대한 고찰
경영법률
2011 .01
-
상표패러디의 법적취급에 관한 비교법적 연구
경영법률
2011 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-360-018448742